lee 2021-08-29

How do I contact the editor? Where do I email the editor? I also want to try submitting a summary for Bite, but I don't know where to submit my extended abstract and outline.

lee 2021-08-29

May I ask, if BITE is not accompanied by references, what is the maximum acceptable rate of repetition?

计划SCI破10 2021-08-20

will not directly refuse

XC1119796177 2021-08-19

7.10 sub - Submitted on October 7th
7.11 with editor - With editor on October 11th
7.13 under review - Under review on July 13th
7.20 under review - Under review on July 20th
8.10 major - Major revision on August 10th
8.16 resub - Resubmitted on August 16th
8.17 8:00 PM minor - Minor revision on August 17th at 8:00 PM
8.17 9:00 PM re-resub - Re-resubmitted on August 17th at 9:00 PM
8.17 11:00 PM accept - Accepted on August 17th at 11:00 PM
The French editor is processing it quickly, amazing!
Also, from what I saw in the comments, it seems that there is no second review in BT, which means that once the first review is done, as long as it's not rejected, if you make good revisions and show the editor your attitude, you'll be accepted within three days after major revisions, sign the copyright on the same day, and publish online within five days. Honestly, this speed is truly impressive.

haobt 2021-08-16

I would like to ask, when submitting, it is mentioned to submit research data. Does this data include all the experimental and analytical test data? Also, is it necessary to submit? Will there be any consequences if not submitted?

计划SCI破10 2021-07-21

When I submitted it, I already thought that if I won, I would definitely come and share it.
6.10 submitted to journal
6.14 under review
7.3 minor revision
7.10 resubmission
7.13 accept
7.17 online
The editing efficiency is very high, thanks to Editor-in-Chief Huu Hao Ngo.

早点毕业嘿哈嘿哈 2021-07-20

0615 Submission
0703 Major revision
0718 Rework
0719 Acceptance
The review efficiency is very high, thank you Prof. Christian Larroche!
Wishing everyone a smooth submission process!

zoey2021 2021-07-18

The review process is fast, and the editors are very diligent and responsible.

小damn 2021-07-17

Normal, it should be arbitrated.

sisrsheng 2021-07-16

Journal editors are diligent and responsible, with a nice speed of reviewing and efficient handling. We hope that the journal will continue to improve.

P.H. 2021-07-13

Is my status "re-revision" because you were not satisfied with the results of my first major revision, or is it just for minor formatting changes this time?

Elsevier 2021-07-13

Dear Dr. Ngo

花园街大白菜 2021-07-05

5.14 Submission
5.16 Under review
6.4 Major revision
6.18 Submitted to journal
6.19 Accepted
BT is really efficient. They even took a break for the Dragon Boat Festival in between. It took about a month to complete. Keep up the good work!

P.H. 2021-07-05

I also encountered Dr. HUU HAO NGO, and I would like to write him a letter requesting to postpone the repair time. How should I address him in the beginning? Dear Dr. HUU HAO NGO.

REPEST 2021-07-03

Is it normal to change from "required reviews completed" to "under review"?

小damn 2021-06-08

Share the recently recorded articles. The efficiency of the editors and reviewers is very high. Wishing the journal to continue to improve!
Apr 27, 2021
Submitted to Journal;
Apr 28, 2021
With Editor;
Apr 29, 2021
Revision Submitted to Journal;
May 03, 2021
With Editor;
May 03, 2021
Under Review;
May 24, 2021
Required Reviews Completed;
May 24, 2021
Major Revise;
Jun 01, 2021
Revision Submitted to Journal;
Jun 02, 2021
With Editor;
Jun 03, 2021
Accepted.

Ting 2021-05-06

First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Editor Christian Larroche. He handled the manuscript efficiently and responsibly, giving me great encouragement as a first-time submitter.

Submitted to journal on March 10, 2021.
With editor on March 10, 2021.
Major revision on April 3, 2021.
Submitted to journal on April 18, 2021.
Revision on April 19, 2021.
Submitted to journal on April 23, 2021.
Accepted on April 24, 2021.

BT is renowned for its efficiency, as well as its meticulousness. The proofreading in the later stages was handled very responsibly. In short, thank you very much!

