4.3 Article

Pathogenicity of three formulations of Beauveria bassiana and efficacy of autoinoculation devices and sterile fruit fly males for dissemination of conidia for the control of Ceratitis capitata

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 164, 期 3, 页码 340-349

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eea.12608

关键词

horizontal transmission; microbial control; entomopathogenic fungi; sterile insect technique; SIT; area-wide integrated pest management; Mediterranean fruit fly; Tephritidae; Diptera; Hypocreales; Medfly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the pathogenicity of three formulations of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Hypocreales) - Bb-ET, GHA, and Bb-AES - and their application in panel-type and cylinder-type autoinoculation devices, and using sterile males as vectors for the control of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in coffee-producing areas of the Central Highlands of Guatemala. Using sterile adults of C.capitata under laboratory bioassays, mean lethal concentrations (LC50) of 1.4x10(7), 2.4x10(6), and 8.2x10(5) conidiaml(-1), and median survival times of 4.1 +/- 0.1, 4.2 +/- 0.1, and 3.8 +/- 0.1days, were recorded for the strains GHA, Bb-AES, and Bb-ET, respectively. These values indicate that the three strains were sufficiently pathogenic and that their period of biological activity was considered adequate for using sterile flies as vectors of the inoculum. Observed percentages of sporulated wild C.capitata flies were 57.3, 44.7, and 44.3% for sterile fly vectors, panel devices, and cylinder devices, respectively. The total population reduction at the end of the study period was over 90% for the three treatments. Our results show that sterile males used as vectors or disseminator devices may represent a new control method for area-wide integrated management of Mediterranean fruit flies. The potential of this new approach and its integration with other control methods, including the sterile insect technique, is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据