认证评论 - COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

动次打次哒哒哒 2022-05-31

Hello, I would like to ask whether the uploaded manuscript when replying to the reviewer's comments should highlight the modified areas or not. Above, it only says "please upload only the final version of the manuscript." My understanding is that it does not need to be highlighted. Thank you.

动次打次哒哒哒 2022-05-31

Hello, I would like to ask if the manuscript uploaded when replying to the reviewer's comments should highlight the modified areas or not. Only "please upload only the final version of the manuscript" is written above. My understanding is that it does not need to be highlighted.

阿尔德里齐 2022-05-26

2022.5.23 submitted
2022.5.24 with editor

XZN 2022-05-15

Has your submission been reviewed?

君子傲 2022-05-14

5.05 with editor
5.14 with editor
Too slow.

君子傲 2022-05-13

The journal needs to improve the efficiency of manuscript processing. It's too slow.

sduer 2022-05-11

5.2 submit
5.4 with editor
5.11 not yet submitted for review
So slow, hoping for good luck

djkaldjakl 2022-05-08

4.20 with editor

summerli 2022-05-04

2022.01.10 submit
2022.01.11 with editor
2022.02.17 under review
2022.02.17 required reviews completed
2022.03.14 major revise
2022.03.31 with editor
2022.04.01 under review
2022.04.11 required reviews completed
2022.05.03 accept
After experiencing four months, it was finally accepted. Waiting for the results was the most difficult, but there was finally a reward. The reviewers' comments were very professional, and the editor was also good.

致己 2022-05-02

May I ask how many reviewers you have found for this article?

君莫笑沐橙 2022-05-01

The reviewer said that no one has done this in recent years, and it lacks novelty. Sigh.

方明1234 2022-04-28

Has this article been indexed?

悦悦子 2022-04-26

The content of the paper is related to electrical materials/polymers nano-modification.
Submitted on December 24, 2021.
Received reviewers' comments on January 1, 2022 - Reviewer 2's comments were more relevant and easy to address. Reviewer 1's expertise did not align well, and they did not provide substantial comments, just asked me to cite 16 papers from their group. Since those papers were not relevant, I only cited 12 and left out 4.
Received reviewers' comments again on February 18, 2022 - Reviewer 1 continued to request the inclusion of their four unrelated papers...
Accepted on March 6, 2022 (Reviewer 1 noticed that their 16 papers were included and said: "Strongly recommend quick publication.")
Around March 8, 2022 - Publication.

君莫笑沐橙 2022-04-22

4.19 Required Reviews Completed.

蜡笔小新的小白 2022-04-22

The text translates to: "The fifth time this publication has rejected the submission. Good luck to everyone."

皮卡丘!使用电光一闪! 2022-04-20

The manuscript review was fast. After three weeks, RRC asked once and the editor had a good attitude and immediately responded to expedite the processing.

Timeline for reference:
November 23, 2021: Submission
November 28, 2021: Sent for external review
January 16, 2022: Received first review comments, requiring major revisions
February 27, 2022: Submitted revised manuscript, sent for external review on the same day
March 31, 2022: Manuscript review completed by RRC
April 20, 2022: Accepted notification

狼腾 2022-04-20

November 25th submission;
Received major revision comments on February 18th;
Submitted revisions on March 10th;
Received reviewer comments on April 7th, waiting for editor's handling;
Accepted on April 20th.
Overall, it was a pleasant experience, except that the editing process was quite slow. Also, it is suggested not to rush the submission. One senior brother urgently needed to graduate, so he rushed the submission, but the next day the editor gave comments: revise and resubmit. Finally, he sincerely emailed the editor and carefully revised the major revisions, and it was accepted.
Overall, positive feedback, hoping for continuous improvement!

小海11 2022-04-17

May I ask how long it takes for the status to change to "under review" after submitting the manuscript?

hanbb 2022-04-15

10.29 submit
12.17 revise
12.24 submit
12.31 accept
01.03 online

Translation:
10.29 - Submit
12.17 - Revise
12.24 - Submit
12.31 - Accept
01.03 - Online

动次打次哒哒哒 2022-04-05

May I ask what field you are in? Is it a different type of editing? Your review process is so fast, I have already submitted for three weeks and have not received any updates.

动次打次哒哒哒 2022-04-05

I submitted it on March 16th, it's been nearly three weeks and it's still in the hands of the editor. How about yours?

深藏blue。 2022-04-01

Do we need to put the figures and tables at the end of the manuscript as a separate list?

深藏blue。 2022-04-01

Should the figures and tables be placed at the end of the manuscript?

WUHU~ 2022-03-29

Mar 14, 2022 Submitted
Mar 15, 2022 With Editor
I have also been waiting for half a month.

爱举铁的兔子 2022-03-29

I have also been waiting for three weeks, and I am still with the editor. What's going on? It's so slow.

君莫笑沐橙 2022-03-26

3.19 submitted
3.20 with editor
3.26 under review
Prayer

mengone 2022-03-26

This journal is incredibly slow... It has been almost a month since I submitted my manuscript...

crystal ling 2022-03-24

"It has been a whole month since I submitted it to the editor, should I be worried?"

mengone 2022-03-21

Mine is still with the editor..... I also started on March 4th.

cjx0220 2022-03-20

The status hasn't changed, your submission hasn't.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started