加油加油加油 2021-04-01

2021.1.31 submitted to the journal
2021.2.1 with editor
2021.2.4 resubmitted after addressing formatting repetition issue
2021.2.20 submitted to the journal
2021.2.21 with editor
2021.2.21 under review
2021.3.11 required reviews completed
2021.3.13 major revision
2021.3.25 revision submitted to the journal
2021.3.26 with editor
2021.3.28 minor issues revised again
2021.3.28 revision submitted to the journal
2021.3.29 with editor
2021.4.1 accepted. It feels increasingly difficult to get articles accepted in top-tier journals like the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Some say BITE receives more submissions from Chinese researchers. Are there any journals in China that receive fewer submissions now? Articles lacking innovation are quickly rejected.
BITE's reputation is growing. Hopefully, the impact factor of BT will also increase.
Sincere thanks to the editor-in-chief!

化学小生 2021-03-22

On January 14, 2121, the article was rejected due to a high similarity rate and was requested to resubmit after reducing the similarity rate. On January 14, 2021, the revised article was submitted. On March 5, the reviewer's comments were received and the attitude of the reviewers was very good. On March 19, the reviewer's comments were returned by the editor-in-chief, HUU HAO NGO, who was very efficient, and some formatting issues were quickly addressed within a few hours. On March 22, the article was accepted directly. Thank you to Editor-in-Chief HUU HAO NGO.

sci_accepted 2021-02-15

The efficiency of the editorial department is very high. With three reviewers, the manuscript was accepted within two days after major revisions were submitted. Thank you, BT.

2哈哈231 2021-02-06

According to information known in 2020, submission does not require confirmation from all authors. Only confirmation on the submission system is needed.

aalbxy 2021-01-27

Do you need to confirm everything?

jiejie 2021-01-23

Previously, I mentioned that if I have the chance to get published in BT, I will share my feelings and experiences.

2020.12.10: Submitted to the journal
2020.12.11: Under review by the editor
2020.12.12: Under review
2020.12.28: Required reviews completed
2020.12.29: Major revision (1 associate editor and 3 reviewers)
2021.1.20: Revision submitted to the journal
2021.1.21: Under review by the editor
2021.1.23: Accepted

Here are a few thoughts:
1. The impact factor of BT is increasing, and it feels like the difficulty of getting accepted is also increasing. If the innovation is not good enough, the paper is directly rejected, which is quite harsh.
2. The reviewers are very meticulous, and they provide numerous comments, making it challenging to make the revisions. There were seventy to eighty suggestions for modifications (although many were related to minor details).
3. The response to the reviewers' comments was already four to five pages long, which is twice the length of the article itself.
4. It seems like the editors even work on weekends to process the manuscripts. The status of the paper changes every day.
5. Innovation and potential practicality are highly valued.
6. I hope the impact factor of BT in 2021 can exceed 9.

Sincere thanks to the editor!

叶鹏林 2021-01-20

It has been a while, do we need the consent of all authors via email to submit to the journal?

叶鹏林 2021-01-14

Just invested in BT, looking for graduation.

科研G 2021-01-13

November 29, 2020, Submitted to Journal
November 30, 2020, With Editor (Editor handled it quickly)
December 3, 2020, Under Review (Peer review invitation was prompt)
December 16, 2020, Major Revise (Results from external provinces came quickly, two peers, along with Editor Huu Hao Ngo's comments, provided constructive suggestions, no need for additional experiments, provided 20 days for revisions)
January 4, 2020, Resubmitted for Revision
January 6, 2020, Revised again (three small formatting issues)
January 8, 2020, Resubmitted again
January 12, Accepted.
Overall experience sharing: (1) Manuscript formatting: Figures and tables should be placed at the end of the text, one figure per page, instead of mixed with text; References need to be numbered, otherwise, revisions will require you to add them, the submission guidelines are very detailed about these.
(2) Article writing: Emphasize key points and innovations.
(3) Responding to reviewers: Be polite and use a question-and-answer format. It seems that my response to the reviewers was not seen because within 2-3 days of revision, I received further revision comments (probably no request for additional experiments), but it is important to take it seriously.
Finally, I would like to thank B.T for the encouragement and hope that anyone reading this message will succeed.

kust1 2021-01-13

Around two weeks, if there is no reply, you can send an email to inquire again.

Harding 2021-01-10

Can you please send me a copy of the submission format for this magazine? I couldn't find it. Thank you so much. My email address is 925560051@qq.com.

科研孩子 2021-01-09

Review submission, need experts (your review content, which is frequently studied by you, with a considerable number of SCI articles and international influence).
Once you meet the expert level and are recognized by the editor-in-chief (or associate editor), and if your review content is relatively novel, you can generally expect a response within 5 days.

科研孩子 2021-01-09

Replying to editing directly: Dear Huu Hao Ngo, perhaps in Chinese culture, it is believed that addressing someone by their name directly is not appropriate. However, this is not the case for foreigners. There is no need to include a title. Foreigners tend to be more straightforward.