寒江孤雁 2023-04-24

The following text is translated into English: "My plagiarism rate is lower than 20%, but I was directly rejected, and they said it was because I submitted too many articles! Did I offend this editor?!"

小裴无敌 2023-04-23

For journals that require plagiarism checks, if the duplication rate is high, the editor will directly reject the submission.

浇注料大王 2023-04-19

2023.4.13 Submission
2023.4.14 With editor
2023.4.17 Under review

sw 2023-04-19

Two articles have been accepted this year. One was submitted in October and the other in November last year. The chief editor assigned each article to different editors for review and they were accepted after revisions.

已投被接收 2023-04-17

March 26th submission
March 28th with editor
March 29th under review
April 8th under review

王小芳 2023-04-17

The submission was sent for review the next day after it was submitted. The editing efficiency is very high. There are two reviewers, both are minor revisions, and it takes one month to be accepted. Now it has been promoted to Zone 1, hoping that Guo Tao will continue to improve.

减肥开始 2023-04-17

Brother, did you finally submit it for review? I have been in the process of reworking it for almost two weeks, and it is still "with editor." They haven't even assigned me to a specific editor.

已投被接收 2023-04-15

Excuse me, does the original poster have any news now?

寒江孤雁 2023-04-14

I have submitted several times this year, but all have been rejected! Looking at the comments section, everyone is saying their articles were sent for review, but mine were not. They said it was because of a high submission rate! The editorial team directly rejected my article without even assigning an editor! What is going on!! It's so difficult to even submit a article now!

MRB 2023-04-10

What's the situation with the boss afterwards?

Till-I 2023-04-07

The second round, one reviewer also agreed and accepted it. Thank you to the editor-in-chief for the fast processing speed.

kongnizao 2023-04-06

The editor I assigned is also this person, Xiao Hu. This editor seems to usually handle the manuscripts on Saturdays and Sundays. After the chief editor approves them, they are then sent to other editors for review.

科研小白一个 2023-04-06

Reviewed after a week, with two rounds of edits in between.

青衫衫衫 2023-04-06

Is your situation similar to mine? Did the original poster submit for review?????

青衫衫衫 2023-04-06

Can someone who understands explain it? I'm afraid I'll be rejected if I wait for 1-2 weeks. I'm annoyed!

青衫衫衫 2023-04-06

Those who understand, please explain. I'm afraid that if I wait for 1-2 weeks, I will be rejected. It's really frustrating!

青衫衫衫 2023-04-06

In the past, it usually took about 1-2 days to know if it could be sent for review. Now, it has been 8.9 days and it is still "with editor". I don't know what's going on. Does anyone have any information about this? There was a change in editors at one point, and the current editor is Xiao Hu. Does anyone have any knowledge about this editor?

BOXINYAU 2023-04-05

Did you submit it for review in the end?

Till-I 2023-04-05

Excuse me everyone, if there is only one reviewer who agrees to review the repair, is it up to the editor to decide how to handle this situation?

强行吃火锅 2023-04-04

2023.4.3 under review..

Translation: The date 3rd April 2023 is currently under review.

Qinglong Cai 2023-04-03

I will also make a note of it.
Submitted on April 3, 2023.
With the editor on the same day.

&冬季 2023-03-30

Received, thank you!

布袋袋 2023-03-27

1.10 Submitted
1.11 With Editor
1.14 Required Review Completed
1.21 Under Review
2.8 Under Review
2.14 Required Review Completed
2.27 Required Review Completed
2.28 Decision in Process
2.28 Major Revision
3.20 Submit 转 With editor
3.21 Under Review
3.21 Required Review Completed
3.22 Required Review Completed
3.24 Required Review Completed
3.26 Decision in Process
3.27 Accept
Editor is Pietro Vincenzini

Raes 2023-03-27

I passed the last one, which was almost four months before being retrieved in WOS.

&冬季 2023-03-27

Does anyone know: How long does it take for the articles of Guo Tao to be searchable after publication?

enrico 2023-03-24

2023.1.1 Submission
2023.1.5 Review sent
2023.2.20 Major revision Three reviewers were assigned, and the review process should have been completed within a month. The first reviewer suggested against publication due to lack of innovation, but the reasons provided were vague and difficult to understand, without specific recommendations. Personally, I feel that this reviewer may have intentionally caused trouble. The other two reviewers provided corresponding suggestions for modifications, mainly regarding image clarity, descriptions, and additional details.
2023.3.4 Major revision submitted
2023.3.5 Under review, invited 2+ reviewers, possibly including the negative reviewer
Subsequent changes in the RRC status three times
2023.3.20 RRC
2023.3.23 Complete accept
The overall duration took close to four months. Editor Pietro Vincenzini handled the process quickly, and the review efficiency was relatively high. Based on recent comments, there seemed to be a higher proportion of negative reviewers. However, I believe that the main editor was willing to send for review and there were fewer negative reviewers, also providing an opportunity for modifications. Overall, they took the issue seriously. Best wishes!

饭桶 2023-03-22

The chief editor responsible for me is Guo Tao. It only took a few days to submit the manuscript. He actively contacted the reviewers. One of them had no comments, while the other provided feedback stating that there was no innovation and refused to accept it. The editor asked me to handle the second reviewer and requested a major revision. With an anxious heart, I uploaded the revised version. The editor sent it back to the two reviewers. One of them completed the review in a week, while the other didn't provide any feedback for a month. I thought it was over, but unexpectedly, the editor directly accepted it. I submitted the manuscript in early November and it was accepted in early February. I am very grateful to the chief editor.

科研小驴车 2023-03-21

March 21st for review

科研小驴车 2023-03-20

Posted on March 15th, 23. One meeting with the editor on the 16th and 17th.

帕瓦罗蒂 2023-03-17

22.12.29submit - Submitted on December 29th
22.12.29with editor - Submitted with editor on December 29th
23.1.2 under review - Under review as of January 2nd
23.1.3under review - Under review as of January 3rd
23.1.9under review - Under review as of January 9th
23.2.2decision in process - Decision in process as of February 2nd
23.2.2 major revise - Major revision required as of February 2nd
23.3.1 submit - Submitted on March 1st
23.3.1 with editor - Submitted with editor on March 1st
23.3.2 under review - Under review as of March 2nd
23.3.10 required review completed - Required review completed on March 10th
23.3.15 rrc - Unknown abbreviation/term
23.3.16 decision in process - Decision in process as of March 16th
23.3.16 accept - Accepted on March 16th
五个审稿人，第一次一个消极，三个积极，一个没明确。- Five reviewers, one negative feedback in the first round, three positive feedback, one unclear.
第二次是全部同意。- In the second round, all agreed.