4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Increasing sodium intake from a previous low or high intake affects water, electrolyte and acid-base balance differently

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 1286-1294

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508088041

关键词

Salt intake; Sodium balance; Acid-base balance; Fluid retention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contrasting data are published on the effects of high salt intake (between 300 and 660 mmol/d) on Na balance and fluid retention. In some studies high levels of NaCl intake (400, 440, 550 and 660 mmol/d) led to positive Na balances without fluid retention. To test the relevance of different baseline NaCl intake levels on changes in metabolic water, Na, K, chloride and acid-base balance, a 28 d clinical trial ('Salty Life 6') was carried out in a metabolic ward. Nine healthy male volunteers (aged 25.7 (SD 3.1) years; body mass (BM) 71.4 (SD 4.0) kg) participated in the present study. Four consecutive levels of NaCl intake: low (6d, 0.7 mmol NaCl/kg BM per d), average normal (6d, 2.8 mmol NaCl/kg BM per d), high (10 d, 7.7 mmol NaCl/kg BM per d), and low again (6 d, 0.7 mmol NaCl/kg BM per d) were tested. Urine osmolality, extracellular volume (ECV) and plasma volume (PV), cumulative metabolic Na, K, chloride and fluid balances, mRNA expression of two glycosaminoglycan (GAG) polymerisation genes, capillary blood pH, bicarbonate and base excess were measured. During average normal NaCl intake, 193 (SEM 19) mmol Na were retained and ECV (+2.02 (SEM 0.31) litres; P<0.001) and PV (+0.57 (SEM 0.13) litres; P<0.001) increased. During high NaCl intake, 244 (SEM 77) mmol Na were retained but ECV did not increase (ECV -0.54 (SEM 0.30) litres, P=0.089; PV +0.27 (SEM 0.25) litres, P=0.283). mRNA expression of GAG polymerisation genes increased with rise in NaCl intake, while pH (P<0.01) and bicarbonate (P<0.001) levels decreased. We conclude that a high NaCl intake may increase GAG synthesis; this might play a role in osmotically inactive Na retention in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据