香无缺冒菜 2022-11-15

The review of this issue is not a big problem; the editors are all very good.

dennnis 2022-11-15

The classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is the biggest blind box, unpredictable, reflecting the profound nature of human beings.

WXFX 2022-11-15

Worried about the end of the year, Zone 3 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

可爱又迷人的反派 2022-11-13

11.13 Submission, the speed is fast. Hope to receive a kind-hearted reviewer.

铁拳男人 2022-11-13

Did the article mention that the additional document was forgotten to be included?

香无缺冒菜 2022-11-13

Editors are always like this, you need to see how they comment on the manuscript.

kyg_1 2022-11-12

The editor didn't mention whether it's a major revision or a minor revision, only said modification. They will reconsider the suggestions. Does it mean there's not much chance? The editor-in-chief is Romain Bordes.

可爱又迷人的反派 2022-11-12

11.11 with editor, Qiuqiu for review.

香无缺冒菜 2022-11-12

Why not wait until Singles' Day and make the investment, hoping for good luck.

可爱又迷人的反派 2022-11-10

11.10 I hope for a good result and wish for a faster speed.

一00 2022-11-09

Does anyone know how to solve this situation? *Please note that the supplementary cited in the text but not provided, kindly provide the same to proceed. I would like to inquire whether similar emails need to be submitted after receiving the article, with the following content:* Please note that I didn't understand which information the Elsevier journal data administrator requires me to provide, what the next step is, and I don't know what to do. I am quite anxious and urgently request any experienced person to help answer my questions.

一00 2022-11-09

Please note that the supplementary parts mentioned in the text have not been provided. Kindly provide the missing information in order to proceed. I am not sure what kind of information the Elsevier journal data administrator requires from me, and I am unsure about the next steps or what to do. I am feeling a bit anxious and would appreciate any help or guidance from experienced individuals who may have encountered a similar situation.

丽丽是个小胖子 2022-11-09

Nov 08, 2022 Under Review

丽丽是个小胖子 2022-11-09

The requested text "Nov 08, 2022" is already in English and represents the date November 8, 2022.

BeyondDF 2022-11-09

Thank you very much, big brother!

好好干饭 2022-11-08

Wait and see if the original poster has received an email after being under review.

丽丽是个小胖子 2022-11-08

11/8 with editor translates to "November 8th with editor" in English.

香无缺冒菜 2022-11-06

Isn't this for sure? Regardless of whether you can or not, answer it correctly or not, you have to respond and save the situation.

铁拳男人 2022-11-06

Tiezi, is it necessary to provide a point-to-point response to each reviewer when replying to the revised manuscript? My editor also made a lot of comments.

香无缺冒菜 2022-11-06

The second review of the article was accepted directly. The second review was also shown to the reviewers, and the results will be provided within ten days. Both reviewers recommended direct publication. There was a reviewer before who kept asking me to do additional testing, but I didn't do it. Among them, there was a test that I must be given. I argued with reason by citing references, and it was directly published as well. Thanks to my advisor, editor, and reviewers. Good luck to everyone!

香无缺冒菜 2022-11-06

You can see my previous reply. There are two types of marked manuscripts: one is highlighted with a colored background, and the other is marked with a regular font color.

liupu 2022-11-05

11/5Nov 05, 2022 summit Submitted to Journal

Translation: The summit held on November 5th, 2022 was submitted to the Journal.

Taqiangrentaqiang 2022-11-05

Surfactant direction. This journal has a fast pace, and it typically requires reviewers to complete the first review within 21 days and the second review within 14 days. When approaching the deadline, multiple reminder emails will be sent to prompt reviewers to submit their opinions. The difficulty of submission is much lower compared to JCIS, Langmuir, and ACS AMI.

BeyondDF 2022-11-05

When submitting the revised draft, here are three manuscripts for submission. There was a mistake on the top.

BeyondDF 2022-11-04

Please submit three revised manuscripts. I know one of them is an unmarked text, one is a text with highlighted changes, and what is the third revised manuscript? What are the differences between "Revised Manuscript [Unmarked Text]," "Revised Manuscript [Changes highlighted]," and "Revised Manuscript [marked Version]? Does anyone know? Thank you, expert.

铁拳男人 2022-11-04

Abnormal, probably you entered the wrong email address.

好好干饭 2022-11-03

Did not send the track link to the corresponding author, really don't understand.

right now 2022-11-03

Sent the track link to the corresponding author, you can click on it to view the real-time status.

好好干饭 2022-11-02

"Under review" does not have a link? Is it normal not to receive an email? Did you all receive emails for the review process?

好好干饭 2022-11-02

"Under review" does not have a link? Is it normal not to receive an email?