NJTECHSZH 2023-07-01

What is the reason? My application has been under review for more than ten days, and there hasn't been any progress.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-07-01

Some reviewers will write their comments in the title section of the review, indicating whether major or minor revisions are needed. The final decision given by the editor is RJC.

长安PHD05 2023-06-30

How can you tell if it is a major repair? I have made two edits but it didn't mention whether it was a major repair or a minor repair.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-29

The original poster is still very lucky. After the repair, it only took 17 days for the process to go through with the editor, under review again, RRC second round, with editor, and decision letter. I don't know if it will be sent for a second round of external review now, as there are not many external experts available. It is a peak period for fund evaluation, which is a voluntary labor.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-29

It seems that everyone is in a slow state.

银与河 2023-06-29

The situation is the same, the chief editor, revised on 5.16, is currently also with no movement.

xxxt 2023-06-29

Has anyone tried to appeal after being rejected, with one reviewer having positive feedback and the other having no comments?

国士无双 2023-06-29

It has been three months since I submitted it, and it is still under review. I hope I can be selected.

国士无双 2023-06-29

Brother, have you ever invested before? It's been three months and you're still waiting for the external audit.

Duan Minghan 2023-06-28

It is becoming increasingly difficult to submit papers.

OAIFB 2023-06-28

The situation is the same. Submitted in January, received first review comments by the end of April. Revised on May 11th and started working with the editor on May 12th until now. The editor is the chief editor.

d 2023-06-28

Is your editor the chief editor? After I returned the manuscript for the first review, it has been 60 days with the editor, and I have reminded three times, but there has been no progress so far. My editor is the chief editor of CBM. Sigh.

槑槑1994 2023-06-28

Did you remind them after 20 days of returning for revision? It has been 55 days since mine was returned for revision and it still says "with editor". I don't know if I can remind them, sigh...

槑槑1994 2023-06-28

Submitted at the end of February, received the reviewer's comments on April 20th (from two reviewers, they provided 20 days for revisions, which can be considered minor revisions). Revised on May 5th, and until now (June 28th), it is still in the "with editor" status. It has been 55 days already. Can I send a reminder for the manuscript?

NJTECHSZH 2023-06-27

The content is very helpful.

LucioZ 2023-06-27

There are not many reviewers, and the initial review process took 5 months. It went through several holidays and Christmas. The manuscript was submitted at the end of November, and it was returned for revisions around the end of May, which took about 15 days (initial review) for the revisions of 2 minor issues. The revised version was then sent for a second round of minor revisions, and it took about 20 days to receive the acceptance! PS: The editorial system automatically sent many reviewers, all with updates, but no one accepted the review! It's too difficult. If there are no major issues in the initial review, there should be a good chance! Thankful to the editor, although it took a long time to process the manuscript, it is probably due to busy work and holidays.

糊里糊涂QX 2023-06-26

2023.05.31 submitted
2023.06.1 with editor
2023.06.26 under review

Wishing you good luck~~~

天问 2023-06-26

Submitted to Journal 2022.08.04
Under review 2022.08.15
Under review around 2022.09.20
Required Review Completed 2022.10.07
Reject 2022.10.09

shiyouren 2023-06-26

5.19 submission
6.20 under review, three reviewers for review

258乐行楼 2023-06-26

6.20 under review. Received an email saying that a reviewer has accepted the manuscript for review, and the status has also changed accordingly.

孤独的黑板擦 2023-06-26

2023.06.23 Submitted
2023.06.24 Under Review
2023.06.25 Two reviewers agreed to review
2023.06.26 Review completed: 1
May I ask, is it normal for a review to be completed this quickly? Does it mean it was rejected outright?

城南花已开 2023-06-25

No external review, the editor accepted it.

chendingshi 2023-06-25

Very slow, I submitted it in September last year, and in May this year, the comments from a reviewer came back saying that the results did not match my content. After making the revisions, I submitted it again and received acceptance notification today.

长安PHD05 2023-06-24

The first article I submitted was in early last year and it was accepted within three months. The one I submitted at the end of this year has been six months and still no response...

bloomying 2023-06-22

It has been so slow since last year!!! Only one reviewer was found for the submission made last year, and it took three months to find one reviewer for the submission made this year.

2023. 3.31 submitted to journal
4.01 with editor
4.10 under review
5.25 under review (Finally found one reviewer)
6.16 under review

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-21

Excuse me, fellow researcher. After revising your paper and sending it for the second round of external review, the revision given on 2.16 should not be of concern (it is to check if any additional modifications or approval for publication are required). I noticed that you submitted it to the journal on 2.17, it reached the editor on 2.18, and it was accepted on the 19th. Did you send the revised version back to the original reviewer for further revisions? I am looking forward to and thank you for your reply.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-21

May I ask, have you submitted your paper for the second round of external review after revising it? Looking forward to and thank you for your reply.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-21

Admiration, may I ask if the second round of external review has been submitted? It's impressive that it was accepted in such a short time from March 16th to March 23rd. Congratulations.

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-21

May I ask who is the handling editor?

在海中学游泳的鱼 2023-06-21

Did you send it for review?