认证评论 - Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

jiejing 2021-06-15

The text says, "The article mentioned 'your paper your way,' take a careful look at the submission guidelines. The review process is quick, wishing you good luck."

jiejing 2021-06-15

Record the first article:
Apr 21, 2021 with editor
Apr 24, 2021 Under Review
May 05, 2021 Required Reviews Completed
May 16, 2021 Major Revision
May 19, 2021 Under Review
May 26, 2021 Required Reviews Completed
Jun 13, 2021 Accept

杜Nature 2021-06-13

May I ask how long after receiving it will you be online?

islnana 2021-06-12

First submission of the manuscript and couldn't find a template. May I ask if you have a template for manuscript submission? Or should I just follow my own format as long as it looks presentable?

islnana 2021-06-12

Hello, first time submitting, does this magazine have a template? Can I directly upload the manuscript?

Ashessssy 2021-05-25

Can you share the format template of this journal? The official website's Guide for Authors section is not loading.

LMY10 2021-05-25

Sorry, I chose the wrong submission cycle. I thought it was the time from submission to the first return for repairs.

LMY10 2021-05-24

2.24 Submission
3.5 Editing distribution
3.17 Major revision
4.9 Return of manuscript
4.21 Minor revision
5.19 Return of manuscript
5.24 Acceptance

yxiang 2021-05-22

5.16 required reviews completed
5.22 accept

Originally, I thought that it would take a long time after the second review and I felt that the chances of success were slim. I was hoping for the best outcome, which would have been minor revisions, but instead it was accepted directly! This article is my first SCI paper, and it had been rejected five times before for various reasons. It went from being submitted to a top-tier journal to a lower-tier journal, and it had never been sent for review. I tried to submit it to JECE (Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering), and unexpectedly, it was quickly sent for review. The comments from the first reviewer were also very insightful and of high quality. After making the necessary revisions, it was accepted. I am very grateful to Prof. Wen Zhang from the New Jersey Institute of Technology! I wish everyone a lot of success with their articles!

YGX 2021-05-13

This magazine is really amazing. The review process was indeed fast, but they actually found 8 reviewers and gave 60 review comments. To be honest, I was completely stunned when I saw these review comments. I had previously submitted to Applied Catalysis B, CEJ, and Green Chemistry, but because I didn't seize the opportunity, the quality and data of the manuscripts were not solid enough, and the results I received were all rejections. Then I spent a month modifying the manuscript according to the reviewers' comments from these three journals, and after the modifications were complete, I submitted to other journals. But here comes the key point, after these three journals, every submission I made was rejected. I discussed it with my advisor, and he said it was really damaging to my reputation. He suggested either completely reorganizing the ideas and rewriting the manuscript, or just throwing it out. So, I decided to randomly select a journal with a decent impact factor to submit to, and I chose this one. Surprisingly, I received review comments in less than a month, and there were 8 reviewers who provided 60 review comments. They gave me four months to make revisions... I don't know how this journal will develop in the future, but when I saw the review comments, I felt completely obedient.

YGX 2021-05-13

This magazine is really amazing. The review process was indeed very fast, but they actually found eight reviewers and gave 60 review comments. To be honest, when I saw these review comments, I was completely confused. Before this, I submitted my work to Applied Catalysis B, CEJ, and Green Chemistry, but because I didn't grasp the opportunity well, the quality of the manuscript and data were not solid, and I received rejection letters from all of them. Then, based on the opinions of these three reviewers, I spent a month making revisions. After completing the revisions, I submitted to other journals. However, here comes the key point - after these three journals, I got rejected no matter where I submitted. I discussed with my supervisor, and he said that this was detrimental to my reputation. He suggested either completely overturning and reorganizing the ideas for this paper, or just throwing it away. So, I decided to randomly choose a journal and submitted it. I thought the impact factor of this journal was decent, so I submitted to it. Surprisingly, in less than a month, I received review comments from eight reviewers, with a four-month revision period. I... I don't know how this journal will develop in the future, but when I saw the review comments, I just felt completely obedient.

bin yu 2021-04-30

The speed was very fast, it was accepted in 27 days. During this period, it took two weeks for major revisions and a second review was sent to a reviewer, and it was accepted directly. The editor also accepted it directly.

yxiang 2021-04-27

3.9 submitted
3.10 with editor
3.10 under review
4.9 major revision
4.27 unknown result of rework (share experience and accumulate luck)

SmallN 2021-04-18

Total time spent: 4 months
Submitted on Jan 06, 2021
Accepted on Apr 17, 2021
During the first revision, there were two reviewers, one major revision and one rejection. The reviewer who gave the major revision provided very insightful comments, while the reviewer who rejected it had no understanding of the field (they raised some unnecessary questions). In the end, the editor requested a major revision.
After the second revision, two more reviewers were sought, one minor revision and one acceptance. The problems were not difficult, just some language polishing was needed.
The second day after the second revision, it was accepted.

