认证评论 - Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

你的仿真收敛了么 2022-03-26

It has been 4 months since the submission, with one month being under the editor's evaluation and three months under review. The date has changed once during this period.

超神数学老师 2022-02-04

Has this journal taken a break for the Chinese New Year? It's been over ten days and there hasn't been any news from editor10.

小丰小陈 2022-01-10

More than a month with the editor.

zuhx 2021-12-20

December 18th with editor

你的仿真收敛了么 2021-12-19

It has been 20 days with the editor already, this is too slow. How long has everyone been with the editor?

小丰小陈 2021-12-15

What should I do with the editor all along?

鹜三 2021-11-16

Previously, when I submitted articles, I always encountered rejections from journals citing that the content did not match the paper. This time, I submitted to Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, fearing that they would reject it for the same reason since it was purely theoretical. However, to my surprise, the editor-in-chief and the responsible editor reviewed the manuscript very quickly. It is still necessary for a paper to have innovation for a journal to review it quickly and not reject it for content mismatch. The paper was with the editor for a week and then it showed "decision in process." After that, it displayed "withdraw decision" and a week later it changed to "required review completed." Now I am waiting for the results and hoping for good news!

jinx的微笑 2021-09-26

The first review took five months with two reviewers, both of whom gave positive responses. After making the required revisions, it was accepted! The biggest takeaway is the need for innovation.

jinx的微笑 2021-09-25

Look at current development with a historical perspective.

Sir Lang 2021-09-24

From 1998 to 2006, fewer than 50 articles were published each year. Starting from 2010, there have been at least 300 articles published each year. This year, over 400 articles have already been published, and there is a possibility of surpassing the 500 mark!

肖敏芳 2021-09-17

The speed is relatively slow, but in recent years I feel that CNSNS has improved the quality requirements. I submitted an article and it was not rejected, but the difficulty has obviously increased.

Sscorpio 2021-08-15

How to urge for the manuscript? I haven't even found the place to send emails.

Vibration system 2021-08-13

Seriously doubt that the reviewer has a "xin'guan" condition.

Vibration system 2021-08-13

I have been waiting for 7 months for the submission I made in January, but still haven't received any response. It's already almost autumn, skipping through the entire winter. Sigh...

wtao 2021-08-12

The difficulty of hiring in recent years has clearly increased. Editors usually invite 3-5 reviewers, which is not easy to send out.

polyulimeng 2021-08-04

No change, continuous heartache...

Sscorpio 2021-08-03

Excuse me, is your current article status still "with editor"?

阿宁宁宁宁 2021-08-03

After two weeks, the editor directly rejected it, saying that it lacked innovation. Perhaps the standards of the journal are quite high, but the speed was indeed a bit slow.

polyulimeng 2021-08-01

With editor, have you ever reminded the teacher or classmates for the manuscript? This magazine is really dragging its feet in terms of speed.

贪心的小鱼 2021-07-31

In a few days, it will be five months with no changes. Feeling anxious.

polyulimeng 2021-07-29

Submitted 2021.07.01
With Editor 2021.07.06
During the period of being with the editor, this time was the slowest in terms of speed of the submission to the magazine, feeling frustrated...

polyulimeng 2021-07-29

May I ask how long it takes for your manuscript to be reviewed by the editor after submission? Thank you.

似水流年 2021-07-26

The requirements are much higher than when we were studying, with many reviewers, which greatly increases the difficulty of being accepted. It is good in the field of nonlinear simulation.

jinx的微笑 2021-07-13

No changes happened.

蝉鸣夏至 2021-07-13

Has your Status Date changed? Mine has always been "Under review," but the Status Date has changed twice.

jinx的微笑 2021-07-12

Not yet, it has been over four months now and the situation has not changed.

蝉鸣夏至 2021-07-12

Has the OP received any updates? I have also been waiting for three months and haven't received any news. The status of "under review" has changed once during this period.

King1991 2021-06-22

May I ask, how long does it take to submit with the editor for the first time?

jinx的微笑 2021-06-08

It has been three months since the manuscript was submitted, and there is still no news. I am a little anxious and don't know how many reviewers there are.

月下竹影 2021-03-21

Posted on January 3, 2020, returned with revision comments on September 9, 2020: major revisions. Returned after modifications on December 2020, received review comments on January 26, 2021: minor revisions. Submitted modifications on February 26, 2021, accepted on March 8, 2021, and available for online viewing on March 10, 2021. After proofreading on March 15, formally published on March 20, 2021. The entire submission process took one year and two months. The main reason for the lengthy process was the slow review due to the impact of the pandemic in the early stages, while the handling of revisions was quick in the later stages. The reviewers were highly professional and their comments directly revealed the weaknesses of the article. After careful revisions and supplementing relevant calculations, the quality of the article greatly improved. My article had strong innovative content in its initial version but lacked completeness. The reviewers provided an objective evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now