认证评论 - Fuel
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

allanjuly 2021-02-20

Waited for more than four months, two reviewers made significant revisions, and finally the editor rejected it. It's really too slow. Meanwhile, the article submitted to BITE has already been published in three months.

艰难行走 2021-02-09

Did it take four months for the first trial?

allanjuly 2021-02-09

The first piece was particularly fast, and it took only two months to be hired. This time it took half a month for the review, and currently, it has been four months since the review started, and it's still not over. I'm getting a bit impatient.

zyn792102916 2021-02-07

2020.11.16 submit - Submitted on November 16, 2020.
2020.11.17 with editor - Under editorial review on November 17, 2020.
2020.12.3 under review - Under review on December 3, 2020.
2020.12.27 revise(6个审稿人,5个小修,1个称赞了工作只提了几个问题) - Revision required on December 27, 2020 (6 reviewers, 5 minor revisions, 1 praised the work but raised a few questions).
2021.1.15 resubmit - Resubmitted on January 15, 2021.
2021.1.29 required reviews completed - Required reviews completed on January 29, 2021.
2021.2.7 accept - Accepted on February 7, 2021.

After submission, the editor-in-chief, Huang Zuohua, transferred the article to Pietro Bartocci, who was previously a Subject Editor. However, when checking the Fuel homepage on February 5th, it was found that this person had been promoted to Deputy Editor, and Professor Li Baoqing had become an editorial board member. Personally, I feel that the processing speed of this editor is relatively slow (possibly due to being Italian... not intentionally being critical, haha), and they invited 6 reviewers, which almost overwhelmed me. Fortunately, the reviewers' opinions were relatively positive, and it did not affect the subsequent acceptance. Finally, I wish you all good luck.

让人头秃 2021-02-06

Excuse me, may I ask who your editor is?

让人头秃 2021-02-06

Suggestion, hurry up directly!!! Don't be afraid, maybe the editor just forgot.

SCI太难啦 2021-02-06

It has been half a year. It has already been nearly three months since the return for repair. The wait is agonizing!

让人头秃 2021-02-06

He is probably referring to the theme editor. He is really slow. My manuscript has been in his hands for more than 20 days before being submitted for review.

希望79 2021-02-03

Hello, may I ask how long it took for your paper on fuel to be reviewed after submission? Thank you.

艰难行走 2021-02-01

May I ask who your editor is?

让人头秃 2021-01-29

This time it took more than 20 days for the editor to review it, while last time it was reviewed the next day...

fanfan123 2021-01-21

9.6 submit
9.8 with editor
9.21 under review
11.30 revise (2 reviewers, minor revisions, accepted)
12.20 resubmit
12.21 under review
2021.1.18 accept (editor provides feedback, accepted by reviewers, immediate approval by editor)
2021.1.19 accept (accepted by publisher, manuscript publication processing)

艰难行走 2021-01-16

You can go to the Elsevier customer service system to urge the editor through customer service. Generally, there will be results within one day. Previously, it took me a month for the required reviews to be completed, but after urging, the editor returned with comments within five hours.

SCI太难啦 2021-01-15

It has been two months since the return for repair, and there is still no result. I'm about to collapse.

may it be 2021-01-14

Similarly, once the required reviews are completed, I don't know when the feedback will be provided.

lsxq 2021-01-13

It has been a month since the Required Reviews were completed. I wonder if I should remind the editor to handle it.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started