学术小菜鸡！ 2023-07-20

25 May 2023 - Submitted to journal
28 May 2023 - With editor
30 May 2023 - Under review
29 June 2023 - Major revision
11 July 2023 - With editor
13 July 2023 - Minor revision
15 July 2023 - With editor
18 July 2023 - Article accepted for publication

灰灰 2023-07-20

What's the status now? You're progressing so fast!

迷路的科研小菜鸡 2023-07-19

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS has been transferred to Materials Today Communications. The manuscript was submitted in November last year and entered the "under review" stage for two weeks. After that, it went through a five-month-long "under review" process due to the editor sending it to two reviewers. One of the reviewers accepted the invitation and provided feedback quickly, but the second reviewer did not accept the invitation, causing further delay. After minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted directly.

Ran极 2023-07-19

May I ask how many reviewers you have for the review? ?? You are so fast!

iiiiii 2023-07-19

I submitted my application around June 15th, just like you did. Then, the next day, they also mentioned that there was missing information for the recommended reviewer. I completed the supplementation on June 17th and submitted it again. Finally, it was sent for review on July 15th.

phd RS 2023-07-19

It's been about ten days for me too, have you received any news?

Cola-Guan 2023-07-17

My No. 6 has been with the editor since the beginning until now, and the status has not changed. What's going on? Has anyone experienced something similar?

灰灰 2023-07-17

7.14 has changed the under once again, seeking collection.

Zhuiguang 2023-07-16

May I ask what is the current situation? I have been in this state without any changes, is it the rhythm of rejection?

Zhuiguang 2023-07-16

Why have I been "with editor" all along? It has been over two weeks and it still hasn't been reviewed. Does this mean it will be rejected?

边小城不爱吃香菜 2023-07-15

Jun 20, 2023 under review translates to: June 20, 2023 is currently being reviewed.

Jul 14, 2023 Required Reviews Completed translates to: July 14, 2023, all required reviews have been completed.

灰灰 2023-07-13

Do you have any questions for the editor?

Wei XP 2023-07-13

My paper was published in December last year, but it has not been indexed by SCI until now. How should I handle this situation?

luoyuxin 2023-07-13

Jul 10, 2023 With Editor

Zhuiguang 2023-07-11

How long does it usually take with the editor? Why has it been stuck like this all along?

有点可惜 2023-07-10

May 25, 2023 - Submitted to journal
May 27, 2023 - With editor
May 29, 2023 - Under review
June 21, 2023 - Required reviews completed/minor revision
July 9, 2023 - Minor revision
July 10, 2023 - With editor
July 11, 2023 - Accepted

luoyuxin 2023-07-10

Jun 29, 2023 without peer Revise review editorial review
Translation: On June 29, 2023, the review for revision without peer and editorial review was completed.

Jul 09, 2023 Revision Submitted to Journal
Translation: On July 09, 2023, the revision was submitted to the journal.

灰灰 2023-07-10

7.3, 7.5, and 7.7 changed three times under time.

Cola-Guan 2023-07-08

Posted on July 4th.
On July 5th, due to incomplete information of the recommended reviewers, it was requested to be completed. The completion was resubmitted on the same day.
On July 6th, with editor. Hoping it can be under review.

灰灰 2023-07-07

投的 means "submitted" or "filed"
under means "under review" or "being processed"

So the translation would be:
Submitted on June 29th, under review on July 3rd, under review on July 5th.

沐沐沐熙 2023-07-06

My situation is that after the review was completed, the editor suggested submitting to this journal. After submitting in the system, I received an email from this journal stating that I need to complete the submission or address the technical comments before resubmitting. I would like to ask if anyone has had a similar experience?

沐沐沐熙 2023-07-06

Do I need to make modifications based on the comments given by the first journal's reviewers when transferring to this journal? When submitting to the new journal after making modifications, should I reply to the first journal's reviewers' comments in the format specified by the new journal? Should it be named "response" or "cover letter"? Do I need to highlight the revised version when submitting to the new journal?

Ran极 2023-07-04

July 04, 2023 under review, the time has been updated. Please, dear reviewer, have a kind heart. ????

Buer 2023-06-30

received 26 November 2022;
Received in revised form 6 May 2023;
Accepted 23 June 2023

The revision took a bit longer, extending it by 2 months.
Overall, the speed was fast and the reviewers were responsible. After the revision, the quality of the paper has improved!
Materials Today sub-journal is trustworthy. It has requirements for the novelty of research topics. A pleasant publishing experience.

Crusade 2023-06-29

Last June, when I submitted it for repair, after a period of time, the JCR partition was updated and Q2 became Q3, and it was accepted in less than a week. It seems to have returned to Q2 this year. There is a bit of regret and helplessness.

今晚吃鸡 2023-06-28

6.26 I edited and reviewed my own work, marking the areas where I made changes based on the previous reviewer's comments. I also noticed that the referencing style was inconsistent and needed to be corrected. It took me two days to make the necessary revisions before submitting it again.

6.28 First revised submission.

billions1943 2023-06-28

Rejected, but the process was relatively fast. Regarding a bug mentioned in the article, six questions were raised, two of which were on point. The other questions could potentially lead to further research topics, and the reviewers seemed to express an unstoppable pouring of opinions, perhaps attempting to demonstrate expertise? It's a bit difficult to understand. The bug is my problem, and it seems that the laboratory does not want to provide funding and resources anymore. I can only revise the expression and submit to another journal.

素昕 2023-06-27

2.12 submitted to journal
3.8 Major revision
3.24 Return
4.18 Minor revision
4.21 Return
5.8 Minor revision
5.10 Return
5.13 Accepted

It took three months, with one major revision and two minor revisions. The reviewers were very thorough and responsible. Best wishes for the continued success of the journal!

霍大大 2023-06-27

6.15 Submitted to Journal
6.20 with editor
6.21-Present under review

luoyuxin 2023-06-27

Jun 26, 2023 Submitted to Journal