好人一号 2021-11-18

May I ask how to send an email? Should I send it in the "Send email" section in the status interface, or to the email address of the author that was used for journal correspondence before?

好人一号 2021-11-15

Hello, may I ask what should I do in this situation? I don't want to encounter the same situation again.

我是一个潜水党来看各路神仙 2021-10-28

时间 list
Submit 2021.10.26
With Editor 2021.10.27

Translation:
Time list
Submitted on 2021.10.26
With Editor on 2021.10.27

xgr 2021-09-08

What is the result after two under reviewer?

唔啦啦 2021-08-27

Just entered the review stage, hoping for a quick outcome~

二天一流 2021-08-04

Enjoying the good fortune, bless and protect!

yooo835 2021-07-15

What kind of godly luck does the OP have? So fortunate and lucky.

JiaQG 2021-07-15

The first submission to IJEPES, submitted on 5.6, was directly accepted on 7.14. Overall, the processing speed was very fast.

科研的小马 2021-07-15

The speed is too slow. It has been nearly 6 months since submission and there is still no news. I have sent two reminders, but they say the reviewer is still reviewing. It's really slow!

KOBEEE 2021-07-14

Why don't you write an email to ask?

詹姆斯 2021-07-14

I have been waiting for eight and a half months without any feedback from the first trial. I'm feeling frustrated. Is there anyone else as miserable as me???

魔悟空 2021-07-10

2020.12.21 Submission
2020.12.28 with editor
2021.1.17 Under review
2021.2.19 Major revision
2021.3.13 with editor
2021.3.16 Under review
2021.4.19 Minor revision
2021.5.2 with editor
2021.5.6 Under review
2021.6.15 Accept

单行街 2021-07-05

20201211 Post successful
20201211 with editor
20201226 with editor
20210428 major revision (required to return before 0528)
20210523 revised
20210524 with editor
20210525 under review
20210620 accept

科研yy 2021-07-02

Posted on 2020/12/01
First review and revision on 2021/05/12, major revision
First review revision uploaded on 2021/05/16
Second review and revision on 2021/05/25, minor revision
Second review revision uploaded on 2021/05/27
Accepted on 2021/06/28

Overall, the editing process was fast, but it took a long time with the reviewers. There were two reviewers for the first review, one directly accepted it, while the other raised a few simple questions. After the first review revision, it was sent back to the original reviewer.

I had to remind them a few times in between, but the editor had a good attitude. It took a month from minor revision to acceptance, which actually didn't need that long. I suppose the editor was busy and forgot, but after I reminded them once, I received an email the next day directly accepting it.

一号位突破手 2021-06-26

2020/10/12 Post
2020/10/27 Under review
2021/3/1 First round major revision, 35 days
2021/3/19 Returned for revisions
2021/6/22 Accepted

Overall, the review process was slow. There were three reviewers, but one did not provide any comments. The editor consolidated the feedback from the other two reviewers. The comments were not too challenging, but it took a long time. In the final email, only one reviewer's opinion was shown as having no comments. It is unclear why the other reviewers did not respond. Those with sufficient time may consider this journal. Thank you to the reviewer who gave me a chance.

摸鱼大仙 2021-06-21

May I ask how long it usually takes to receive a reply for an extension request for editing? I have been waiting for several days without receiving any response. Should I directly send an email through the system?

搞电的 2021-05-27

This journal did not provide a template, so I followed the IEEE template. This is not important.

wyyhhh 2021-05-27

Excuse me, did you use the paper template provided by the journal for the first draft? Or did you directly format it yourself and submit it?

搞电的 2021-05-23

Posted on 2020-10-16.
First review and revision on 2021-02-04, with a requirement to return by February 28th. There were a total of 4 reviewers, one gave an evaluation of excellent work, one had no comments, and the other two provided constructive feedback and suggested some modifications. Among them, one expert strongly recommended conducting additional experiments.
Revised on 2021-2-25, without conducting the experiments and explaining the reasons.
Directly accepted on 2021-5-22, with the expert who requested experiments expressing understanding and hoping that they can be completed in the future.

twilightwhu 2021-04-15

I first sent an email to the editor, and then the editor replied saying that it can be resubmitted. Then, I submitted the comments, revised manuscript, and other related materials in the system.

WU院长 2021-04-12

May I ask how to appeal to the editor? Should I send an email or explain it in the cover letter when resubmitting? Thank you!

twilightwhu 2021-03-10

Post on August 18, 2020.
Two reviewers on December 9, 2020, it seems like two major revisions, and the editor rejected it.
After carefully responding to the reviewers' comments on January 18, 2021, appealed to the editor, and the editor requested a resubmission. Resubmitted on the same day.
Accepted directly on March 9, 2021.

Hessen 2021-01-20

2020.05.28 Submit
2020.06.01 Under Review
2020.07.15 Major, 9 reviewers, all provided professional comments, requested comparison with the latest research and thorough revision with additional experiments, aiming to satisfy all reviewers as much as possible
2020.11.15 Resubmit, due to personal reasons, requested an extension, returned for revisions on 11.15
2021.01.20 Accepted directly, all reviewers who provided feedback agreed to the acceptance!