认证评论 - Science Bulletin
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

天才Gini 2021-01-31

Without the endorsement of big shots in the field, it is now difficult to get a manuscript reviewed; in this regard, it is quite similar to Nature and PNAS.

1233321 2021-01-27

Just stick to the facts. Started by submitting to a top journal, received 2 revisions and 1 rejection. Then submitted to Science Bulletin but did not get it reviewed. Submitted to another journal with an impact factor of around 7, received excellent reviews, with one in the top 5% and another in the top 10%. Was invited to be featured on the cover but decided to pass on this opportunity.

hy1983 2021-01-25

The problems with Chinese journals are even greater, everyone knows that. Yet, they still insist on establishing Chinese journals, making fairness even more non-existent.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now