PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

期刊名
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

PATHOL RES PRACT

ISSN / eISSN
0344-0338 / 1618-0631
目标和范围
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist's practice.
研究方向

病理学

CiteScore
5.40 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Medicine - Pathology and Forensic Medicine Q1 #42/193
Medicine - Cell Biology Q3 #168/274
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
PATHOLOGY - SCIE Q2
H-index
56
出版国家或地区
GERMANY
出版商
Urban und Fischer Verlag GmbH und Co. KG
出版周期
Monthly
出版年份
1978
年文章数
392
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG, OFFICE JENA, P O BOX 100537, JENA, GERMANY, 07705
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
After submitting the article, I followed up on the progress and kept receiving replies indicating that they were inviting experts and undergoing external review. Two and a half months later, I asked if the review from the editor had returned. The editor may have thought I was rushing them, as the very next day they provided a suggestion to submit to another journal. However, the journal they suggested turned out to be a predatory publication. In my email response, I mentioned that the journal they suggested was a predatory one and asked if they could provide any external review comments so I could improve the article. The email reply simply thanked me for waiting and stated that my feedback had been forwarded to the journal, who would contact me directly for further discussion and final decision. However, I never received a response to that email. When I logged back into the submission system, I found that the submission had been changed to a rejection. This journal is just unbelievable, they are unethical and do not take authors seriously. It was a complete waste of two and a half months. They kept saying that my article was not forgotten, but the truth is that it was indeed forgotten. As soon as I asked for an update, they immediately suggested submitting elsewhere. This is terrible.
2022-10-15
In general, I won't comment on the journal. However, they kept dragging me for six months without finding reviewers. Considering the impact of the pandemic and the upcoming Christmas and New Year holidays, I patiently waited. However, when they finally responded after six months, they rejected my paper, claiming it lacked innovation. Where is their conscience? This delay of six months could affect a student's ability to graduate or pursue a direct doctorate. It also caused me to miss out on a national scholarship. Some comments may suggest that the journal is good, but I can't speak for others. It was a terrible experience for me. I suggest withdrawing your paper if you haven't received any updates for two months and find another route. They were extremely unfriendly towards me. A negative review!
2022-12-05

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started