宇宙系浪漫 2022-03-30

Hello~ May I ask, I have been submitting my work for over 2 months. It started with "Under Review" (capital "R"), which lasted for almost a month, then changed to "Under review" (lowercase "r"), which lasted for over a month. These past two days, it suddenly changed back to "Under Review" (capital "R"). What does this mean? Could it possibly be sent for external review?

会飞的咸鱼456 2022-03-30

Equivalent to a major revision and rejection, it is a significant revision.

silkyrose 2022-03-30

May I ask, have both of the manuscripts been processed, OP? If two manuscripts are submitted using one account, will one of them be rejected? Thank you.

ppqppz 2022-03-29

The first paper, IOTJ, is currently undergoing major revisions. This paper has been rejected by TCOMM and TWC consecutively, and ultimately submitted for major revisions to IOTJ.

Zealous_Citizen 2022-03-28

I forgot about this, but it seems that it will become capitalized both before and after sending it for external review.

TheShine 2022-03-28

What is the difference between "revise and resubmit" and "major revision"?

WarrenWang 2022-03-27

Just asking, after you resubmitted, did "under review" change to lowercase or did it remain uppercase? After my second resubmission, "under" has always been in uppercase, and then I got admitted directly after a month. I'm so nervous.

Zealous_Citizen 2022-03-26

Sorry, it was reviewed twice and changed twice.

Zealous_Citizen 2022-03-26

Submitted to Journal 2021.09.30
Under Review 2021.09.30
Under review 2021.10.03
Under review 2021.10.04
Awaiting Decision 2021.11.03
Reject (revise and resubmit) 2021.11.05

Resubmit 2022.01.13
Under Review 2022.01.13
Under review 2022.01.13
Awaiting Decision 2022.02.05
Minor Revision 2022.02.07
Submit 2022.02.13
Under review 2022.02.13
Under Review 2022.03.14
Awaiting Decision 2022.03.15
Accept 2022.03.18

Three reviewers, a total of three revisions. The first revision after rejection and resubmission was the most difficult, taking over two months. The following two revisions were minor. The average review cycle was one month per revision. Some comments mentioned that it was slow, which may vary by field.

Meta 2022-03-26

I submitted two articles with two different accounts on March 6th and March 26th respectively. The article numbers between the two submissions differ by 251, which means that IOTJ receives approximately 12.5 submissions per day.

黑色闪电 2022-03-26

Overall, the level of the reviewers is acceptable. At least they do not pretend to understand when they don't. The neighboring tits are really difficult to deal with.

黑色闪电 2022-03-26

The two reviewers are really lucky!

黑色闪电 2022-03-26

It is becoming increasingly difficult to invest.

李洪伟2683 2022-03-25

Two reviewers, I'm so lucky. Previously, I had nine reviewers...

李洪伟2683 2022-03-25

The warning is fake, everyone can ignore it and feel free to submit. This journal has strong support from many academicians, and it may enter CCF A in the near future.

李洪伟2683 2022-03-25

The warning is false, everyone can ignore it and feel free to submit. This journal has the support of academicians and may enter CCF A in the near future.

BBLLyyds 2022-03-24

I'm very sorry for mistakenly writing "Chinese Academy of Sciences" as "China Securities Regulatory Commission". Now, China Securities Regulatory Commission has also denied it, which is great! Because I am also a victim, but in my school, there is indeed no evaluation.

wale 2022-03-24

Excuse me, does the original poster have any updates now? I have also been waiting for over half a month.

Zealous_Citizen 2022-03-23

Two to three days, this probably depends on the editing you are assigned.

wchenei 2022-03-23

Already two months have passed, under review, the result is unknown.

叽叽歪歪s 2022-03-21

Within a week, each manuscript may have slight differences.

Superb 2022-03-20

Guys, how long did it take for your "Awaiting Decision" status? It's been 22 days for me and I still haven't heard anything. Seeking help.

孙利民 2022-03-15

This contains the detailed investigation results of the Research Cat. Everyone can take a look: http://u6.gg/k53pq

孙利民 2022-03-15

Latest Announcement: This false alert has been debunked by the Science and Research Cat public account. The so-called list was released under the name of the Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine College (an unknown school) pretending to be from the China Institute of Communications. Currently, Science and Research Cat has contacted the China Institute of Communications for verification, and they stated: "No warning journal for the year 2021 has been released!" Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine College has also removed this false alert. Therefore, it is now fully evident that the warning is fake!!!

孙利民 2022-03-15

Latest news: This false warning has been debunked by the Science Cat public account. The so-called list was released under the name of the Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine College (an unknown school) pretending to be from the China Information Institute. Currently, Science Cat has called the China Information Institute for verification, and the China Information Institute stated that they have not released any warning journal for 2021! Furthermore, the Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine College has also removed this false warning. Therefore, it is now fully evident that the warning is false!!!

孙利民 2022-03-15

This false warning has already been debunked by the Scientific Research Cat WeChat account. The so-called list was released under the name of the Hebei University of Chinese Medicine (an unknown school) pretending to be from the China Institute of Communications. Currently, Scientific Research Cat has contacted the China Institute of Communications for verification, and they stated that they have not released any warning journal for 2021. The Hebei University of Chinese Medicine has also removed this false warning. Therefore, it has now been fully clarified that the warning is false!

孙利民 2022-03-15

Dear scholars: This false warning has already been debunked by the Science Cat public account. The so-called list was released under the name of the Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine University (an unknown school) pretending to be from the China Information Institute. Currently, Science Cat has contacted the China Information Institute for verification, and they have stated that they did not release any warning journal for the year 2021! Furthermore, the Hebei Traditional Chinese Medicine University has also removed this false warning.

Therefore, it is now fully evident that the warning is false!!!

羊羊爱吃草 2022-03-11

What's the use of it? After being messed up by these amateurs, it has already spread. Now, most universities dare not recognize IoTJ anymore. I've asked several and they all said no.

羊羊爱吃草 2022-03-11

mdpi and Hindawi, under the umbrella of Wiley, have so many open-access water journals, but not a single warning, instead they issue warnings for IoT.
Clearly, it is a list made by a group of highly unprofessional people. Now they are even refusing to admit it and claiming they have never released it.
The so-called blacklist issued by CITIC is truly a group of unprofessional, irresponsible, and shameless individuals.

羊羊爱吃草 2022-03-11

MDPI, Hindawi, and the numerous open-access water journals under Wiley have not received any warnings, instead they are warning about IoT. It is obvious that these are wild rankings made by a group of highly unprofessional individuals. Now they are being dishonest and refusing to admit that they have never published anything. It is truly a group of unprofessional, irresponsible, and shameless individuals at Zhongxin Institute.