三冬 2022-10-01

I don't know, but overall it's slower, maybe it's just my slowness.

橙子很愤怒 2022-09-30

It's already been three months, so long.

三冬 2022-09-30

The opinion has returned, major overhaul.

三冬 2022-09-28

Is there still no news now?

学术闲人 2022-09-21

Still under review, sigh.

各环节说道 2022-09-20

The journal requires certain innovation, and I had hesitations before submitting. Nonetheless, I am grateful for the modification suggestions provided by the second reviewer.
Submitted on 8.18
With editor on 8.19
Rejected on 9.17

NeuChow 2022-09-19

9.4 required review completed translates to "Review required on 9.4 completed."
转 decision in process translates to "Transitioning to decision in process."
9.9 major review 两个审稿人 一大修一小修 translates to "9.9 major review with two reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision."

Raes 2022-09-18

8.27 Major Revise
9.8 With Editor to Under Review How much longer until acceptance? Does anyone have hxd's experience to share?

三冬 2022-09-18

Have you received any news? Have you given any opinions?

NeuChow 2022-09-17

It should be having the company that previously helped you with proofreading provide you with a proofreading certificate, and then you can put it in the "response to reviewers". I didn't use the official proofreading service from Elsevier, but I still passed.

wzr 2022-09-15

Hello, I am Xiao Xiu. The editor-in-chief suggested that I use the revised version from Aisiwei to submit the proof. Do I still need to revise it? Is he just used to saying this or does it actually have a problem? In fact, I have already revised it once with a cheaper option.

By_u_side 2022-09-12

May I ask if your revision is just a revision? Is there no major or minor revision? My editor gave me a revise, and I don't even know if it's a major or minor revision. I am confused, I have never seen this before.

By_u_side 2022-09-11

What does "revise" mean in the comments for the manuscript? Isn't it usually "major revision" or "minor revision"? What does this mean?

superhero 2022-09-08

I feel that the review process of this journal is quite fast, but the feedback on the review comments is slow.

By_u_side 2022-09-06

I am too, still no result.

耿耿 2022-09-06

July 7th under review, still no feedback until now.

By_u_side 2022-09-06

Thank you, I am a communication, I haven't received the email, it has been almost a month.

学术闲人 2022-09-06

You need to check if you are the corresponding author. If you are the corresponding author, the journal will send you a link to track your submission.

By_u_side 2022-09-06

May I ask how to check the number of reviewers and whether the external review is completed? Thank you!

学术闲人 2022-09-06

7.28 Submission
8.1 Under review
8.26 Two reviewers completed the review
9.6 Currently still under review, from two reviewers to three reviewers, all review comments have been completed, but for some reason, the status still shows "under review"
Hope to get the results soon.

三冬 2022-08-29

Not yet out, waiting.

要投一区 2022-08-29

Has your height opinion come back?

三冬 2022-08-28

The first submission in the MSEA field does not meet the requirements and was directly rejected. Then I submitted to JAC, but there was no news for two months, and no one reviewed it. I couldn't withdraw the submission, so now I have submitted to Guo Tao.
6-19 submitted
6-25 under review
I hope this one can be processed quickly. Good luck.

NeuChow 2022-08-24

8.21 under review - This means that something is currently being reviewed or evaluated as of August 21st.
8.24 required review completed转under review - This indicates that a required review was completed on August 24th, and now it is being transferred or changed to "under review" status again.

橙子很愤怒 2022-08-18

How did you respond to the opinions of the rejector? Did he change his opinion in the second review?

wafmng 2022-08-11

Last month, I just got one article published, and this time I wanted to continue. I found one with fast speed, and it turned out to be really fast. I submitted it on the same day and got rejected on the same day. The reason was that there were too many submissions, and it was signed by the editorial department. There shouldn't be any problem with plagiarism check, so it might be because it doesn't quite fit the direction of the journal.

wafmng 2022-08-11

Two reviewers, one of whom provided positive feedback and pointed out language issues, while the other gave four comments and requested a small experiment to be conducted, none of which are considered too difficult.

3篇Sci 2022-08-10

Hello, how many reviewers are you, and how many comments are there in total?

wafmng 2022-08-10

4.08 Submission with editor
5.17 Under review
6.04 Review comments returned, major revisions
7.01 Submitted revised manuscript
7.07 Accepted

The process with the editor lasted for over a month, which was quite torturous.

柠檬茶 2022-08-09

Is there a template for the National Ceramics? Or should I adjust it according to the given Submission checklist?