Scoundrel meets bastard 2021-04-20

I have been publicly called out by many teachers in the past because of my access to the topic.

厦门大学陈威 2021-04-19

Classmate, everyone I have encountered does not wear tinted glasses to look at IEEE Access. My advisor said as long as it is not copied, stolen, or academically dishonest, there is no need to be afraid.

科研仕子小马 2021-04-18

Nanophotonic devices in optics category. The supervisor has a strict requirement that the talent program must be in the basic version of the minor category two. Finally, several optical minor category two papers were submitted for review and all were rejected. After a year of submitting articles, only access met the requirements for completion.

沐雨飞雪 2021-04-16

The text is in Chinese and it translates to:

First external review by four experts: one accepted directly, two rejected and asked for resubmission, one rejected without the opportunity to resubmit, the editor gave a chance for resubmission to the rejected papers. It took half a month to write the response, totaling 8-9 pages. The second time for resubmission felt like there were a few different experts, but still four in total. The overall opinion was to add simulations, but the editor rejected it directly. To be honest, even if given another chance to resubmit the rejected paper, I do not have the ability to meet the simulation requirements of the reviewers, so I am no longer hopeful.

They all say this journal is not very good, there must be some issues. Especially in the field of computer science, it has been listed as a medium-level warning. Of course, besides computer science, there must be issues in other disciplines as well, but not all disciplines are problematic. I believe the quality of my paper is good, but it was still rejected. I have now submitted it to EMC.

mxd 2021-04-16

5 reviewers, 60 questions, all of them doubting the correctness of the model, the questions are very sharp, and after resubmission, it was rejected. Isn't it said to be very poor...

hyh007 2021-04-15

1.25 Submission, 3.8 Rejection, 3.16 Re-submission, 4.15 Acceptance. The first and second reviews were both done by the same reviewers.

How 2021-04-15

Not yet determined, does voting for this article have any special impact on certain schools' exams?

going 2021-04-15

Classmate, where do you want to take the exam?

How 2021-04-13

Welcome to any suggestions and rational discussions. Venting anger is of no help in improving one's academic level.

JUST-XIN 2021-04-13

The reviewer rejected the manuscript after reading it for 15 minutes, stating that the quality and depth of the paper did not meet the requirements of this journal. They do not accept resubmission.

How 2021-04-12

In order to pursue a doctoral degree, the master's student is wondering if everyone thinks the first paper in IEEE ACCESS is acceptable.

大黄鸭 2021-04-12

There are many official documents and hidden pictures. Water is quite healthy.

hyh007 2021-04-11

How many reviewers are there for the first round of review which takes two months?

sci冲 2021-04-08

Hello, may I ask if you have a template for this journal? I downloaded it from the official website but it cannot run. Thank you very much.

rolyn 2021-04-08

Has it been two months since the first instance of filing this year? Wasn't it just one week before?

rolyn 2021-04-08

I am too. I submitted on 2.25, but still haven't received any news. Is this journal so slow in its response?

hyh007 2021-04-08

My time is similar to yours. Submitted on 1.25, rejected on 3.8, resubmitted on 3.16, and now there is no news.

lyra 2021-04-08

Comrades, I have received my second review comments, which took exactly two months. I am sharing this information with you for your reference regarding the timeline.

lyra 2021-04-08

Isn't it 1750 now?

pegn 2021-04-07

ieee system journal ieee iot are both fast and suitable.

昨渊 2021-04-06

What's going on? Why is the review process so slow now? It has been two months and there is still no review result from my classmates. It's better to submit to IEEE sensors instead.

红苹果5枚 2021-04-06

Finally got ashore yesterday. The first trial took two months, and the second trial took 26 days. Hopefully, it will be useful to you.

lyra 2021-04-06

Brothers, my 2.8 investment has been unresponsive until now, causing distress.

红苹果5枚 2021-04-04

I am waiting anxiously for the revised submission, which took two months for the initial review and revision. The revised version was resubmitted on March 10th, and I am still eagerly awaiting the outcome. It's really slow now! Based on this speed, the review process is estimated to take around 4-5 months before a result is given.

最爱忆绪 2021-04-02

Let's not talk about how this journal is, just the quality of this building is extremely poor.

Clair 2021-03-28

Nature has made its content open-source, so why can't there be better open-access journals in the field of engineering? I hope Access continues to improve.

Clair 2021-03-28

Completely made up. Lacks basic academic literacy.

爱吃榴莲的研究员 2021-03-27

Because it is a pre-warning water journal. Universities do not allow the page fees of IEEE Access to be paid from project funds. If a doctoral graduate has IEEE Access, it will lower their value. When applying for funds, seeing articles with IEEE Access will reduce trust.

天龙八步半 2021-03-27

The translation of "真是人如其名" from Chinese to English is "Truly a person lives up to their name."

发篇nature 2021-03-26

Open access journals are a trend, and many top-notch achievements may not be published in top journals. On one hand, they claim "not to evaluate articles based on the journal", and on the other hand, they warn journals, essentially slapping themselves in the face.