hahahaha 2022-06-03

What does the initial editorial review mean?

mark_lee 2022-06-02

Hello, may I ask if CPB is currently charging for page fees? What are the approximate standards? Also, how long does it take from the acceptance stage to the proof stage?

mark_lee 2022-06-02

Excuse me, does CPB charge layout fees now? What are the approximate criteria? And how long does it take from the acceptance stage to the proof stage?

西瓜98 2022-05-31

In the given LaTeX template, there are certain parts that need to be modified by oneself.

qiqisun 2022-05-25

Do you have a format for exporting documents? I couldn't find it in EndNote.

西瓜98 2022-05-25

Received Editor 2022-03-15
Editor Preliminary Review Editor 2022-03-15
Peer Review Reviewer 2022-03-15
Editorial Board Re-Review 2022-03-30
Re-Peer Review Reviewer 2022-04-22
EIC Final Decision EIC 2022-05-05
Accepted Editor 2022-05-18

Translation:
Received Editor 2022-03-15
Editor Preliminary Review Editor 2022-03-15
Peer Review Reviewer 2022-03-15
Editorial Board Re-Review 2022-03-30
Re-Peer Review Reviewer 2022-04-22
EIC Final Decision EIC 2022-05-05
Accepted Editor 2022-05-18

qwe13579 2022-05-18

The reviewer's comments are very fair, and the speed of returning the revised manuscript is also very fast. It was a very good submission experience.

时线 2022-04-21

Hello, may I ask how much is the layout fee?

zhiweiyule 2022-03-23

After the external audit is completed, when preparing for the final review, a request for the transfer of copyright agreement will be required.

红色叶子 2022-03-15

I would like to ask, is your copyright agreement uploaded only after external review?

zhiweiyule 2022-01-25

Stage Name Handler Submission Time Estimated Completion Time Actual Completion Time Comments
Receipt Editor 2021-12-23 2021-12-24 2021-12-23
Initial Editing Review Editor 2021-12-23 2022-01-06 2021-12-23
Initial Editing Review Editor 2021-12-23 2022-01-07 2021-12-23
External Review Initial Review Reviewer 2021-12-23 2022-01-15 2022-01-02
External Review Initial Review Reviewer 2021-12-23 2022-01-15 2022-01-06
Editorial Board Review Editorial Board 2022-01-07 2022-01-14 2022-01-08
Editorial Review Editor
Acceptance Editor 2022-01-24

书呆子AAA 2022-01-17

Initial review by editor: 2020-11-28 to 2020-12-13, deadline: 2020-11-30
Initial review by reviewer: 2020-12-07 to 2020-12-30, deadline: 2020-12-23
Initial review by reviewer: 2021-01-07 to 2021-01-30, deadline: 2021-01-29
Secondary review by editor
Secondary review by reviewer: 2021-03-03 to 2021-03-19, deadline: 2021-03-15
Secondary review by reviewer: 2021-03-03 to 2021-03-19, deadline: 2021-03-16
Final review by editor: 2021-03-16, deadline: 2021-03-23
Accepted by editor

cccherry 2021-12-14

Submission: 2021-11-01
Editor's initial review: 2021-11-01 to 2021-11-02
External reviewer's initial review: 2021-11-02 to 2021-11-12
External reviewer's initial review: 2021-11-02 to 2021-11-06
Editorial board's secondary review: 2021-11-12
Editor's secondary review: Editor
External reviewer's secondary review: 2021-11-28 to 2021-11-29
Chief editor's final review: 2021-12-14
Accepted

This is my first submission, and the journal responded very quickly! I received the review comments after about two weeks of submission, took over two weeks to revise the paper, and the chief editor's final review took half a month before it was finally accepted. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal~~~

yinghan 2021-11-22

My situation is also that there are not enough experiments. I received two opinions from reviewers, one is rejection, and the other is suggesting acceptance after revision. The editor kindly provided major revisions, but I don't think my chances are high. I digressed... it depends on whether the reviewers all think that there aren't enough experiments.

Ptkk 2021-11-19

May I ask if there have been any rejections due to lack of experiments for a simulation work that has been done?

