strawberry47 2022-08-23

Submitted in January, results came out in April, all three reviewers gave major revisions.
Resubmitted in June after major revisions, received second round of reviewer comments in August, two accepted with minor revisions.
Currently, minor revisions have been completed, unsure of how long until the results are released.

bigbigpang 2022-08-23

The status has changed to "With Editor", hoping for a good result!!!

bigbigpang 2022-08-22

The status is updated to "With Editor", which means the editor is currently making a decision.

bigbigpang 2022-08-10

On May 29th, the manuscript is still under review. I asked the editor and they said there are still some revision comments that haven't been returned. So slow!

limengran 2022-08-03

6.13 Submission
7.25 Reject and Resubmit as "New"
All three reviewers recommended major revisions, but they were quite quick. I am preparing to make the necessary changes and submit again, hoping for good luck...

bigbigpang 2022-07-24

Just wait a little longer, wait another month.

乔纳森 2022-07-22

This journal, just like this, is undergoing external review. You can try to urge the manuscript submission. Some AEs are slower.

bigbigpang 2022-07-19

It's already February, should I remind you to submit the manuscript?

bigbigpang 2022-07-11

How long did your Undergoing review last?

zhaoshichuan 2022-07-11

It has been two and a half months and still in review...

bigbigpang 2022-07-11

Posted on May 29th, it is still undergoing review. It's normal.

bigbigpang 2022-07-05

Just finished voting not long ago, leaving it to fate, it's really tough.

jb2849 2022-07-05

By the way, the method I use is purely mathematical and has nothing to do with deep learning or machine learning.

jb2849 2022-07-05

By the way, just a question, only the newly added reviewer said that my method is simple. The third reviewer I encountered is definitely new, as what he said is inconsistent with his previous questions.

jb2849 2022-07-05

I'll share my experience of rejection. To be honest, I have had numerous articles rejected myself and it happens quite often. But the peer review in this case was beyond belief, and I truly have no words. Suddenly, I understand what others have said, that journal editors reject based on their own preferences.

I first submitted in December of the 21st year, and after two and a half months, I received the first review. The review included detailed comments from each reviewer, with two major revisions and one minor revision. The main feedback was that the data was insufficient. The Associate Editor (AE) gave a "reject and resubmit" decision, asking me to supplement the data. So, I added new data in April, which was more than twice the amount of the previous data.

In early April, I submitted the revised article for the second review, and received the feedback on July 4th. It included one major revision, one minor revision, and an acceptance. However, the AE rejected it, stating a lack of novelty. The AE said that all the reviewers pointed out that my method was too simple and lacked complexity, leaning more towards engineering.

Firstly, the idea I proposed was the first of its kind in the field. Secondly, the method itself focuses on information fusion analysis. As a data mining article, it naturally includes a significant amount of analysis, including engineering-oriented analysis. This can be seen in many articles published in TKDD and TKDE.

Furthermore, I compared my method with eight other methods from recent years (2019-2021) which were published in journals like TPAMI and DMKD. My method yielded the best results. Isn't it a contribution to have a simple and effective approach?

bigbigpang 2022-06-30

It has been a month since the submission, and it is still undergoing review.

乔纳森 2022-06-19

Why do you say that, senior brother? Can you explain in detail? I see everyone saying that this journal is too difficult and the reviewer's comments are very straightforward, but no one mentions the chaos of giants.

jb2849 2022-06-15

Last December was my first submission. It took about two months for the reviews, with two major revisions and one minor revision. Eventually, it was rejected and I had to resubmit. It took me a month to conduct additional experiments and submit it again. However, two and a half months have passed and there is still no news. I've recently become quite hopeless about submitting. I just wanted to come here and vent a bit. The submission volume at IEEE is truly overwhelming.

fuzzysets 2022-06-13

The poorly-rated journals in IEEE Transactions are rejecting articles based on personal preferences of the chief editor. It is estimated that there will be a need for a change in the chief editor in order to see any development.

Jasmine的H君 2022-04-21

The translation of "undergoing reviewer" into English is "being reviewed."

citystory 2022-04-07

[Review Quality]: Three reviewers, who were quite serious in their review. Their opinions were relatively fair, with two minor revisions and one acceptance. Eventually, there were only minor revisions required.

[Review Speed]: The speed was extremely fast. The first review was received within three months, which was unexpected. The second review took only one month. The subsequent tasks, such as preparing the camera-ready version, took approximately one more month.

kashiwawawa 2022-04-01

Yes, it is already being reviewed. The next update will be the decision.

MS.Robert 2022-03-28

Hello, I would like to ask, does the status "Undergoing review" mean that it has already entered the peer review process? It has been in this state all along, will the status change if it enters the review process?

kashiwawawa 2022-03-27

I'm sorry, but I am unable to directly translate a webpage. However, I can provide you with a general description of the webpage you provided.

The link you shared directs to the IEEE Xplore Digital Library, specifically to a page displaying the recent issue of a publication. The publication is associated with the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) and has a unique number identified as "6687317." The content of the page is likely to be related to research articles, papers, or other scientific content within the field of electrical engineering and computer science. To access the specific content and understand its details, you may need to visit the page and use the available features and options provided by the IEEE Xplore Digital Library.

jjyifan 2022-03-26

May I ask where the submission website is located?

kashiwawawa 2022-03-21

"The submission experience was great, considering submitting again next time.
[Reviewer's comments] Although the article received a lot of feedback from five reviewers, personally I think the comments given were very fair and professional. After making the revisions according to the reviewers' suggestions, the article indeed improved significantly.
[Review speed] After three months of submission, a major revision was requested, and after making the modifications, a minor revision was requested within about a month. The article was accepted after the third submission."

Timotte 2022-03-21

Yes, undergoing review for 9 months.

NookLook 2022-03-20

May I ask if "审了9个月" refers to being in the "Undergoing review" status for 9 months?

Timotte 2022-02-17

Not recommended to submit to this journal, recently they have been accepting papers from Tsinghua University (Tsinghua's backyard?).

乔纳森 2022-02-16

Why is it like this? Damn it. I have two minors and one major. The editor gave me the major. Leave a contact information for further communication.