chensiya 2021-02-26

What is the final result?

KzwK 2021-02-15

2021.02.07 Paper submission;
2021.02.15 Direct rejection, reason being lack of experimental verification, and the rejecting editor is Changyun Wen from Nanyang Technological University.
My paper includes experimental verification spanning two pages, so the reason for rejection feels very puzzling. Has anyone encountered a similar situation?

tell_more 2021-02-05

2020.05.23 Paper submission;
2020.07.15 Received notice of major revisions with 40 comments from 5 reviewers, very professional. Took over a month to revise;
2020.09.13 Received notice of major revisions with 3 remaining reviewer questions. Based on the previous response, reviewers raised additional questions. Took 30 days to make revisions;
2020.11.21 Received notice of major revisions with 1 remaining reviewer question. Reviewer consistently requested the inclusion of certain signal curves in the paper, but these curves could not be measured. Spent a month researching and consulting teachers in related fields, ultimately providing a detailed explanation for the inability to measure the curves;
2021.01.21 Received notice of minor revisions. Reviewer pointed out several grammar errors in the article. Took two days to make revisions;
2021.02.05 The submission system status shows "Awaiting AE Recommendation." The results should be available soon, hoping for good news.

celia111 2021-01-14

Submission Experience:
2019.02.16 First submission
2019.03.30 Rejection with suggestions to resubmit, 6 reviewers' opinions, one suggested rejection;
2020.08.19 Revised and supplemented experiments, resubmitted with a response document of nearly 50 pages;
2020.09.24 Major revision, four reviewers' opinions, one acceptance, one minor revision, two major revisions;
2020.11.05 Revised
2020.12.06 Minor revision
2021.01.12 Accepted
Excluding the time for rejection and resubmission, it took around 5 months from start to finish.

celia111 2021-01-07

Xiao Xiu's results are coming out soon, feeling nervous.