ekyyy 2023-06-12

After general submission, it will be allocated within 3-5 days.

ekyyy 2023-06-12

I submitted my work on the same day as you, and it is still under review.

songhost 2023-06-11

2023.5.18 Submitted
2023.5.23 Under Review (Received review email, specifically for best video award)
2023.6.16 Reject (updates required before resubmission)
2023.6.25 Re-submitted (given new number)
2023.6.26 Under Review (Received review email)
2023.7.12 Accept, final draft submitted

Chris PENG 2023-06-10

Excuse me, how long does it take to allocate ADM? Why do I only have EIC after voting, and not ADM allocation?

跃动青春 2023-06-09

2023.5.4 Submission
2023.5.8 Review
2023.5.23 Rejection and resubmission - Two reviewers, one accepts, one requests resubmission
2023.5.25 Submission
2023.6.5 Acceptance - Two reviewers, one accepts, one requests resubmission (no comments, weak innovation) Editor decides to accept.

Chris PENG 2023-06-09

I would like to ask about my current status, which has just changed to "under review." I have received an ID number, but the system says that ScholarOne will send further instructions via email. Where should I expect to receive this email? I don't have any adm email.

Chris PENG 2023-06-09

Is it so slow now?

qiguobin 2023-06-09

4.6 Submission
6.3 Feedback received, rejection, four out of five reviewers recommend acceptance with minor edits. Two reviewers did not provide any specific comments. One reviewer stated, "It is technically sound and the derivatives information support all claims. I have no other comments about the revision." Another reviewer mentioned, "Well researched." However, there were some issues with the accuracy of my validation set, which need to be addressed. Reviewer 3 rejected the paper, stating that updates are required before resubmission. They also mentioned some grammatical issues and insufficient detail in the experimental analysis.
6.9 Resubmission

7.14 Acceptance
7.16 Payment made via credit card
7.17 Early Access is now available, DOI assigned, and the order status on CCC changed from "Not Yet Paid" to "Paid."
7.18 The paper has been recorded in ORCID, and an email has been sent with a link to access the paper on Early Access (although it was already accessible the previous day). However, the bank statement has not been received, and the reason is unknown.

top不是梦 2023-06-08

Has it been over a month since the second review and still no news? Is it because there are too many manuscripts recently?

孙局 2023-06-08

I would like to ask if this email indicates that the article has been submitted for external review. We have started the review process for your article, but we also wanted to inform you about the "2022 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 2," which is explained below.

Adam 2023-06-08

I am the same. It has been 20 days since the first trial, and it has been almost two months since the second trial, but there is still no news.

我要糖 2023-06-08

2023.3.31 First submission.
2023.4.4 External review begins.
2023.4.14 Received reviewer comments. (Two rejections with encouragement to resubmit, two reviewers provided 7 constructive comments.)
2023.5.6 Second submission.
2023.5.10 Second external review begins.
It has been almost a month and there has been no response to any comments. I have sent two reminders, but each time I received a template response. Why is the second review taking longer than the first one? I would like to ask for advice on what to do in this situation.

孙局 2023-06-08

I would like to ask whether "Under Review" means that it has already been submitted for review or not. It has been more than ten days, and an ADM has been assigned, but there has been no other email notification stating that it has been submitted for review or any other notification.

Chris PENG 2023-06-05

May I ask which zone this journal belongs to? Why is it classified as Zone 4 in our school's library retrieval system? Because it was downgraded a few years ago.

jinjin826 2023-06-02

Hello, may I ask how long your first trial lasted?

我爱学习haha 2023-06-02

What is the likelihood of this journal being rejected in the second review?

jinjin826 2023-06-02

No results yet, still waiting for another reviewer. I'm feeling numb, it's been really slow recently. To urge for the submission, you can directly send an email to ADM through ScholarOne, which is quite convenient.

wfSCI 2023-06-02

May I ask where to submit the manuscript? Should I contact the editor who sent the external review email?

lqkaka 2023-06-02

Hello, may I ask if the results are out?

做多中国 2023-05-31

May I ask how to expedite the external review process if I only see EIC after submitting my manuscript, without the assignment of ADM and without receiving the email for external review?

虎三彪 2023-05-31

I encountered the same problem as you, can we talk about it? I have added you as a friend.

jinjin826 2023-05-30

First review, if the reminder is not a template reply, it can provide some psychological comfort, so as not to be too anxious during the waiting process. Otherwise, it really doesn't have much effect.

AKON123 2023-05-30

Submitted on 4.17, similar to yours. Do we need to follow up on this situation? And will following up be effective?

我爱学习haha 2023-05-30

Hello, may I ask if you are the first reviewer or the second reviewer?

我爱学习haha 2023-05-30

Hello, may I ask if you are the first reviewer or the second reviewer?

jinjin826 2023-05-30

Still under review, it's really slow.

jinjin826 2023-05-30

"May I ask, OP, how long did it take you before and after the first trial?"

涛涛τ 2023-05-30

I want to ask everyone, if there are two reviewers, one rejects resubmission and the other accepts, and the editor accepts it, do we need to submit a response when submitting the final file? Do we need to make corrections for each suggestion? Will it be sent back for revisions?

top不是梦 2023-05-30

We will resubmit it for external review, resend the submission email, and also provide a new ID. It is similar to submitting it again.

涛涛τ 2023-05-30

Excuse me, if the reviewers reject it but the editor accepts it, should I still write a response? Should I make corresponding changes for each suggestion?