认证评论 - ADVANCED MATERIALS
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

高处不胜寒啊 2023-04-25

Brenton Hammer is a really good editor.

TYCJR 2023-04-22

It has been more than ten days and it is still "manuscript submitted".. Does this mean the manuscript is lost?

penguin 2023-04-15

It is already the tenth day now, and my manuscript is still submitted. I am worried.

catator 2023-04-14

This should be for review, right?

Boochi Xin 2023-04-13

The text translates to: "Submitted on 4.3, then after two days with the editor, Under Review on 4.9. Is this status for review or still in the hands of the editor?"

不倦的飞鸟 2023-04-12

It took a week before my submission was changed to "with editor", and now it has been another two weeks and three days, and it is still "with editor". Is my manuscript really that difficult to decide on?

BME2023 2023-04-12

It's okay, my 7th day just turned into "Under review". Keep going!

BME2023 2023-04-12

Now the review cycle of AM is getting slower and slower.

penguin 2023-04-12

I have been waiting for six days. From submission until now, the status is still "manuscript submitted". I don't know what's going on.

LIZHUOBME 2023-04-11

2.8 Submitted
2.15 Under review
Until now
It has been almost 2 months since submission for review, and there has been no news at all. I have no idea what has happened and I am completely confused.

神经蛙蛙 2023-04-11

Came back on March 25th, one with 30%, one with 15%, one with 50%, and got rejected.

wang19931003 2023-04-08

Classmate, have you received the review comments?

hongpengz 2023-03-29

1. Submitted on January 31st.
2. Major revision requested on February 28th.
3. Under review since March 17th.

wang19931003 2023-03-28

Has the feedback on the manuscript come back?

wang19931003 2023-03-28

Has your review feedback come back?

wang19931003 2023-03-28

Has the review comments come back now?

wang19931003 2023-03-28

Very good, hope to win.

丹丹 2023-03-26

Why is there still no movement after more than a week of submission?

xujianhua 2023-03-21

1.31 submit
2.1 under review
2.28 revision (Received, minor revisions, major revisions, all in the top 15%)
3.16 submit, under review on the same day
3.21 accept

2025nature 2023-03-20

"Until now"

神经蛙蛙 2023-03-17

2.27 Submission
2.28 Under review
Until now
Accumulating good karma, wishing me good luck!!

木菇 2023-03-17

3.8 until now for rework... Oops, my apologies, praying for blessings.

木菇 2023-03-17

Rework, three reviewers, one not so good, two are okay, major revision... No news since 2.8 for the rework, feeling anxious.

SCI的忠实粉丝 2023-03-12

Review
2.07, 2023 submitted
2.10, 2023 with editor
2.11, 2023 under review
2.28, 2023 1 minor, 1 accept, 7 days revised time
3.05, 2023 resubmitted
3.05, 2023 accepted
3.11, 2023 online

Translation:
2.07, 2023 submitted
2.10, 2023 with editor
2.11, 2023 under review
2.28, 2023 1 minor, 1 accept, 7 days revised time
3.05, 2023 resubmitted
3.05, 2023 accepted
3.11, 2023 online

skysuperboss 2023-03-10

2022.12.1 Submission
2023.12.21 Major revision (two reviewers, 15%, 15%)
2023.1.10 Revision
2023.1.11 Minor revision (editor's request for polishing)
2023.1.17 Revision
2023.1.17 Acceptance

ray1 2023-03-10

In fact, the submission has a DOI, which is the manuscript number in the submission system.

IvanESE 2023-03-10

When receiving an acceptance email from the editor, will the email include a DOI number?

ray1 2023-03-09

2022.11.13 Submission
2023.1.2 Major Revision (Three reviewers, 5%, 15%, 15% respectively)
2023.2.8 Revised
2023.3.2 Accepted

How long after acceptance will it be online?

madandan123 2023-03-07

When I submitted to AEM, I also encountered a similar situation where a reviewer intentionally found fault. I suggest the OP to appeal, remove that reviewer, and request the editor for a new reviewer arbitration.

YuP.John.B 2023-03-07

12.15 submitted.
12.26 under review
1.19 major revision (2 revisions, 1 rejection)
2.26 revision submitted
3.6 rejection (The person who rejected it was quite malicious, insisting on the "lack of clinical translation" issue (even though the core of the work is nanomaterial design). I wrote a response of over four thousand words specifically for this person, also including additional experiments. However, they responded with an attitude of "I'm not listening, I'm not listening, I don't care.")

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation