Journal of Nuclear Materials

期刊名
Journal of Nuclear Materials

J NUCL MATER

ISSN / eISSN
0022-3115
目标和范围
The Journal of Nuclear Materials publishes high quality papers in materials research for nuclear applications, primarily fission reactors, fusion reactors, and similar environments including radiation areas of charged particle accelerators. Both original research and critical review papers covering experimental, theoretical, and computational aspects of either fundamental or applied nature are welcome.

The breadth of the field is such that a wide range of processes and properties in the field of materials science and engineering is of interest to the readership, spanning atom-scale processes, microstructures, thermodynamics, mechanical properties, physical properties, and corrosion, for example.

Topics covered by JNM

Fission reactor materials, including fuels, cladding, core structures, pressure vessels, coolant interactions with materials, moderator and control components, fission product behavior.
Materials aspects of the entire fuel cycle.
Materials aspects of the actinides and their compounds.
Performance of nuclear waste materials; materials aspects of the immobilization of wastes.
Fusion reactor materials, including first walls, blankets, insulators and magnets.
Neutron and charged particle radiation effects in materials, including defects, transmutations, microstructures, phase changes and macroscopic properties.
Interaction of plasmas, ion beams, electron beams and electromagnetic radiation with materials relevant to nuclear systems.
研究方向

核科学技术

材料科学:综合

CiteScore
5.70 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Energy - Nuclear Energy and Engineering Q1 #10/68
Energy - Nuclear and High Energy Physics Q1 #18/81
Energy - General Materials Science Q2 #151/453
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q3
NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY - SCIE Q1
H-index
123
出版国家或地区
NETHERLANDS
出版商
Elsevier
出版周期
Semimonthly
出版年份
1959
年文章数
648
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Second article, still have to give a good review to the journal. The review speed is considered fast compared to what I have encountered, both in terms of submission and subsequent revisions. I can only say thank you to the nuclear materials editors and reviewers for their sharp and insightful comments (in the field of ion irradiation). Thank you, Mr. Was, for the quick reviews on both occasions!

They both provided feedback after one month of submission, major revisions took one month (usually spending 20 days carefully revising and responding to about 20-40 minor issues, sometimes correcting and providing suggestions for professional terms in the figure captions!). The second round of revisions took one month (nervous and anxious), and the minor revisions (usually very satisfied with the changes) were completed in a few days or supplemented with a small experimental verification. Anyway, my personal level is limited, but their feedback is really beneficial, and it greatly improves the quality. (Of course, different reviewers and editors have different issues.)

In theory, it is not difficult to understand, but it feels like some people are purposely giving a 2-star rating... Are they joking about themselves?
2022-02-15
Two reviewers, one asked a few normal questions, while the other one had absolutely no expertise and raised over twenty irrelevant rubbish questions. Just the transfer of data from supporting materials to the main text accounted for five questions. What's even more ridiculous is that they claimed there was an issue with the sequence of my data. This is really absurd. Although the quality of the article may be slightly poor, I have published two papers as the first author in June and October of 2021, one on 3M and the other on separation and purification techniques. I also regularly read literature, so there can't possibly be an issue with the sequence of my data. Is it that this reviewer, who considers themselves a big shot, has not read relevant literature, or am I truly lacking in knowledge? Despite all this, they still want me to resubmit the paper for consideration after making revisions. This is truly disruptive.
2022-01-23

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started