sanlun 2022-01-14

I am the 11th. Send me an email saying that the status of the article has changed, and it has been this way ever since. I was also quite fast during the first review.

ddddds 2022-01-14

I have already prepared an email to urge the editor-in-chief. It is too slow, it has been over a year for just one manuscript.

ddddds 2022-01-14

Hello, you can't reply directly, open a new one.
I appeared on the 7th and haven't changed. How about you? The first trial only took 2 days, but this time it's much slower.

sanlun 2022-01-14

Hello, how long has your decision been in process? Mine has also been in this state for a while.

ddddds 2022-01-12

Last time was fast, but this time is very slow. The second review decision is in process and not moving.

zilong 2022-01-12

2022 1.08 submit - Submitted on January 8, 2022.
2022 1.10 under review - Under review since January 10, 2022.

zilong 2022-01-06

Hello, may I ask which format is used for editing in EndNote? And which journal is this for?

Pisc 2022-01-06

Did the editor take a Christmas break? It has been half a month with the editor.

Cynthial 2022-01-05

Hello, may I ask how much is the page fee for the journal?

joy_me 2021-12-31

The next day, I received feedback stating that my submission did not align with the journal's focus. I looked through the articles published in the journal in the past two years and indeed, there were no papers in this direction. The editor's response was quite prompt. I have decided to submit elsewhere.

小叶Sama 2021-12-28

2020-10-29 Submission
2021-03-23 Urgent Review
2021-08-12 Major Revision
2021-12-12 Minor Revision
2021-12-25 Acceptance

The first review was very slow, waited for nearly five months, and after urging for the review, waited for almost five more months to receive the results. It took about two and a half months to get the results after submitting the major revision for minor revisions. After submitting the minor revision, I received the acceptance notice two days later. During the major revision, there were three reviewers, two of whom provided specific opinions that were easy to address, such as adding experimental drawings. The other reviewer did not pay much attention to the article and provided vague opinions, but they were still manageable. During the minor revision, all reviewers had already agreed to accept the article, and the editor only requested language polishing. Overall, the submission process was lengthy, but relatively smooth! I hope my experience can be helpful for future submissions for everyone!

Frank90 2021-12-28

Big brother, I'm downstairs. I was rejected, but I didn't write any suggestions for reapplying or reasons for not being able to apply.

Veileno 2021-12-25

2021.12.20 Submit modification
2021.12.25 Accept

bigcircle 2021-12-21

Your speed in reviewing is really exaggerated.

Veileno 2021-12-21

The process is really not easy. Congratulations!

Joie 2021-12-21

Accepted. Be sure to carefully read the journal's decision on whether to recommend resubmission or not for your writing.

Joie 2021-12-21

Specifically, let me explain:

The first submission was made on September 14, 2020 and November 30, 2020, but it was rejected. The reasons were that some references were missing, the grammar was poor, and the readability was very low.

Then, a round after round of revisions began. In fact, it was resubmitted at the end of March, but there was a system error at that time, and the co-author did not receive the confirmation email. They were constantly negotiating with the editor, who had a good attitude. Finally, the system showed the resubmission date as May.

The resubmission was made on March 4, 2021, but the system showed May 4, 2021.

The first feedback date was July 5, 2021, requiring major revisions. The revised version was submitted on August 15.

They waited for the editor's feedback on September 15.

The second feedback date was October 3, requiring minor revisions. The revised version was submitted on November 5.

They received the awaited editor's feedback on November 12.

They agreed to accept it on December 12.

They agreed to the related documents on December 16.

The journal website still showed the unmodified format of the paper on December 18.

The proof was submitted on December 21.

Frank90 2021-12-11

I hope you can succeed. I also plan to reapply. Big brother, if you are hired, remember to leave a message, thank you.

Joie 2021-12-09

After resubmission, the editor found three new reviewers to review the manuscript. All reviewers gave positive feedback, but revisions were needed. After making the revisions as requested, they all confirmed that it was acceptable. Then, the editor requested language modifications and the manuscript was resubmitted. Currently, it is awaiting a decision from the editor. The specific situation is still unknown, but it has been nearly a month.

Joie 2021-12-09

It has been a month since entering the editing decision.

Veileno 2021-12-02

2021.09.03 Submission with editor
2021.09.05 Under review
2021.09.12 Required reviews completed, expecting feedback from 3 reviewers
2021.09.16 Required reviews completed, expecting feedback from the 4th reviewer
2021.09.16 Decision in process -> Major revision required. Speedy response on the same day, 2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, and 1 acceptance.
2021.10.15 Submitted revisions with editor (waited for a month, didn't want to rush)
2021.10.20 Under review
2021.11.01 Required reviews completed
2021.11.02 Decision in process (looking forward to it)
2021.12.02 Revision requested (waited for a whole month). The editor requested improvement in language and reducing the number of references to 50 or less. All three reviewers agreed.
- Updates to follow -

Frank90 2021-11-24

What happened after the reapplication? Were you hired?

Frank90 2021-11-24

After resubmission, how is it going? Have you been hired?

Frank90 2021-11-23

What happened in the end? Was it a tragedy?

Lst发SCI啊 2021-11-22

Submission in mid-September
Notice of major revisions in early October (3 reviewers, 2 indicating the research is interesting, 1 indicating it is average, all suggesting revisions)
Submission of revisions after one week
Transfer pending in mid-November, rejected (3 reviewers, 2 indicating it is okay, 1 indicating it is not enough)
Maybe I'm just not skilled enough~
Thumbs up to the speed of this journal.

木子Fairy\ 2021-11-16

Submitted on October 8th, reviewed after two or three days, transfer pending on November 11th, and promptly rejected. Two experts, one thought it lacked innovation, and the other suggested revisions. The editor refused.

xstsz 2021-11-16

Promising journal, hoping to remain stable in the first quartile.

xstsz 2021-11-16

Promising journal

Veileno 2021-11-11

The text translates to: "Second review, decision in process. It has been waiting for 10 days."

zfw 2021-11-08

I would like to ask, how is the current situation?
Also, does this journal focus more on the content or on innovation? Welcome everyone to comment below.