大雷@heu 2021-04-09

The text translates to: "Two rounds of revisions were submitted. The first round had two reviewers and required major revisions. The second round had one reviewer and required minor revisions."

SmallN 2021-04-01

Required Reviews Completed for a week.

qf123 2021-03-26

Same question to the original poster, how long after completing the required review did you receive the review comments?

记录投稿经历 2021-03-24

It is January 27, 2021, with the editor.

记录投稿经历 2021-03-24

Already hired, complete record.
Submitted on January 23, 2021.
With editor on February 3, under review the same day. The editor, Teik Thye (T.T.) Lim, is from Singapore and is a fellow researcher in the field.
Required reviews completed on February 2, 2021.
Under review on February 3, submitted for a second round of review.
Major revision on February 18, lasted for a month with 5 reviewers, resulting in 3 minor revisions, 1 major revision, and 1 rejection. It should be noted that in the first round, there was 1 major revision, 1 minor revision, and 1 rejection, while in the second round, there were 2 minor revisions.
Submitted on March 18, 2021. The response was 9800 words long. I am quite talkative...
With editor on March 20, 2021.
Under review on March 20, 2021.
Under review on March 21, 2021.
Under review on March 23, 2021.
Required reviews completed on March 23, 2021.
Accepted on March 24.
The entire process took 2 months, with the main delay being due to my response time of 28 days. If compressed, the journal's process was actually quite fast.

Vincent H. 2021-03-22

Second submission, this time went more smoothly. I am very thankful to the editor-in-chief and the three reviewers for their professional questions. It took a month for major revisions and another month for modifications. I hope everything goes well from now on, and I hope that JECE's impact factor increases and the journal develops even better. Keep up the good work, and thank you very much for the editor-in-chief's submission.

qf123 2021-03-15

March 12th submission
March 14th with editor
March 14th under review
Continued updates to follow
Hoping for a good outcome

那又怎样 2021-03-06

Received on January 11, 2021,
Revised on February 18, 2021,
Accepted on February 27, 2021,
Available online on March 3, 2021.

The speed was super fast, and the editor G. Palmisano was very helpful. There were a total of five reviewers who provided more than 70 comments. We replied to each comment one by one, and after they were reviewed, the paper was basically accepted. However, it had to go through another round of review, possibly due to major revisions.

It took half a year to submit this first SCI paper, starting from a journal in the fourth quartile and making several revisions until it was accepted by a journal in the second quartile. It was a difficult journey.

Currently, this journal is in the second quartile, and we hope to maintain this status next year.

奔驰的小野马xxx 2021-03-02

What should we do, minor repair or major repair, boss?

记录投稿经历 2021-03-02

Reply to the modification suggestions on February 18th, there are opinions from 5 reviewers (should be 6, there is no opinion from the 5th reviewer). Currently in progress.

奔驰的小野马xxx 2021-03-01

Hello, OP. The required reviews have been completed and are currently under review. What is the estimated timeframe for the next update?

Water 2021-02-13

Posted on 2020.11.18; Received major revisions after about 3 weeks, the reviewers' comments were all good and insightful;
Submitted revised manuscript on 2021.01.08, received second round of review on 01.11;
Accepted on 2021.02.11.
It's quite efficient and a promising journal. Keep up the good work, hoping it can help everyone.

蛋仔牛奶 2021-02-04

The journal efficiency is super fast, the editors are very good and responsible, and the reviewers' opinions are also very professional. I hope it will continue to improve!

记录投稿经历 2021-02-04

2021.1.23 submit
2021.1.27 with editor, under review on the same day
2021.2.2 required reviews completed
2021.2.3 under review
To be continued. It feels more bad than good... It seems like the feedback was not good, but the editor considered it important and gave another round of review...?

向日葵xiangrikui 2021-01-27

This journal should now be in the second zone.

向日葵xiangrikui 2021-01-26

Isn't this journal in Zone 2 now?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More