YJHONG 2022-08-13

The requirements for the paper are strict, and the reviewers are very strict. It is necessary to have a certain degree of innovation before submitting, otherwise it would be a waste of time. If major revisions are required during the second review, the paper may still be rejected. The editorial process is fast, but it is still recommended to have a certain degree of innovation in the paper. Otherwise, the reviewers are likely to reject it. It is not that easy.

佑手指环 2022-08-11

Original text: 楼主，你好，我是做通信方向的，投稿的时候需要上传相关代码吗？

Translation: Hello, host, I am in the field of communication. Do I need to upload relevant code when submitting contributions?

佑手指环 2022-08-11

Hello, OP. This journal focuses on algorithm simulation. Do we need to submit the relevant code when submitting an article?

Seto Kaiba 2022-08-07

8th August, 2022 submitted.

thNLP 2022-08-03

7.10 Submission
7.20 Unable to find reviewers, let me recommend a few more
Still under review
Why is that? Will it be rejected?

lyj-LP 2022-08-01

I will return for repair on July 23rd, and the revised version review will take place on July 24th. However, until today, there is still no news...

枫之叶39 2022-08-01

First time sharing, I feel that this journal is very powerful in terms of peer review and quality control. Below is the status of my submission, let me share it first:

Submitted on July 7, 2022,
Under review on July 8,
Major revision on July 22,
Revisions requested on July 31,
Revised version review on August 1
.......
Looking forward to good results.

sadasfasd 2022-07-27

2022.7.16 Submitted
2020.7.18 Under review
(Will update later!)

lyj-LP 2022-07-26

You're too fast! I submitted it on June 16th, received major revisions on July 14th, sent it back for further revisions on the evening of July 23rd. It's been the third day today. I hope to borrow your good luck.

rockU 2022-07-25

Posted on June 28th, first review returned on July 12th, major revisions suggested (three reviewers, one accepted directly, while the other two experts provided some significant comments, overall the feedback was positive). Revised on July 18th, decision made by the editor on July 22nd, accepted on July 25th.

坚果酱 2022-07-07

Hey friends, how many days will it be under review?

lyj-LP 2022-06-20

Does it mean that if there is no "under review" after four days, it has already been rejected...

lyj-LP 2022-06-20

It has been four days pending review, if there is no "under review", does it mean it has already been rejected...

lyj-LP 2022-06-20

Does this journal have an "under review" phase?

lyj-LP 2022-06-20

What is the current situation?

rockU 2022-06-18

Just submitted. If rejected, I hope it can be done quickly, please don't delay.

lyj-LP 2022-06-16

June 16, 2022, first draft submission.

hecongcong 2022-05-23

Do the journals accept articles on natural language processing?

鼬 2022-05-17

How long have you been pending review? I have been waiting for one week.

认真科研 2022-05-16

Hello, how much does this journal cost? Is it a fixed price or does it depend on the number of pages?

chennnyang 2022-04-17

Apart from being expensive, there are no other problems. The review process is fast, and it is published quickly.

2022.01.01
* Submission
2022.01.04
* Received by the editorial department
2022.01.05
* Assigned to an editor
* Under review
2022.01.13
* Editor sent an email asking for my recommendation of reviewers
2022.01.25
* First round of review comments received: two reviewers
2022.02.02
* Submitted revised manuscript after the first round of review
2022.02.05
* Second round of review comments received: two experts agreed to accept
2022.02.16
* Proofreading
2022.02.16
* Payment made, to be published

Start04 2022-04-16

The article about clustering that I submitted was processed quickly by the editor, and the reviewers were very professional.
Submitted on 3/22.
First review and major revision on 4/7 (2 reviewers, 1 acceptance, 1 major revision). The editor assigned a professional reviewer for the major revision, who has deep research experience in the field of deep clustering. The reviewer provided professional comments mainly focusing on experimental issues, suggesting to add comparative algorithms, datasets, and discussion of experimental results. We replied to each comment sincerely according to the reviewer's suggestions.
Revised and resubmitted on 4/12.
Received second review comments from the reviewer on 4/14, with no significant issues.
Accepted by the editor on 4/15.

可佳 2022-04-04

The review speed of the journal and the dedication of the editors are commendable. There was news about the submission after about one month, and then it went through three rounds of revisions and polishing for another month. The reviewers' comments were very pertinent, and the questions raised were very sharp. The quality requirements for the paper are very high. In the end, it was found that the quality of the paper has improved significantly.

549725406 2022-03-15

12.16投 (投) - Submitted on December 16th
2.08一审大修 (一审大修) - First trial major revision on February 8th
3.04二审大修 (二审大修) - Second trial major revision on March 4th
3.14接受 (接受) - Accepted on March 14th

549725406 2022-03-15

The first trial was fast, but the second trial was slow. There were two opinions in the first trial, one was resolved and the other required major revisions. However, it was difficult to address the opinion on major revisions and experiments were needed. It happened to be during the New Year, so it was not improved well. In the second trial, there was an additional acceptance opinion. The reviewer for major revisions saw that I didn't make good changes and directly rejected it, but the editor still gave me a chance. This time, I had more time, so I replied seriously, and then it was accepted. Overall, it wasn't as easy as imagined. This article was weakly accepted and weakly rejected at ICML at that time, and it wasn't directly accepted at Entropy either. In short, it was a little harder than expected.

lanmao1 2022-02-13

Encountered three reviewers, two major revisions, one minor revision, and a total of about 40 review comments. The reviewers were very persistent, as they wouldn't accept any unresolved issues. The editor was very fast in their work, both in editing and in reviewing. The questions were quite tricky, making me work tirelessly. However, I feel that the quality of the paper has greatly improved.

549725406 2022-01-21

Submitted for a month and entered pending decision. Entered pending decision on the 16th, and until today, the 21st, there is still no outcome.

唯一神 2022-01-14

After two major overhauls, the recruitment process took one month, which is already quite fast. Responding to the reviewer's comments one by one, there were no major issues.

唯一神 2022-01-03

The manuscript review was quick. It took two weeks for major revisions, and now it has been submitted after the revisions were completed. Now, we are waiting for the results.

lqxass 2021-12-28

The review process is fast, with review comments available within 2 weeks. After revisions, the paper will be accepted. The journal has high requirements for English proficiency, but as long as there are no major errors in the early stages, it is acceptable. After acceptance, there is free proofreading available. Overall, it is very good and suitable for student submissions.