shenxiu 2022-08-09

OP, haven't you received the results yet? I have accepted and proofread it, but it has been almost a month and it is still not online. I am also very anxious. I don't know if anyone else has encountered this situation.

SCI嫌疑人 2022-08-08

"Under review" means it is undergoing external audit. Generally, open-source projects undergo external audit quickly (I don't know why mine is taking so long).

努力123 2022-08-08

How can I determine if the document has been sent for external review? Does "under review" mean it has been sent for review? Or will I receive an email notification when it is sent for external review?

SCI嫌疑人 2022-08-08

No need to look at that one. It's just a normal academic paper of 5 to 6 thousand words. However, mine is still being reviewed by external experts, even though I have already reminded them twice. (Mine is probably the longest paper in terms of external review time for this journal.)

努力123 2022-08-07

May I ask how to determine if the document has been sent for external review? Does "Under Review" mean it has been sent for review?

南辞 2022-08-05

Mine is also an original article, but I wrote it with a normal word count of around five to six thousand. I didn't even notice there was a word limit, but now it has already been published online.

shenxiu 2022-08-04

No, my word count is already very long, there is no such limitation.

维思未来 2022-08-03

Excuse me, may I ask, according to the author guidelines of this journal, it states that the word count for an original article should not exceed 2500 words, which is only about three to four pages. Isn't this word limit too low? Did I misunderstand something or is there a specific reason for it? Usually, it seems that most journals require around five to six thousand words for original articles.

维思未来 2022-08-03

May I ask, according to the author guidelines of this journal, it states that the word count for an original article should not exceed 2500 words, which is only about three to four pages. Isn't this word count too low? Did I misunderstand something or is there a specific reason for this? Other journals usually allow articles of five to six thousand words for this type of content...

维思未来 2022-08-03

Hello, OP. Congratulations on your acceptance. I have a question: according to the Author Guidelines of this journal, the word count for an Original Article should not exceed 2500 words, which is only about three to four pages. Isn't this word limit too low? Did I misunderstand something or is there a specific reason for this? Because other journals typically have a word count of around five to six thousand words for this type of article, which seems more reasonable...

维思未来 2022-08-03

May I trouble you to clarify? The Author Guidelines of this journal state that the word count for an Original Article should not exceed 2500 words, which is equivalent to only three to four pages. Isn't this word limit too low? Did I misunderstand something or is there a specific reason for this?

维思未来 2022-08-03

Excuse me, could you please clarify? The Author Guidelines of this journal state that the word count for an Original Article should not exceed 2500 words, which is equivalent to only three to four pages. Isn't this word limit too low? Did I misunderstand something or is there a specific reason for this? Other journals typically allow articles of five to six thousand words, which seems more reasonable...

shenxiu 2022-08-01

There is no specific reference format. You can create a template based on someone else's format.

Putin the great 2022-07-19

Hello, I would like to ask where I can download the format for the reference list. I couldn't find it. Is there an EndNote style? Could you please send it to me? Thank you.

dddyyy 2022-07-18

SUBMITTED MAY 10, 2022
FINAL REVISIONS SUBMITTED JUNE 22, 2022
ACCEPTED JULY 7, 2022

SCI嫌疑人 2022-07-16

Until now, it has been 3 months and it is still "Under Review" (feeling really exhausted). I sent a gentle reminder letter and received the following response: "Thank you for your email. Based on our system, we have received one review and are currently waiting for responses from several invited reviewers. Once we have gathered enough reviews for your paper and a decision is made, you will be immediately notified." Then, there is some mention of uncertain factors in collecting opinions and the inability to predict the review time, followed by a thank you for your patience. I don't know if I should continue waiting.

南辞 2022-06-25

2022.04.29, Submission
2022.06.01, Major revision
2022.6.18, Re-examination after repair
2022.6.25, Accepted

shenxiu 2022-06-07

My undergoing initial checking status is relatively short. After a major overhaul, it will be undergoing initial checking for two or three days, and then it will be under review. Please wait a little longer.

热9999 2022-06-07

Hello! I have returned from my major repair for over a week now, and the status is still undergoing initial checking. Is this normal?

shenxiu 2022-06-07

Submission: 2022.2.12

First review decision: 2022.3.3 Major revision

Revision submitted: 2022.5.11 Under review

Second review decision: 2022.5.30 Minor revision

Revision submitted: 2022.6.4

Acceptance: 2022.6.6

The reviewers and editors were quite prompt in their handling, the main reason for the delay was that I took a long time to make the revisions. The major revision required redoing the entire experiment and content. Both the major and minor revisions were given a two-month time frame for modification. Best wishes!

shenxiu 2022-06-07

Submission: 2022.2.12
First review decision: 2022.3.3 Major revisions
Revised submission: 2022.5.11 Under review
Second review decision: 2022.5.30 Minor revisions
Revised submission: 2022.6.4
Accepted: 2022.6.6
The reviewers and editors have been quite prompt in their handling of the manuscript. The main reason for the delay was that I took a long time to make the revisions, as the major revisions required me to redo the entire experiment and content. Both the major and minor revisions allowed for a two-month modification period. Best wishes!

xjtu.tum 2022-06-03

The first review took two months, and I have already given my timeline. I have seen papers that were reviewed quickly, within one or two months, and others that took even half a year or longer to be accepted.

xjtu.tum 2022-06-03

Yes, after the repair, it will undergo initial checking. This status lasts for approximately 3-7 days, and then it will change to Under Review.

奶茶不要茶 2022-06-02

May I ask how long it takes for you to give renovation suggestions? It has been nearly 50 days and it is still under review.

热9999 2022-06-02

After the submission of the major revisions, the status of the paper is "undergoing initial checking." May I ask if you also had the same experience back then?

shenxiu 2022-05-29

I am too, mine is also slow. From reading other people's comments, it seems like theirs is pretty fast, but I still haven't received any updates on mine.

SZLXL 2022-05-25

24-Sep-2021: Submitted
02-Nov-2021: Major revision
07-Dec-2021: Submit the revision
05-Jan-2022: Accept

Translation:
24-Sep-2021: Submitted
02-Nov-2021: Major revision
07-Dec-2021: Submit the revision
05-Jan-2022: Accept

chs 2022-05-25

How long does it take to give feedback on the review information? What is your current situation?

奶茶不要茶 2022-05-23

May I ask if you have received the results? I submitted mine on April 15th and it is still under review. Before submitting, I saw comments below that the results would be out in about a month (either for revisions or rejection). The most recent comment mentioned receiving revision suggestions after about two months. It's been tough...

xjtu.tum 2022-05-04

received: 17-Dec-2021
major revision: 14-Feb-2022
submit the revision: 05-Apr-2022
minor revision: 19-Apr-2022
submit the revision: 19-Apr-2022
minor revision: 25-Apr-2022
submit the revision: 26-Apr-2022
accepted: 04-May-2022

First review by two reviewers, who provided over 10 modification suggestions (most of them were not difficult to address, but a few required a significant amount of time to modify). The editor requested major revisions. In the second review, one reviewer agreed to accept the paper, while the other provided three minor suggestions. The editor requested minor revisions. After returning the revised paper, a few days later, the same reviewer raised a few formatting issues (stating that fixing these formatting issues would lead to acceptance). The editor requested minor revisions again. Once the requested modifications were made and the paper was resubmitted, the editor did not send it for further review and directly accepted it (although it is possible that the editor only processes submissions once a week, resulting in an eight-day delay in notification). Overall, the submission process did not pose significant difficulties, and it seems that the editor values the opinions of the reviewers.