gumpsky 2023-02-26

Last November, I submitted another article at the beginning of the month. Everything went smoothly at first, but currently it is in the third round of revisions. It has been 8 days since then and I am anxiously awaiting the outcome. I hope it can be accepted in the coming week, feeling nervous and on edge!

aeghmnoz 2023-02-21

Have you received the feedback from the first review? It's been over 40 days and there is still no confirmation from the reviewers. I am now in the second round of finding reviewers as an editor.

XWZRBY 2023-02-21

It was difficult for me to find reviewers at that time, so in the end, there were only two review opinions.

TheShine 2023-02-21

May I ask how many reviewers' opinions are needed?

aeghmnoz 2023-02-18

The acceptable level of overlap is a maximum of 10-15%; you can think about submitting a new entry once this level of overlap has been decreased.

花花729 2023-02-13

May I ask if you have submitted the data?

阳光男孩123 2023-02-07

The plagiarism check should not include the reference list.
As shown in Figure 1... From Table 1, it can be seen that... These areas are prone to repetition.

scinfo 2023-02-07

2023.2.6 Submitted to Journal
2023.2.9 With Editor
2023.2.15 Under Review
2023.5.12 Required Reviews Completed
2023.5.15 Decision in Process
2023.5.20 Completed Reject

Translated:
2023.2.6 Submitted to Journal
2023.2.9 With Editor
2023.2.15 Under Review
2023.5.12 Required Reviews Completed
2023.5.15 Decision in Process
2023.5.20 Completed Reject

莱布妮子 2023-02-07

May I ask if copying more than 20% includes references?

XWZRBY 2023-02-06

Can be submitted, the classmate's previous repetition rate was exceeded, but after the reduction, it was resubmitted and approved for review.

阳光男孩123 2023-02-06

The repetition rate is over twenty percent. The editor-in-chief has directly rejected the submission. May I resubmit it after making the necessary modifications? Thank you.

大石头 2023-02-06

2021/8/12 Submitted to Journal
2021/8/14 With Editor
2021/9/23 Under Review
2021/9/23 Required Reviews Completed
2021/11/01 Decision in Process
2021/11/02 Revise Major
2021/12/13 Under Review
2022/9/7 Revise
2022/09/25 With Editor
2022/09/31 Under Review
2023/01/11 Revise
2023/01/21 With Editor
2023/01/24 Accept

The text has been translated into English as follows:

2021/8/12 Submitted to Journal
2021/8/14 With Editor
2021/9/23 Under Review
2021/9/23 Required Reviews Completed
2021/11/01 Decision in Process
2021/11/02 Revise Major
2021/12/13 Under Review
2022/9/7 Revise
2022/09/25 With Editor
2022/09/31 Under Review
2023/01/11 Revise
2023/01/21 With Editor
2023/01/24 Accept

EleaM Josen Haplacg 2023-01-24

2022 7.20 Submit - Submitted on July 20, 2022.
2022 7.22 Under Review - Under review since July 22, 2022.
2022 8.22 Major Revision - Requires major revisions since August 22, 2022.
2022 9.20 Revision Submit - Revised version submitted on September 20, 2022.
2022 9.29 Under Review - Under review since September 29, 2022.
2022 12.10 Accept with Minor Revision (Language) - Accepted with minor revisions related to language on December 10, 2022.
2023 1.9 Revision Submit - Revised version submitted on January 9, 2023.
2023 1.14 Accept - Accepted on January 14, 2023.

千千阙歌 2023-01-24

Envy, it has been over a year and the final verdict is still not out.

千千阙歌 2023-01-24

Envy, it has been over a year and there are still no results.

researcher_china 2023-01-18

Does it mean that if there are 3 lines displayed on the EM system, it represents that all authors have confirmed? If it is only 2 lines, then there are authors who have not yet confirmed, and an additional line "View Reference Checking Results" has been added.

九徊 2023-01-17

2022.12.28投 (Submitted on December 28, 2022)
2023.01.17依然是with editor (Still with editor on January 17, 2023)

Could it be because the author has not confirmed, so it hasn't been processed yet?

codewen77 2023-01-15

Congratulations, but the cycle is so long, 0.0.

千千阙歌 2023-01-13

2021.12 submission
The first-instance result has not been given yet, and I am already devastated.

CarolUP 2023-01-11

2022.7.25 submitted
2022.8.1 under review
2022.9.29 required reviews completed
2022.10.5 major revision
2022.11.6 resubmit
2022.11.8 under review
2022.12.12 required reviews completed
2022.12.14 major revision
2022.12.16 resubmit
2022.12.17 under review
2022.12.18 accept with minor revision
2022.12.18 resubmit
2023.1.1 accept

Translation:
2022.7.25 - Submitted
2022.8.1 - Under review
2022.9.29 - Required reviews completed
2022.10.5 - Major revision
2022.11.6 - Resubmit
2022.11.8 - Under review
2022.12.12 - Required reviews completed
2022.12.14 - Major revision
2022.12.16 - Resubmit
2022.12.17 - Under review
2022.12.18 - Accept with minor revision
2022.12.18 - Resubmit
2023.1.1 - Accept

XWZRBY 2023-01-09

Timeline (2022-2023):
2022.03.12 Initial Date Submitted
2022.03.15 with editor
2022.03.17 under review
2022.08.06 major revision
2022.09.10 resubmit
2022.11.25 minor revision
2022.11.28 resubmit
2023.01.07 accept with minor revision
2023.01.31 accept.

Roy鹿 2023-01-07

I want to ask how to see such detailed status.

What 2022-12-27

Classmates, I want to ask what should we do if the corresponding author has not received the "Manuscript Query Status System."

XWZRBY 2022-12-13

It should be below 20%.

青椒小白 2022-12-13

May I ask what is the maximum acceptable similarity rate for articles in this journal?

青椒小白 2022-12-13

May I ask what is the maximum acceptable rate of paper duplication for this journal? Thank you.

XWZRBY 2022-12-12

Xiao Xiu, please make some edits to the words and grammar. It has been submitted for half a month and is still "With Editor". Sigh!

11o 2022-12-01

I want to ask, in the review email, it is recommended to use interactive data visualization. Do I have to do this?

科研-婷婷 2022-11-23

After entering the external review process, the journal will send the corresponding author a review tracking link, which will update the review status in real-time, indicating that no one has accepted the review yet.

不羁 2022-11-21

Cluster research has been accepted. Here is a timeline:
- Submitted on January 8, 2022.
- Under review since February.
- Revised and reviewed by two reviewers around October.
- Feedback received by the end of October.
- Accepted on November 20.
Information Sciences is a respectable journal in the field of computer science, and it is not easy to have an article published there. However, it may still have some distance from top-tier journals.