飞猪打豆豆 2022-03-16

Posted in early January 2021, a major revision of opinions in late April; submitted after revision at the end of May, accepted after minor revisions in early July; submitted again at the end of July, no news until September when reminded, and accepted.
There were three reviewers in total, with more opinions in the first round; the second round mainly required English proofreading.

jackfan 2022-03-08

Hello, host, may I ask if when submitting a post, should the text and each image be submitted separately? I see that images need to be submitted, should each image be submitted one by one? What should be submitted when submitting?

jackfan 2022-03-08

Hello, host, may I ask, when submitting an article, should the tex and each picture be submitted separately? I see that pictures need to be submitted, should each picture be submitted one by one?

风痕 2022-03-02

Posted on 2022.02.15, currently still in the editorial department, not assigned to an AE yet, do you need a reminder?

攒一身可爱 2022-03-01

May I ask on which website did you see the unassigned reviewers for the duck? On the submission page I can only see peer reviews, I don't know if any reviewers have been assigned.

ben2020 2022-02-28

2021.6.30 submit
2022.2.28 in peer review
Eight months and still no review.

ZhongYa~ 2022-02-21

Hello, I wanted to ask, what was the reason for your rejection?

nwpu_qhd 2022-02-16

More than two months have passed, and it was rejected. Three reviewers, three major revisions, and the editor gave a rejection.

论文君 2022-01-14

Several months for the first trial.

Hello_Hell 2022-01-01

How long did the second trial take?

carl 2021-12-28

Three reviewers, 2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, a total of ten questions. The speed of the review is really fast, and the comments are also very, very nice!

Golfnss 2021-12-18

2021.06 submitted
2021.12 major revision
------------------------------
2022.01 resubmitted
2022.06 accepted
Encountered a more laid-back AE, luckily it was smoothly accepted in the end.

cqulyq 2021-12-09

How does the original poster know about the allocation of AE? I submitted on 11.29, had the editor on the 30th, and then it went under review. Feeling anxious.

cchhushdfl;a 2021-12-09

Hello, may I ask how many papers from TMM did your article cite?

CN_JLiu666 2021-12-02

What is the situation with the AE that has not been assigned since the post on November 23? Can you please send an email to remind them?

LX917 2021-11-30

2021.11.16 Post
2021.11.22 AE Assignment

帽子里的兔子 2021-11-23

Post on November 18, 2021,
Assigned to AE on November 23, 2021,
Hoping the reviewer will go easy on me and allow me to graduate (humble).

carl 2021-11-17

2021.11.9 Submission
2021.11.16 Assigned Associate Editor, entered peer review, reviewers have not been assigned yet.

conquerboy 2021-11-10

Can TMM be revised for the second time? Some journals do not allow second revisions, only resubmissions.

Golfnss 2021-11-09

The OP has been rejected for 8 months... It's so miserable... I haven't received any updates in the past 5 months, and I'm afraid.

Dr.WW 2021-10-22

Image processing, the associate editor is a foreigner, and the review process is slow and tedious.

攒一身可爱 2021-10-21

Both being unfortunate souls... What is the direction of the author's thesis?

找个好工作 2021-10-19

The first trial took 4 months for major revisions, and the second trial took 3 months and resulted in direct employment.

Dr.WW 2021-10-19

"Submitted on October 14th."

Dr.WW 2021-10-19

After three reminders for the first review, the result was given after 8 months. One reviewer recommended major revisions while the other one rejected it, resulting in rejection.

SCIccc 2021-09-11

Excuse me, what kind of trash journal is this? It has been 8 days since submission and still no assigned Associate Editor. Is there no one working in this journal?

NXE 2021-08-30

May I ask how many reviewers you have?

小超超~ 2021-08-21

Submitted on June 23, 2021.
Rejected on August 14, 2021.

hucares 2021-06-29

Submitted in early February, received the major revision results in April. Three reviewers gave two revise and resubmit (RQ) and one accept with minor revisions (AQ). The reviewers' comments were quite critical and focused on the concern about insufficient time for conducting experiments when submitting the paper. After more than a month of revisions, it was accepted at the end of June. The review process was still very prompt.

bighead 2021-06-23

After one year of submission, it was finally accepted. There were two major revisions and one minor revision. The response time for feedback was decent, with a new version being released approximately every two to three months.

However, the peer review process was quite frustrating. The reviewers made various requests to cite irrelevant personal papers, and in the end, they mistakenly misinterpreted a citation number, causing a delay of another three months for the miner. Additionally, the journal's editorial team did not intervene and simply forwarded the incorrect information.

As a journal in its growing phase, there are still many areas that need improvement.