RS飞行员 2023-01-27

09 Jan 2023, Submitted
12 Jan 2023, Editor assigned
18 Jan 2023, Reject

小白a 2023-01-25

2022.12.28 Submission
2022.12.29 Editor assigned
2023.1.10 Editor assigned
2023.1.16 Reviewers invited
Too slow, in a hurry to graduate, be cautious! It has been a month and it is still in the state of inviting reviewers. Hope the process can speed up a bit!
Good luck, good luck, good luck!

岩土0920 2023-01-23

2022.11.28 Minor Revision
2022.12.15 Revised
2023.1.18 Accepted

The review process is very slow.

胖子没有脚 2023-01-20

Submitted on November 25, 2022,
Rejected on January 19, 2023.
In the past two months, only one review from Australia: insufficient innovation.

奎阁高香 2023-01-17

I recently submitted an article, and the editor requested me to revise it before resubmission. Currently, the journal's submission pool is very good, with an acceptance rate of 20%. It may become more difficult to get published in a few years. However, I have a positive long-term outlook. If anyone has suitable submission outlets, it's worth giving it a try and not losing out. ^_^

Wuwei 2023-01-12

The content of the article is well done. After undergoing a major revision, this magazine is still good.

_xingyunL 2022-12-18

The processing speed of the editorial department is relatively fast, it takes a little over 3 months from submission to acceptance. I will share the timeline for reference.

September 6, 2022: Submitted to the editor
September 8, 2022: Editor assigned
September 12, 2022: Reviews invited
September 15, 2022: Under review
September 20, 2022: Under review
October 15, 2022: Required reviews completed
October 16, 2022: Major revision
November 4, 2022: Revision submitted
November 24, 2022: Minor revision
December 4, 2022: Revision submitted
December 5, 2022: Editor assigned
December 17, 2022: Accepted

For the first review, there were 3 reviewers. For the second review, an additional reviewer was invited. In total, there were 4 reviewers for major and minor revisions.

大魔王1747 2022-12-11

Trashy journal, it's incredibly slow. It took over a month just to review, and it's been three months and they still haven't finished reviewing my manuscript. Other journals that my peers submitted to after me have already been published, but mine still hasn't finished the review process!

艾森伯格 2022-11-25

11/25 Submitted to journal
11/26 Editor assigned
12/3 Rejected

Thank you

动物园大佬板 2022-11-15

Hello, may I ask if the "reviewer(s) invited" status means that new reviewers have been found, or if the reviewers from the first review will continue reviewing? It has been almost a month since I submitted my second review, and the status has changed from "under review" to "reviewer(s) invited".

书香气质丹小马 2022-11-02

It has been 25 days for me.

zhangjunjiayou 2022-11-01

It has been 12 days since the assignment was given to editor, but there has been no response. Has anyone else encountered this situation?

天津大麻花 2022-10-31

The main problem is that I have many issues, usually two.

阿hao1 2022-10-28

Wow, 6 reviewers, I suggest you withdraw directly.

天津大麻花 2022-10-07

It took nearly 13 months, with most of the time spent on inviting reviewers. In the first review, there were 2 reviewers, and a total of 4 + 24 + 53 questions from the editor, reviewer 1, and reviewer 2, respectively, with 58 pages of revision instructions. In the second review, there were 6 reviewers. Reviewer 1 agreed to accept, while reviewer 2 agreed to review but did not provide timely feedback. Reviewer 3 accepted after minor revisions, while reviewer 4 rejected the paper without providing a reason, simply stating that the article must be rejected. Reviewer 5 accepted after minor revisions, and reviewer 6 accepted after minor revisions. In the third review, there were 2 reviewers, and both reviewer 5 and reviewer 6 agreed to accept.

天津大麻花 2022-10-07

It took nearly 13 months, with most of the time spent on inviting reviewers. In the first round, there were 2 reviewers, with a total of 4+24+53 questions from the editor, reviewer 1, and reviewer 2. The revision notes were 58 pages long. In the second round, there were 6 reviewers. Reviewer 1 agreed to accept, reviewer 2 agreed to review but did not provide timely feedback, reviewer 3 accepted after minor revisions, reviewer 4 rejected the submission without providing any reasons other than a single sentence stating that the article must be rejected. Reviewer 5 accepted after minor revisions, and reviewer 6 accepted after minor revisions as well. In the third round, there were 2 reviewers, and both reviewer 5 and 6 agreed to accept. This is just a reference for everyone's submission experience.

天津大麻花 2022-10-07

2021.9.16 submitted
2021.9.18 editor assigned
2021.10.18 under review
2022.1.10 under review
2022.1.23 Major revision
2022.2.19 revised
2022.2.25 under review
2022.3.7 under review
2022.4.10 under review
2022.7.10 under review
2022.9.1 under review
2022.9.5 under review
2022.9.10 moderate revision
2022.9.12 revised
2022.9.17 under review
2022.9.20 under review
2022.10.6 accept

Translated:
2021.9.16 submitted
2021.9.18 editor assigned
2021.10.18 under review
2022.1.10 under review
2022.1.23 Major revision
2022.2.19 revised
2022.2.25 under review
2022.3.7 under review
2022.4.10 under review
2022.7.10 under review
2022.9.1 under review
2022.9.5 under review
2022.9.10 moderate revision
2022.9.12 revised
2022.9.17 under review
2022.9.20 under review
2022.10.6 accept

fang0829 2022-10-05

7.14 submitted to the journal
7.19 under review
7.25 reviews invited
8.6 reviews invited
8.7 under review
8.19 under review
8.23 under review
9.2 Required Reviews Completed
9.2 Major revision
9.24 Revision submitted
10.1 accept
There are a total of 2 reviewers. One reviewer provided major revisions and raised many questions, while the other reviewer provided minor revision suggestions. After returning, it was sent back to a first reviewer who suggested acceptance. The review process was quite fast. The editor-in-chief is Cezary Kabala.

天津大麻花 2022-10-05

Patience, just wait a little longer.

贝颖 2022-10-05

Has the editing department been on vacation recently? It's been ten days and there's still no news about the decision.

赵江涛 2022-09-27

2022.09.27Submitted to Journal

Translation: Submitted to Journal on September 27th, 2022.

岩土0920 2022-09-21

2022.9.21 - Review invitations sent: 2+

文章发发发 2022-09-21

Can I add your contact information?

文章发发发 2022-09-21

Can I add your contact information?

文章发发发 2022-09-21

Why can't we display a map of China?

岩土0920 2022-09-20

2022.3.31 Submission
2022.5.21 Major renovation
2022.6.13 Major renovation revision
2022.7.16 Major renovation under review, awaiting expert's opinion

大魔王1747 2022-09-13

Excuse me, has your submission been reviewed now?

大魔王1747 2022-09-13

Why is yours so fast? It has been a month for me and I am still assigned as an editor. This is really too slow.

gyh 2022-09-08

Posted on November 17, 2021, major revisions are expected around April 2022. It took four days to complete the revisions, and then we had to wait again for minor revisions around June. It took an additional month for another reviewer to provide feedback for the minor revisions, which were completed on the same day. Finally, the paper was accepted on September 4, 2022. It's safe to say it was a very slow process, taking almost a year.

小李子000 2022-09-06

Self-written, not machine-translated.