4.7 Article

Effect of heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on anaerobic granular sludge performance and microbial community for the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 314, 期 -, 页码 51-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.024

关键词

Toxicity assessment; Anaerobic granular sludge; Heterogeneous fenton-like Pre-treatment; Microbial community dynamics

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2015GXNSFAA139267, 2013GXNSFBA019213]
  2. University Key Laboratory of Karst Ecology and Environmental Change of Guangxi Province [YRHJ15Z006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of a heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on the anaerobic processes, characteristics and microbial community of sludge was investigated for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) wastewater containing rhein. When the concentrations of rhein were 50 mg/L and 100 mg/L, the toxic effect was physiological toxicity for anaerobic granular sludge. Using a single double circle (DC) reactor for the treatment of TCM wastewater containing rhein at concentrations of 15-20 mg/L, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate was 69%, and coenzyme F-420 was nearly undetectable in the 3D-excitation emission matrix (EEM) spectra of soluble microbial products (SMP). The abundances of Methanoregula, Methanobacterium, Methanosphaerula were only 5.57%, 2.39% and 1.08% in the DC reactor, respectively. TCM wastewater containing rhein could be successfully treated by the combination of the heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment and the DC reactor processes, and the COD removal rate reached 95%. Meanwhile, the abundances of Methanoregula, Methanobacterium, Methanosphaerula increased to 22.5%, 18.5%, and 13.87%, respectively. For the bacterial community, the abundance of Acidobacteria_Gp6 decreased from 6.99% to 1.07%, while the abundances of Acidobacteria_Gp1 and Acidobacteria_Gp2 increased from 1.61% to 6.55% and from 1.28% to 5.87%, respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据