松林。 2022-04-19

1.27 submission
2.21 major revision, three reviewers, one top 5% (major revision), one top 30% (minor revision), one suggested transfer to AIS, editor assigned major revision.
4.03 revised
4.15 minor revision, not sent to the reviewer for transfer, the first reviewer is very satisfied and recommends direct publication, the second reviewer raises a question that we missed in the first round, which made him a little angry.
4.17 return for minor revision
4.19 editor accepts directly
Overall, very lucky. We are a small research group from non-prestigious schools and have never had an article with an impact factor of more than 10. As mentioned before, AM looks at connections, if the connections are not good, it's difficult to get published. However, the fact proves that as long as the article has strong innovative points, the editor will still like it. During the submission process, there was a clear sense of favoritism from the editor towards the article. Everyone, keep up the good work.

康康521 2022-03-14

2022.2.12 Submission
2022.2.21 Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, editor gives one month to make changes
2022.3.05 Return for revisions
2022.3.11 Acceptance
The editor is very efficient, whether it is sending for review or the reviewers' feedback, there is progress within a few days.

Jumpdowner 2022-03-08

2022.01.03 Submission;
2022.01.28 Review comments are out, two reviewers suggest revisions and acceptance, the editor gives one month for major revisions;
2022.02.23 Revised submission;
2022.03.01 Accepted.
The process was fast, and I am very satisfied. Will come again next time.

科研gou 2021-12-30

2021.06.21 Submission;
2021.07.28 First review with 2 reviewers, one rejection and one minor revision, editor gave rejection based on reviewer's opinion. Spent an additional 2 months on experiments based on the reviewers' suggestions, plus 1 month for organizing and modifying the content;
2021.11.03 Resubmission
2021.11.25 Second review with 3 reviewers, one suggested acceptance, one suggested minor revision, and one suggested major revision, editor gave 9 days for major revision;
2021.12.03 Revised submission
2021.12.29 Acceptance
Overall, the review process by AM was very strict, and the questions raised by the reviewers were indeed very helpful, significantly improving the overall quality of the article. I am grateful to them. Additionally, the review speed by AM was fast and really good. If there is a chance, I will come back again.

川大小刘文博 2021-12-20

Brother, please explain what happens next.

川大小刘文博 2021-12-20

Full of joy, submitted on December 18, hoping for approval.

金隅 2021-12-10

May I ask how you found out that there are already two review comments?

Weijer17 2021-12-09

Received two opinions, still waiting for the third opinion, one is to switch, the other is a minor fix, hoping the third one is a bit luckier, this speed is too slow.

热比 2021-11-28

2021_11_12 post, waiting for messages, second piece in the morning, wish myself good luck!

忘川 2021-11-15

The following text translates to English as: "Rejection was fast. Submitted on November 9th, 2021. Rejected on November 15th, 2021. Suggested submission to Advanced Materials Interfaces. We are working on molecular sieve catalysis."

金隅 2021-11-14

11.8 submission, seeking good luck!

骑着毛驴去赶集 2021-11-08

On the day you receive this, I will make a bet, hoping to win.

lgxu1987 2021-11-03

2021.09.08 Submission
2021.09.22 First round of revisions, three reviewers, two recommend publication, one major revision
2021.10.21 Revised according to the feedback
2021.11.03 Accepted
The process was very fast, but the requirement for novelty was high. We worked on this for two years, and although our submission was rejected by the journal, we are still very happy to have it accepted by AM (presumably referring to a different journal or conference).

benzhang 2021-11-02

2020.9.4 submit
2020.10.19 submit the revised manuscript
2020.10.29 accept

Pisco 2021-10-25

Three people gave me feedback, one with a minor change, one with a major change, and one with a crucial detail that wasn't understood. Additionally, the request made was to help me advance towards Nature. I followed the suggestions given by this person and submitted the revised work to Nature Nanotechnology. Excited, my friend!

Weijer17 2021-10-22

It has been almost four months and still no news.

Weijer17 2021-10-22

No news since July 15th submission.

余小罩 2021-10-21

I also applied on September 27th, and there is still no news. Let's hope for good luck for everyone!

Pisco 2021-10-18

Submitted on September 27th, there has been no notification of review or a first-instance decision as of October 18th.

Sun-1771328 2021-10-15

It has been a month since the first revision, and there is still no news.

YSYS 2021-08-13

5.30 Submission.
6.24 Review comments, 2 reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, editor suggests major revision.
7.19 Respond to review comments.
8.2 Acceptance.
The speed is much faster than expected, hoping for continuous improvement.

盖世 2021-08-09

Thank you for sharing your experience. As of today, it has been one week since I submitted my application and I have not received a rejection letter yet. I am currently waiting.

Rayon 2021-08-09

From submission to before major revisions, it will show "under consideration." Basically, if there is no news after one week of submission, it is most likely under review.

王铁钢 2021-08-09

AM is awesome, I would like to submit an article. Can any expert provide guidance? For example, what should I pay attention to?

盖世 2021-08-09

I would like to inquire if there will be email notifications from the submission process to the review process. Will the status change once it is under review, "Under consideration"?

Rayon 2021-08-08

2021.05.13 Submission
2021.06.21
Three reviewers, two gave outstanding importance (Top 5% in the subject area), one gave moderate. The editor requested major revisions within 10 days.
2021.06.29 Revised manuscript submitted.
2021.08.07 Two reviewers felt that some questions were not answered and suggested submitting to Advanced Materials Interfaces.

It's a bit disappointing to be rejected at the revision stage. It is suggested to follow the reviewers' advice and supplement the experiments, even if they may seem unnecessary. This experience helps us understand that AM requires not only novel materials but also a wide readership. The chances of acceptance are higher if the research is related to current trends (e.g., covid, immunology).

zyxq 2021-07-28

This year, it took over two months to receive an article, from receiving it online.

Hongliang Chang 2021-07-28

Will there be any changes in the status after submission for review, or will it always remain as "under consideration"?

YSYS 2021-07-25

How long does it usually take from receiving to publication?

lalala12359 2021-07-23

I have been waiting for two months, but there is no news about the first trial. What is the situation? Things have been very slow recently?