期刊名
Brain Sciences

BRAIN SCI

ISSN / eISSN
2076-3425 / 2076-3425
目标和范围
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
研究方向

神经科学

CiteScore
3.90 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Neuroscience - General Neuroscience Q3 #65/110
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
NEUROSCIENCES - SCIE Q3
出版国家或地区
Switzerland
出版商
MDPI (Basel, Switzerland)
出版年份
2011
年文章数
1667
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4052
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Two months after being hired, I received major revisions comments about three weeks after submitting my work. I sent an email requesting major revisions (one major revision and three minor revisions) to be made. There were four reviewers, one of whom was quite busy, and it took three days for the fourth reviewer to provide their comments after the major revisions were given. I was given ten days to make the revisions and I sent them back on the ninth day. A week later, I received notification for minor revisions. It was the first article in the series, and although it was open-source, I was still quite happy.
2022-08-22
Submitted on 7.12, the review process took two months, claiming that the foreign professor was on vacation. Four reviewers were assigned, with a ten-day revision period. After the revisions were made, it has been over 50 days with a pending editor decision. I have reminded the editor, and their response was that they are currently searching for a new academic editor. This is outrageous...
2022-10-30

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started