Q2以上是常态 2023-05-17

The speed can be said to be very slow, as if other contributors did not have the twists and turns as I did. I remember submitting it in October 2022, and it was not until February 2023 that I found reviewers. The two reviewers gave dozens of modification suggestions in mid-March. We have already made the necessary revisions and sent it back. On April 20th, the status changed to "decision in process", and it has been nearly a month since then. I don't know what the situation is and if "decision in process" for so long is a bad sign. I also don't know if I should remind them to review it.

逃跑计划 2023-05-11

Under review, the time changed three times, which were 5.8, 5.9, and 5.10.

逃跑计划 2023-05-11

At that time, I removed reference 37 and then the editor told me to reduce it to below 20 before submitting. Mainly, this content is the next step of work based on the previously published content, which resulted in some repetitive sentence expressions.

笑笑 2023-05-11

May I ask what is the repetition rate of this? I can't lower it anymore, it's too difficult.

逃跑计划 2023-05-09

4.27 reject reason: high similarity rate
5.1 resubmitted to journal
5.2 with editor
5.3 status changed to submitted to journal
5.5 with editor
5.5 sent back to author
5.5 submitted to journal
5.6 with editor
5.8 under review
Too difficult, I hope to be given a chance to revise.

逃跑计划 2023-05-09

4.27 reject Reason: High similarity rate
5.1 Modified and submitted to journal
5.2 with editor
5.3 Status changed to submitted to journal
5.5 with editor
5.5 Sent back to author
5.5 Submitted to journal
5.6 with editor
5.8 Under review
It's too difficult, I hope to be given a chance to make modifications.

独立元素 2023-05-06

First time submitting to this journal: Submitted on January 16, 2023 and it has been "Under Review" until today, May 6. Should I remind them about my submission or should I continue to wait? Anybody else had a similar situation? Thank you!

笑笑 2023-05-05

Excuse me, does this journal currently require payment? I saw on this website that it is non-OA, but the journal's homepage indicates a fee of $2600 USD. What's going on?

ChangKong 2023-05-04

5.4 reject

Because the basic data quantity is insufficient.

ChangKong 2023-05-01

It's so painful, I hope it can be smoothly reviewed.

ChangKong 2023-05-01

The investment total environmental assessment was rejected, and the editorial department suggested that I switch to ecological indicators.
Submitted on 4.29
With the editor on 4.30

Taufik8 2023-04-28

4.23 revise: This means to review or make changes to something.
4.28 revise submitted: This means to review or make changes to something that has been previously submitted.

yjx930 2023-04-26

May I ask, is it under review?

逃跑计划 2023-04-24

It was reviewed so quickly.

逃跑计划 2023-04-24

Take note, second article, submitted on 4.22, with editor on 4.23, praying for everything to go smoothly!

JUAN_789 2023-04-23

The translation of the text is: "What does this mean? Let me answer this question. It means that your revised manuscript has been received. Just wait, the editor will reconsider whether to publish it. You will only know if it has been accepted when you see the words 'congratulations!' and 'accepted'. Haha, good luck! I am in a similar situation."

康帅 2023-04-20

The text translates to: "The second review gave 15 days for revision. After uploading the complete document, a confirmation email with this message was received: Your revised manuscript was received for reconsideration for publication in Ecological Indicators. What does it mean?"

康帅 2023-04-20

Your revised manuscript has been given 15 days for revision in the second review. After uploading the complete file, the confirmation email contains this message. What does it mean?

康帅 2023-04-20

The second round of revisions was given a 15-day modification period. After uploading the completed document, the confirmation email contained this message. What does it mean?

1320970027 2023-04-20

Excuse me everyone, does submitting to this journal require the construction or use of a specific index?

1320970027 2023-04-20

Did you make the revisions according to the request of the first reviewer you mentioned? I also have similar opinions, but I feel it's difficult to make the changes. I'm wondering if I should just pass it off. Haha.

geochemical gui 2023-04-17

During the external review period, shouldn't it only show "Under review"? How can we see the number of reviewers and whether they have accepted the review? (laughing and crying)

geochemical gui 2023-04-17

You can send an email to the editorial department and ask.

geochemical gui 2023-04-16

Is this speed not normal?

Y L 2023-04-14

4.2 Submission
4.5 With editor
Until now, it has always been with editor.
Now it's so slow, is there something wrong with the operation?

加一777 2023-04-03

I am under review for 2.04, and 4.3 is still under review.

Taufik8 2023-04-01

Mar 30, 2023 Submitted
Mar 31, 2023 Under Review

Lips111 2023-03-29

The submission process went smoothly, and the editor was very efficient in handling it. There were three reviewers: one minor revision, one major revision, and one rejection. The rejection acknowledged the research's innovation but deemed it inappropriate for the journal's field. The editor provided an opportunity for revision, without specifying the extent. After the revision, the first two reviewers accepted the paper within two weeks. The reviewer who previously rejected the paper did not provide any feedback for almost a month, so the editor directly accepted the paper. Unfortunately, the reviewer's input was not utilized. Thank you to the editor.

独立元素 2023-03-22

2023.1.19 Under Review till 3.22, is this status and speed normal?

努力发sci123 2023-03-21

Posted on January 7th
Received first-round review results on February 6th. Three reviewers, two positive opinions, one negative opinion, major revisions required.
Returned on March 5th. Minor revisions provided on the 16th.
Returned on March 20th. Accepted on the same day.