Ranyin110 2021-06-11

Excuse me, OP, do you have a staff check process? It has been 23 days and it has always been staff check, with no changes.

Ranyin110 2021-06-11

Excuse me, is there a staff check phase? It has been 23 days since I submitted, and it has always been in the staff check phase without any changes.

才华高价回收 2021-06-10

I checked the instant impact factor (IF) for 2020. In total, there were 4548 articles and reviews published in 2018 and 2019. The total citations for 2020 were 31725, resulting in an instant IF of 6.9756 (31725/4548). The IF for 2019 was 6.082, showing a significant increase. I wonder how different it will be from the final published result (by the end of June). Please correct me if I made any mistakes!

才华高价回收 2021-06-10

Some reviewers may directly write "minor revision" or "major revision" as suggestions. If they don't write it, then it depends on the nature and content of their comments. After seeing many such comments, one can roughly judge the type of revision needed.

jjjkkk 2021-06-10

May I ask how the original poster saw the conclusive comments from the reviewer indicating "major revision," "minor revision," or "rejection"?

心想事成 2021-06-10

May I ask, during the second review, did the editor again send the manuscript directly to the expert who rejected it?

jjjkkk 2021-06-07

May I ask how did you, the original poster, manage to see such detailed comments from the reviewer? I only received major revision suggestions from the editor, and there was nothing written about the reviewer rejecting the paper or requesting major revisions.

心想事成 2021-06-07

Ask the upstairs senior, during the second review, will the editor still send the manuscript to the expert who directly rejected it in the first review? The expert who rejected the manuscript in the first review did not mention any problems.

ssdasa 2021-06-05

It has been 10 days with the editor. On the 4th day, there was a change of editor, and there has been no news up until now.

Ranyin110 2021-06-03

Is it normal for staff to undergo checks for half a month?

fengxiaoma 2021-06-03

One month after submission, the status is still "Current status: Staff check." May I ask if this is in the review process? Thank you!

cooper211 2021-05-26

2020.10.1 Submission
2020.11.1 Major revision
2021.2.10 Modified and returned
2021.4.1 Minor revision
2021.4.12 Modified and returned
2021.5.12 Minor revision
2021.5.20 Modified and returned
2021.5.21 Accepted
The review speed is always quite fast, the reviews are thorough, and the suggestions are professional. If it wasn't for my laziness in delaying the first round of revisions until the new year, perhaps the process would have been faster.

cuidingsong 2021-05-26

If there is room for modification, there is a chance.

心想事成 2021-05-24

Three experts, two major revisions, one rejection, and the editor requested a major revision. Everyone, is there still a chance for this manuscript?

wo 2021-05-16

May I ask how long it takes for everyone to be hired after a minor repair? The handling editor is Jiří Jaromír Klemeš. It has been three weeks for me, and I still haven't received any results.

gsq嘿嘿 2021-05-08

Translation: Received on October 7, 2020,
Revised on January 13, 2021,
Accepted on January 26, 2021.

Apple-Li 2021-04-26

After going through two major revisions, some reviewers are still very diligent. Attached are the records. Wishing the successors success:
2020/10/29 Submission;
2020/12/08 Feedback received, major revision required;
2021/01/25 Submission of Revision 1;
2021/02/26 Feedback received, major revision required;
2021/04/17 Submission of Revision 2;
2021/04/22 Accepted.

ZL 2021-04-23

I'm the same! It's been almost five months and still no news. Just stay calm and composed.

cdw 2021-04-23

May I ask if you were rejected while under review? It has been almost 5 months for me too, and I haven't received any updates. I sent a reminder once, but didn't receive a reply. I suppose I'm in the same situation as you...

爱吃牛肉拌饭的小桃树 2021-04-23

Super slow! After waiting for five months, it was rejected. The reason for rejection was that they couldn't find reviewers (original text below). The key issue is that the journal I submitted to is in a declining state, despite my research being in a popular field of energy.

We apologize for the inconvenience, but unfortunately, we were unable to find enough reviewers to evaluate your manuscript. We don't want to further delay the process for you.

语丝忆江 2021-04-23

I would like to ask you: how long after acceptance can it be retrieved?

wangjhoo 2021-04-20

This is my first submission. How long does the Staff check process usually take?

V逐梦之光V 2021-04-16

Energy is still a top-tier journal in the fields of energy, thermodynamics, and other related areas. It has a wide range of submissions and, in the current era of new energy dominance, it still focuses on high-quality articles related to traditional energy, particularly combustion thermodynamics. It is a top journal in the field of thermodynamics. The review process may have varying lengths, with an average acceptance period of approximately six months and the first review taking anywhere from 2 to 4 months. If you urgently need to submit an article, please do so carefully. Although the review process may not be short, some reviewers are very thorough and helpful in improving the article. Let's exchange ideas with friends who are working on combustion-related topics.

大学明德 2021-04-08

Feb 4, 2021 - Submitted
Feb 6, 2021 - With editor
Feb 8, 2021 - Under review
Mar 15, 2021 - Revision
Apr 6, 2021 - Revision submitted
Apr 6, 2021 - With editor
Apr 8, 2021 - Accept

老詹 2021-04-07

Now, with the editor, there has been no progress for 30 days. I've reminded them once, but it was futile.

appleman 2021-03-30

2020.12.23 submit
2020.12.25 under review
2021.1.22 major revision: one minor, two major (2.5 months)
2021.3.16 review submit
2021.3.29 accept

My first paper in SCI, the review speed was very fast, probably because it was recommended by the EBE conference special issue. Two of the three reviewers praised the work, and one provided nearly ten suggestions, with the last one citing his three articles. Because I couldn't conduct simulations at home during the winter break, the revision took nearly two months, but luckily I was given ample time for the revisions. It is really not easy to publish a Tier 1 article purely based on simulations. Thanks to ENERGY and the reviewers, and I hope the journal will continue to improve.

ymym 2021-03-26

November 2019: Submission
August 2020: Received reviewer comments, major revisions
October 26, 2020: Uploaded revised manuscript
December 2020: Received second round of reviewer comments
January 17, 2021: Uploaded revised manuscript
March 6, 2021: Received third round of reviewer comments, minor revisions (updated references from the past year)
March 14, 2021: Submitted
March 19, 2021: Accepted

努力码字的小企鹅 2021-03-26

How are you doing now?

努力码字的小企鹅 2021-03-26

Congratulations, it's really not easy.

独孤求爱007 2021-03-22

March 11 submission, rejected on March 21, the editor asked for resubmission.