迷失自我的青椒 2021-04-25

Last month, I submitted an article. Initially, I didn't feel much pressure - just wanted to see if my research results were up to the standards of this journal. But something instantly made me lose my calm. It's only April, and the submission number for my article is over 13,000. If we go by the submission numbers of other journals, this means that the experts have already received over 13,000 submissions for this journal. I didn't expect the competition to be so fierce. However, there's no way to withdraw it now. It's been two weeks and I haven't heard anything. Based on the situation, I feel like my article has probably been rejected without a second thought. Heh.

哆啦6梦 2021-04-23

Submitted on January 5, 2021
Provided major revisions on February 8
Returned after major revisions on March 27
Provided minor revisions on April 18
Revised on April 19
Accepted on April 22

要努力科研呀 2021-04-20

4.19 has turned into "reviewer invited" it seems that there were conflicting opinions from the reviewers, so they have invited new reviewers again. Hopefully, good luck.

acel 2021-04-15

After revising, I submitted it for review again. It has been half a month since the review, but it is still showing "editor assigned". Could you please let me know how much longer it will take?

要努力科研呀 2021-04-12

Submitted on January 23rd, under review since February 8th, and the status date has not changed until now. Could it be that they can't find a reviewer? The waiting days are quite agonizing.

小洛洛 2021-04-02

The text in English is:

It was mentioned above that the proof is expected to be sent on 3.30. However, as of 4.2, it has not arrived yet. Does anyone have the same situation?

wuchao342626 2021-03-30

Returned for repair, now it's Under Review again... I guess we'll have to wait a long time.

猪头三四 2021-03-30

Around 10 to 14 days.

小洛洛 2021-03-30

After nine months of experiencing, it has not been published yet. The main reviewers are taking too long in the process. Does anyone know how long it takes to be published after acceptance???

猪头三四 2021-03-29

Did you win?

10+SCI 2021-03-26

Every time a reviewer agrees to review, the "under review" date is updated once. The number of times it changes reflects the number of reviewers who agree to review.

MG123 2021-03-26

Same question, the Under Review date has changed three times already.

chenxin-feng 2021-03-24

The rejection notice after five months is quite harsh. The editor is very good and responds quickly, but the review process took too long. It is recommended that those who are in a hurry to graduate should not submit...

wuchao342626 2021-03-14

Will you find new reviewers for this manuscript after three months of major revisions and just returning with Karl Stahr as the editor and two initial reviewers?

ws花朵 2021-02-24

May I ask which reviewer you have chosen? Can I ask you a question?

jane198685 2021-02-17

3 months for the initial draft, and if everything goes smoothly, it will be published in 6 months. If the main body of this journal is appropriate, it is relatively easy, but the language definitely needs to be polished.

Yiguo1028 2021-01-27

I personally think CATENA is still a good journal. Regarding the issue mentioned by the original poster, I have also encountered it in soil tillage research, with the editor-in-chief being B. Jansen.

名字真长长长长长长长长长长 2021-01-26

2020.09.07 submitted
2020.09.15 under review
2020.11.30 moderate revision
2020.12.23 submitted
2020.12.28 under review
2021.01.13 accept

Personally, I feel that this is relatively easy to be accepted in the first district, and the language requirements are not very high.
The impact factor has been rapidly increasing every year, and the instant IF broke five in 2021.
The speed is closely related to the editor. The several articles I have submitted were all processed quickly by the editor.

hy1983 2021-01-18

This editor is terrible, this journal is really badly managed.

青豌豆 2021-01-15

Actually, similar situations have also been encountered in other journals, such as AFM. It is a problem of individual editors requesting the deletion of the South China Sea region.

猪头三四 2021-01-10

Correction, in early January 2021, accepted. Unconsciously, it has already been ten days into 2021.

猪头三四 2021-01-10

Sharing the submission process, the speed of feeling entering the track is not too slow, but it can't be said to be fast for sure.
Submitted in May 2020, reviewed and sent for evaluation after about half a month.
Received feedback in September, two reviewers, one likely rejected the submission and the other suggested minor revisions. The editor decided to reject it but encouraged a resubmission.
Submitted a revised version in October, without any modification marks as required for resubmission. After the editor reviewed it, it was sent back for further modifications.
In November, the revised manuscript was submitted again and reviewed by two reviewers.
In December, modification suggestions were received during Christmas, suggesting minor revisions.
Rushed to submit the modified version before New Year's Day.
Experience of more than a week with an assigned editor.
Entered the "decision in process" stage directly after more than 10 days.
Accepted in early January 2020.

寂玄道隐士 2021-01-07

One of the authoritative journals in the field of soil water resources, the review comments are very strict.