认证评论 - ACS Applied Nano Materials
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

快让我毕业吧 2022-07-31

Should not send it. I did not receive it.

Kkkkkkkkk77 2022-07-29

Translated text:
Submitted AC on June 28th.
On June 30th evening, AC requested to transfer the submission to ACS ANM and I agreed.
Peer review on July 2nd.
Major revision on July 20th with five reviewers - three major revisions, one minor revision, and one rejection.
Uploaded revised manuscript on the evening of July 28th.
Morning of July 29th, the editor asked me to make some formatting changes before the second review.
Submitted two revised manuscripts on July 29th afternoon.

The process is quite fast, but I'm afraid the second review might reject my submission...

zzz15 2022-07-29

Will the peer review send emails notice now?

快让我毕业吧 2022-07-22

ACS ami conversion投
Submitted on 6.18
Major revision on 7.1, with a total of over twenty questions from three reviewers and the editor
Submitted R1 on 7.19
Minor revision on 7.20, editor raised a formatting issue and received R2 on the same day

过半 2022-07-08

ACS sensor conversion
5.7 submit to journal
5.10 with editor
5.11 under review
5.24 major revision
6.8 with editor
6.22 accepted

The new journal is very efficient, usually having five reviewers. Special thanks to Editor Zhao Yanli for her meticulous and efficient work, pointing out many formatting issues.

amoszhou 2022-06-28

The following text translates to English as: "The AMI was turned over and within less than a month of review, two out of four reviewers rejected it, one being a senior reviewer and the other a junior reviewer. Although it was rejected, the reviewers pointed out a crucial issue."

钓叟 2022-06-15

Teacher Feng has exploded, but is it still okay?

以利沙 2022-04-27

Instant Impact Factor 6.064, hoping to break 6 when the impact factor is released this year. A very good journal, worth submitting to.

冯老师炸了 2022-04-13

The speed is impressive, but it got rejected. There were three reviewers, two approved with revisions, and one rejected. The reasons for the rejection were quite baffling.

小渔 2022-03-21

2021.8.12 submitted
2021.9.7 major revision, the associate editor is from India and works on MOF. There are four additional reviewers, two major revisions and two minor revisions. Response to comments is over 20 pages.
2021.9.26 revised and resubmitted
2021.9.29 minor revision
2021.9.30 revised and resubmitted
2021.10.01 accepted

西交学者 2022-02-23

Material Zone 3, relatively easy to get accepted. In 2021, three reviewers: one accepts directly, two require minor revisions. From submission to acceptance, it takes less than three months. If you need to quickly graduate, you can consider submitting an article.

GUET何时转HIT 2022-02-15

Hello, may I ask if you can share the submission website for ACS Applied Nano Materials journal? Thank you.

GUET何时转HIT 2022-02-15

Hello, may I ask if you can share the submission website for ACS Applied Nano Materials journal? Thank you.

GUET何时转HIT 2022-02-15

Hello, may I ask if you can share the submission website of the ACS Applied Nano Materials journal? Thank you.

Jelly Chen 2021-12-20

11.4 submit
12.2 major revision submitted a 14-page paper with mostly non-technical issues. One reviewer rejected without reason, two suggested minor revisions, and one suggested major revisions. The major revisions were made and the editor requested another round of external review.
12.11 sent back for revisions
12.16 accepted

追光者 2021-12-18

Received the acceptance notice on the same day.

叶扁舟 2021-12-15

May I ask how long it takes to receive the email after accepting it?

叶扁舟 2021-12-15

After submitting, I received the reviewer's comments after a month. I made major revisions and resubmitted it after almost a month of modifications. After more than a month, there were some minor issues pointed out by another reviewer. After about 10 days of revisions and response, I submitted it again. It took approximately a week for it to show as accepted.

追光者 2021-12-03

2021.10.18 Submitted
2021.11.12 major revision
2021.11.24 Revised and resubmitted
2021.11.25 minor revision
2021.11.30 Revised and resubmitted
2021.12.01 Accepted

大漂亮臭宝子 2021-11-30

Could you please tell me if you encountered "File will not display in proof" when revising, which ultimately resulted in the PDF version of the main manuscript being invisible? How should it be handled? Also, how can one prove themselves as the first author rather than a co-author?

肉八斤 2021-11-24

The journal editor is quite fast in handling submissions. I transferred the manuscript from ACS ami journal. It was submitted on October 4th and received revisions on November 5th. There were four reviewers, three minor and one major. No additional experiments were required, but some questions from the reviewers needed to be addressed. The revised version was submitted on November 18th (14 pages of response were provided). On November 20th, the editor found the overall response satisfactory, but there were four responses that needed to be integrated into the manuscript. The final revision was submitted around 10 pm on November 23rd, and the acceptance email was received on the morning of November 24th. The journal editor is very responsible and efficient.

蚂蚁 2021-11-04

20210912-Submitted, 20210914-Associate Editor Assigned, the review status will remain Under review, 20211008-Major revisions (four reviewers, plus the editor, with approximately 40 questions, given 20 days for revisions, the response had more comments than the article's word count), 20211028-Response, 20211102-The editor still has some formatting and TOC issues (given one week for modifications), 20211103 Response, 20211104-Accepted.

shawnsz 2021-11-03

Transfer ACS AMI, because I was in a hurry to graduate and didn't want to bother anymore. I transferred on 20210806, rejected and resubmitted on 20210831. There were four reviewers, three accepted, one rejected, and the reasons for rejection were all weak and unfounded. I wrote a response and resubmitted on 20211013, and it was accepted on 20211022.

Lang Hu 2021-10-24

Already invested for 22 days and still under review, it seems like the efficient AAA of ACS is not as legendary as it is said to be.

a22_82 2021-10-21

Thank you, host! Very important tip!

forwardwang 2021-10-21

AMI suggested switching to ANM. In peer review, emails are not sent and can be viewed on the ACS publish center.

lkjc;vlkpcj 2021-09-11

The submission to acceptance process takes a total of 6 weeks, and the editing efficiency is quite high.

小Q 2021-09-03

Do any friends know if after assigning the associate editor, an email will be sent in peer review as well? If no email is sent, does it mean it has not been submitted for review?

xc6511 2021-08-31

Review takes 7 days, receive within one month.

2021-08-21

Did I offend you guys? Do I have anything to do with you? Have you ever encountered unscrupulous reviewers and made unfounded comments? I have made many comments and this is the first time I scolded a reviewer, and I even directly wrote a letter to the editor. The editor also thinks the review is flawed? Just because I posted an applied polymer, you react like this. Study well, kid. Don't assume that reviewers are your fathers and know everything.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now