资深柚子 2021-09-17

Editing and processing manuscripts is done in a timely manner, with the main difficulty depending on the reviewers. Of course, occasionally one may come across a reviewer who doesn't seem to know what they are saying.

三天写出SCI 2021-08-16

Submitted on July 3rd, received minor revisions on July 28th. Revised on August 9th, entered final review by the editor on the 12th, and accepted on August 16th. I have to say, the efficiency of the journal is really high!

uestcwwzz 2021-08-12

Submission received on May 28, 2021.
Initial review by editor on May 28, 2021.
External review initial review on May 30, 2021, to June 22, 2021.
External review initial review on June 22, 2021, to July 16, 2021.
Minor revisions.
Revised submission submitted on July 28, 2021, to July 30, 2021.
Final review by editor on July 30, 2021.
Accepted.

It's not fast, mainly because the direction is too narrow. We had to find reviewers twice, and it seemed like the reviewers were chosen from a general pool, so their opinions were not particularly professional. However, the editor's processing speed is really fast.

Chrisss 2021-06-04

Received 2021-4-8
Initial review by editor 2021-4-8
External review preliminary review 2021-4-8 2021-4-19
External review preliminary review 2021-4-11 2021-5-2
Editorial re-examination
External review re-examination 2021-5-24 2021-6-1
Final review by editor-in-chief 2021-6-2
Accepted
The biggest advantage is its speed!! The first review comments were received in just over 20 days, and the revisions took less than three weeks. The final acceptance process took less than two months in total. The suggested revisions from the reviewers were also meaningful. Overall, it was a great submission experience.

好运相伴 2021-05-31

Submit CPB, the article belongs to the development of an instrument, involving optics. Originally, the opinions of the two reviewers were not significant, just superficial opinions. However, one of the reviewers suggested a change in submission, so the editor rejected it. There have been others in the same field as mine who have submitted to CPB, and I have also cited them. It's only me who was asked to change the submission, I really don't understand. In the comments below, many people were told by the reviewers that their articles were not suitable for CPB. To the CPB reviewers or potential reviewers, please don't always ask people to change their submission, it's a waste of time. Do you think only your articles are suitable for CPB? Should CPB only be submitted by you in the future? Many of those who submit to CPB are master's or doctoral students. It's already difficult to conduct an experiment and publish a small article, just for the sake of graduation. If it's not completely unsuitable for CPB, please don't casually ask people to change their submission.

ecedede 2021-05-30

Does this journal have a publication fee?

EchoZhang 2021-04-23

Hello, the author. I would like to ask if there are any fees from reviewing to acceptance. I also submitted to CPB and am currently in the stage of revising the review comments.

YJL202104 2021-04-18

Hello, I'm in the same situation as you. I'm waiting for the DOI number for the accepted manuscript.

YJL202104 2021-04-18

Hello, I'm in the same situation as you, waiting for the DOI number.

wodeweizai 2021-04-17

Hello. Yes, I am still in the processing stage of employment and have not received a DOI number yet.

YJL202104 2021-04-16

Hello, elder brother OP. I would like to inquire about the situation. Are you currently stuck at the hiring process, or have you already submitted the manuscript?

YJL202104 2021-04-16

Hello, big brother. May I ask if you are currently stuck in the hiring process or have already submitted the manuscript?

wodeweizai 2021-04-12

Submission: 2021-02-02
Initial editor review: 2021-02-02
External review initial review: 2021-02-03 - 2021-03-03
External review initial review: 2021-02-03 - 2021-02-27
Editorial re-review: -
External review re-review: 2021-03-24 - 2021-04-06
External review re-review: 2021-03-24 - 2021-03-24
Final editor review: 2021-04-06
Accepted

I decided to submit to a domestic journal and took on a significant workload. Surprisingly, the process was quite fast. I hope the magazine continues to improve.

annhappy 2021-03-22

Do I need to follow its official website's Word template and enter the template in the designated box?

MWH 2021-02-04

First experience with a domestic magazine, I applied for a small job. The first review took a week, but neither of the two reviewers provided any meaningful comments. I made the revisions in one day and submitted it again, and the second review took two weeks before it was accepted. I have to say, CPB is quite efficient in terms of speed, but I still hope to find some professional peers for the review process. I wish the domestic publications continue to improve steadily.