linlin01 2022-05-19

I also want to know, approximately how long does the "with editor" stage take?

相信未来666 2022-05-18

Submitted on March 18th, it has been two months now, and it is still with the editor.
I have emailed the editor, but it was of no use. Does anyone know how to make it faster?
I don't mind being rejected, but what annoys me the most is the delay of several months. Even the daylilies have withered.

相信未来666 2022-05-18

What's going on? I submitted on 3.18, but it's still with the editor.

Chio 2022-05-17

Submitted on May 1st, with editor.

危地马拉大西瓜 2022-05-16

Received 2022 1/13 - This means that the mentioned item or document was received on January 13, 2022.

Minor review 2022 3/3 - It signifies that a minor review of the item or document took place on March 3, 2022.

Article revised 2022 4/28 - This indicates that the mentioned article went through a revision process on April 28, 2022.

Accepted 2022 5/8 - This means that the item or document was accepted on May 8, 2022.

linxiao 2022-05-15

Submitted on 4.27, still with editor.

gutilixue 2022-05-14

Just submitted, how long is the review process now?

meng li 2022-05-08

May I ask, OP, what happened to you afterwards? How long after the decision will the next step be taken?

Chang 2022-04-25

Regarding the editor-in-chief, the one on the cover, I can't remember the name ?
Being slow is real ?

handong123 2022-04-24

Excuse me, which editor handled it?

Chang 2022-04-24

Posted in early December 2021, it took more than half a month for the initial review (gently reminded and immediately sent for review ?).
Received the first review in early March 2022, revised it within a week, and sent it for external review another week later.
The second review was completed on April 11th, 2022, and the acceptance notice was given on April 23rd (gently reminded once during this period, but no significant response).
Overall, it feels quite slow ?.

科小研 2022-04-22

It has been more than eight months of continuous submission and review, but there have been no results. I am convinced.

way 2022-04-22

Did you receive the article?

Roderick 2022-04-21

I have not received the review results for 5 months, it is really too slow.

handong123 2022-04-21

This journal is unbelievably slow. It has been half a year since submission, and it is still under review.

qichu 2022-04-20

I submitted it on February 9th, and it is still with the editor.

Joe 2022-04-20

Previously, the submission process usually took about two weeks for review. This time, it has been over two months and it is still with the editor...

shideya 2022-04-18

My status within 5 days: with editor, decision in progress. It should be rejected... I'm already prepared for rejection.

keyan 2022-04-18

I submitted an article to Applied Surface Science, and it received high evaluations from three reviewers. However, it was rejected by the unethical Korean editors, and they ignored my emails.

观天澜 2022-04-17

Just send an email directly to scold him, he's already a PhD who has published multiple papers, isn't he capable enough?

中华田园 2022-04-14

It's a bit funny. The second reviewer's comments on my article are exactly the same as the first reviewer's comments, which were his own comments. Could it be a time and space travel? He copied his own review comments and submitted them for editing again.

shideya 2022-04-14

Indeed, my junior's paper was also delayed for half a year. There were no comments used in the sentence, so it was submitted to another journal and went quite smoothly.

fanys 2022-04-14

2021.9.28 submission;
2021.10.9 under review;
2022.4.11 rejected, with only one sentence from the editor: Authors should submit a new manuscript where they MUST compare with other sources.
After three months, I sent reminders every month, and the replies always said they were waiting for the reviewers' responses or trying to find more reviewers.
After waiting for over six months, the rejection reason was just one illogical sentence from the editor. I don't even know if they read my article. This irresponsible editor and journal have delayed me for half a year without any academic ethics. Their disrespectful attitude towards others' hard work is truly disappointing, especially considering they are a top journal. No wonder they have been stagnant.
Maybe I just had bad luck, but I want to advise those considering submitting to CS journals to be cautious.

观天澜 2022-04-13

Now it's good, no need to say that this journal is slow. After 14 days of submission, it goes directly to "decision in progress". It's hopeless, hahaha.

handong123 2022-04-13

Generally, you can see which editor it is in the review comments. Mine has been reviewed three times, with only one reviewer's comment. It's been going back and forth. After replying to the review comments, the editor-in-chief keeps delaying the review process. They neither accept nor reject it.

Roderick 2022-04-13

It's been 5 months since I submitted the manuscript, and it's been 10 days since then, but there is still no result from the review process. It's incredibly slow and frustrating. This magazine has no professionalism and keeps dragging the pace. They better hurry up and finish it, I can't stand such slow progress anymore.

Zion_95 2022-04-13

The speed is indeed slow, it's been over two months and still with the editor.

观天澜 2022-04-13

How do I know who the editor is? When my submission became "with editor," I sent an email, but the editor's name didn't appear.

handong123 2022-04-12

The speed is really slow, Antonio's efficiency is really poor. Compared to journals of the same level, the efficiency is really slow, it can really drag you down. It is advisable for those in a hurry not to submit.

MYC 2022-04-10

I also encountered it, saying that there is still one reviewer who has not submitted their comments.