giermeng 2022-10-29

5.26 First submission
6.26 Re-submission after rejection. Reviewer 1 raised several professional questions, and Reviewer 2 raised a few minor issues.
9.06 Second submission
10.11 Re-submission after rejection. Reviewer 1 still had doubts about the answers and a new reviewer was added, who had a very positive opinion.
10.26 Third submission. Added some experimental details and provided a positive response to Reviewer 1's comments.
10.28 Received acceptance email.
Overall, the journal is quite good, and the reviewers' comments are relevant. However, the associate editor is rather strange.

wolfdarling 2022-10-07

Second GRSL article, submitted one month after the first article.
Submitted on May 23rd.
Received first review on July 10th, with two reviewers. The first reviewer had 6 questions, and the second reviewer had 12 questions. Requested a one-week extension to make revisions.
Revised on August 4th.
Received second review on August 24th. The first reviewer had one lingering question, and the second reviewer raised three additional questions. They also delved into four more questions regarding our previous responses. They suggested that we improve the writing, and the editor also recommended the same. They also asked for proof of the improvements. Helplessly, we made the necessary improvements. Although the second reviewer had many questions, they were clear and guided us on how to make the modifications. The first reviewer's question was vague, and although their attitude seemed good, we still took their question seriously and replied carefully.
Revised on August 31st.
Received feedback on September 8th. The second reviewer was satisfied with our response. The first reviewer had a strong attitude and insisted on their viewpoint. Unfortunately, our manuscript was rejected and had to be resubmitted. (According to our field of submission, the first reviewer did not consider a factor that others mentioned, but they insisted we consider it.) There was no other choice but to redo the experiments.
Resubmitted on September 13th.
Finally accepted on October 7th. Despite the twists and turns, the outcome was still good.

lin jh 2022-10-03

Hello, I would like to ask. Will the review process be faster in another journal after transferring?

wolfdarling 2022-10-03

I often come here to check for journal information, so let me also provide the submission process.
Submitted on April 22nd,
Received reviewer comments on July 6th, with one accepting and one rejecting. Rejected and resubmitted.
Conducted additional experiments and added content on August 15th. Replied to both reviewers' comments and resubmitted.
Reviewer 2 was satisfied with the response on October 2nd, and accepted the submission.

qwe123 2022-10-02

Me too. It's been two and a half months already.

splitthelark 2022-09-30

U and R in uppercase, Undergoing Review.

Nature后备队 2022-09-30

Second review: Reviewer 1 retains question 1, and then suggests resubmission after rejection, with a return within three months.

qwe123 2022-09-30

Brother, may I ask if you are undergoing review or Undergoing Review? I submitted on July 19th and I am in the same situation as you, except mine is Undergoing Review.

splitthelark 2022-09-29

2022. 7.14 Manuscript submitted
2022. 10.12 Revisions Required (21 Days)
2022. 11.01 Revision submitted
2022. 11.29 Revisions Required (21 Days)
2022. 12.03 Revision submitted
2023. 01.03 Accepted

Translation:
2022. 7.14 Manuscript submitted
2022. 10.12 Revisions Required (21 Days)
2022. 11.01 Revision submitted
2022. 11.29 Revisions Required (21 Days)
2022. 12.03 Revision submitted
2023. 01.03 Accepted

Holmedow 2022-09-29

A bit speechless, I was rejected after submitting for more than a month, with the reason being that the article exceeded the 5-page limit... However, the paper I submitted did not exceed 5 pages. Are there any similar classmates?

Nature后备队 2022-09-29

The first review will yield results in two months, and after making changes, it was submitted; however, there has been no news for one month. The review process is very fast.

不系舟 2022-09-21

u and r are capitalized, which means they are for review.

xceeet6 2022-09-19

Hello, may I ask if "Undergoing Review" means it has been submitted for review? It has been two months, which is quite scary. Thank you.

Ciao_Z 2022-09-17

5.10 Submission
8.10 First review result, each of the two reviewers provided 5 comments, requiring a return within 21 days
8.27 Submit revised version
9.13 Accepted based on the current version
Overall, the review process was relatively fast. The first review was prompted once and took three months, which is considered quite long. However, the subsequent handling was quick. The editor's replies to emails were patient and timely.

000100 2022-09-16

The submission has been close to 3 months without any notification of not meeting the journal's objectives, and it has not been sent for review either. I was asked to turn around and submit it to JSTRS instead. It's quite unacceptable that it has been 3 months without being sent for review.

lin jh 2022-09-15

Can I ask if the rejected and resubmitted paper should be annotated with different colors to mark the revised parts?

鑫~fighting 2022-09-15

Congratulations, host! May I ask if the status "Undergoing Review" means that the submission has been sent for review?

naivechildghc 2022-09-14

June 14th, Submitted
July 31st, Revisions Required (21 days)
August 18th, Revision Submitted
September 14th, Accept
This is the first SCI paper accepted during the Master's stage. The journal processed the manuscript quite quickly, taking exactly 3 months from submission to acceptance. The three reviewers were very diligent and responsible, raising many questions to help improve the quality of the paper.

不系舟 2022-09-07

u and r are capitalized, which means they have been submitted for review. Otherwise, they are still in the hands of the editor.

000100 2022-09-02

The current status is "Undergoing Review." Does this mean it has already been submitted for review?

不系舟 2022-09-02

The uppercase "Undergoing Review" means it has been submitted, while the lowercase "undergoing review" means it is still in the hands of the editor.

Joie 2022-08-29

I have been waiting for a month. It is undergoing review. Has it been submitted or not?

000100 2022-08-29

The submission has been Undergoing Review for two months, without comments coming in that quickly.

Hilbert Space 2022-08-27

GRSL is a short article, how can it be converted?

qwe123 2022-08-26

Brother, I am the same. From July 19th until now, it has been undergoing review without any response.

zoeyiiiiii 2022-08-24

Excuse me, everyone. Will this journal display the admin's name? Since July 7th, it has been undergoing review and there has been no admin's name. Does this mean that the editor has not been found yet? The same issue of TGRS displays the admin's name.

Katherine_Di 2022-08-19

I encourage to try again. It's possible.

dadatong 2022-08-17

Submission on April 3rd to TGRS.
Recommended transfer to GRSL on June 9th.
Transfer to GRSL on June 18th.
Minor revision for GRSL on August 9th.
Submitted revised manuscript on August 11th.
Accepted on August 17th.
Overall, it went quite smoothly, although it took half a year from initial submission to final acceptance. The reviewers for GRSL and TGRS were the same, and both journals' editorial staff were very responsible and prompt in their responses. Thank you and wishing GRSL continued success.

nuonuo12 2022-08-10

One month of editing rejection, no comments.

jj431 2022-07-25

Can I still invest if I am rejected?