swz 2023-05-16

Do we have to send an email for external audit?

0xff 2023-05-15

Urgently graduating, I completed two papers within three months, each taking about a month.

丫丫 2023-05-14

Hello! How long did it take for your manuscript to be published and indexed?

丫丫 2023-05-14

Has your manuscript been retrieved?

丫丫 2023-05-14

Have your manuscript been indexed?

想快点跑路 2023-05-13

Brother, how do I urge the submission? It has been 46 days since the external review.

articles 2023-05-12

How long does it usually take to receive comments after the first trial?

articles 2023-05-12

May I ask how long it usually takes for the first trial to provide feedback?

xxxt 2023-05-10

Does "under review" in this journal mean it has been sent for external review? I saw comments saying that when it is sent for external review, an email will be received, but I haven't received any email.

想快点跑路 2023-05-10

The text translates to: "The external review was submitted on March 28th, and it has been 53 days already. Should we send an email to ask about it?"

ljrprocc 2023-05-09

I received it on the same day. If it takes too long, it's better to remind them.

DomOConner 2023-05-09

May I ask how long it will take to receive the email for external review? It has been 15 days and I haven't received it yet. Should I send an email to remind them?

秋裤。 2023-05-06

"Are you so sure about that?"

xiaiphu 2023-05-06

As long as you send it for external review, you will win. If you like it fast, you can make a submission.

top不是梦 2023-05-04

Can't this journal be resubmitted only once?

ljrprocc 2023-05-04

Shuibao, the lab agreed to submit an article to an OA journal. In the future, we won't pursue an academic path, so I wanted to share this experience:
March 31, 2023 - Submitted
March 31, 2023 - Under Review
May 4, 2023 - Accepted. One reviewer rejected it and suggested resubmission, but another reviewer accepted it. The editor recommended acceptance as well. On the same day, we finalized the version and submitted it.
Personally, I believe if we are not planning to pursue an academic path and are eager to graduate, we can submit this article. It has a good cost-performance ratio, and the comments provided were quite fair. However, I suspect that it may have caused some trouble for certain groups, leading to a bad reputation.

Zeeeeee 2023-05-04

2022.11.4 submit
2022.11.20 reject by two reviewers.
2023.1.11 resubmit after revising the response.
2023.1.29 reject with one reviewer satisfied with the revisions and one rejecting due to language errors.
2023.2.15 resubmit after polishing.
2023.4.24 accept with the same reviewers satisfied with the revisions. This time it took a long time, reminded once, and was under review throughout.
2023.5.2 online.

T昱T 2023-05-04

2023.02.25 Submit initial draft
2023.04.02 Three reviewers, one accepted, one minor revision, one major revision, valuable feedback for revisions
2023.04.06 Submit revised draft
2023.05.03 Accepted

土木老哥 2023-05-04

Submission and revision were done three times in total. In the first submission, 2 were accepted and 1 was rejected; after revision, the first two reviewers accepted it without any comments, while the last reviewer didn't even carefully review it and raised questions that were already explained in the text, resulting in a hard rejection. Subsequently, an email was sent to question the reviewers and request a change, but it was rejected. In the third submission, a new reviewer accepted it and raised some friendly questions. However, the reviewers who rejected it twice before insisted on rejecting it again, raising a bunch of detailed issues regarding titles, images, and chapters. The final opinion was to reject it and not accept any further resubmissions. The reviewer who rejected it raised different issues each time, deliberately searching for problems, even though the explanations for the raised issues were already present in the text. It was purely a rejection for the sake of rejection. The editor's explanation was also far-fetched, refuting the reviewer's opinions by claiming a lack of innovation, even though the rejection letter did not mention anything about innovation. They also insisted on a lack of comparison with traditional methods, even though there was an entire section in the discussion dedicated to it. This whole process wasted several months of time and energy, and even wasted money on proofreading. Overall, this review process lacked any semblance of fairness, at least in my case.

DomOConner 2023-05-03

May I ask how long it takes for it to be sent for review after it becomes "under review"? I have not received the email for external review, and it has been ten days since it became "under review".

SDFJID 2023-05-02

2023.3.15 submitted
2023.3.22 under review
2023.4.28 accepted
All four reviewers have accepted with minor edits. The reviewers' comments were fair, and only a few textual errors need to be corrected. I did not submit the program, which is probably the reason for the delay in the review process for my paper.

ieee li 2023-05-02

On May 1st, an email was sent requesting a video for review.

好难过xcx 2023-05-01

Excuse me, how can I urge them? I have already sent it back for external review for ten days and still haven't received any updates. It's quite urgent.

hong h 2023-04-30

2023.4.05 submitted
2023.4.10 under review
2023.4.28 accepted
Both reviewers accepted with minor edits. The editor accepted the changes directly. The first reviewer provided 12 suggestions, all of which were minor and insignificant. The second reviewer had no comments.
Overall, the submission process was good. I had to remind them twice about my submission. In my opinion, the quality of the paper was decent, but I submitted it to an access journal to meet the deadline. Luckily, the reviewers were not too difficult (or maybe they were not highly skilled).
By the way, does anyone know how to pay the publication fee? Is it possible to pay without a credit card?

articles 2023-04-29

Is there a time limit for resubmission after rejection for this journal?

top不是梦 2023-04-29

4.18 reject (reviewer 1: reject updates required before resubmission, reviewer 2: accept minor editor)
4.29 resubmitted

Translation: The text was rejected on April 18th. Reviewer 1 recommended rejecting the updates that were required before resubmission, while reviewer 2 accepted minor edits. The text was resubmitted on April 29th.

ieee li 2023-04-29

2023/04/21 submitted
2023/04/22-present under review
Brothers, how long did you all wait before giving your opinions?

Adam 2023-04-27

May I ask how long it will take to get the results after reapplying? It has been 11 days since I resubmitted, and I still haven't received any updates.

xiaiphu 2023-04-27

2023.2.16 submitted
2023.3.14 Two reviewers provided 4 comments.
2023.3.25 Accepted
Many formulas and figures, as long as it undergoes external review, it will be approved.

好难过xcx 2023-04-21

Our directions are similar, I also work on graph neural networks. My two reviewers are okay, let's not get upset and submit to other journals. I want to submit this quickly for the comprehensive assessment next semester, otherwise, other options will be too slow.