4.7 Article

Overall Survival Results From the POLO Trial: A Phase III Study of Active Maintenance Olaparib Versus Placebo for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 40, 期 34, 页码 3929-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.01604

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Aduro Biotech (Inst)
  2. AstraZeneca (Inst)
  3. GlaxoSmithKline (Inst)
  4. Merck (Inst)
  5. Verastem (Inst)
  6. Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst)
  7. Polaris (Inst)
  8. Deciphera (Inst)
  9. Inhibrx (Inst)
  10. Roche/Genentech (Inst)
  11. Tesaro (Inst)
  12. MacroGenics (Inst)
  13. Leap Therapeutics (Inst)
  14. FibroGen (Inst)
  15. Vivace Therapeutics (Inst)
  16. Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst)
  17. Harpoon Therapeutics (Inst)
  18. Bayer (Inst)
  19. Seattle Genetics (Inst)
  20. Blueprint Medicines (Inst)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The POLO study demonstrated that active olaparib maintenance therapy did not show a statistically significant overall survival benefit for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but did show significant benefits in other secondary endpoints.
PURPOSEThe phase III POLO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for active olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA mutation. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and other secondary end points.PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation whose disease had not progressed after >= 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:2 to active maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included OS, time to second disease progression or death, time to first and second subsequent cancer therapies or death, time to discontinuation of study treatment or death, and safety and tolerability.RESULTSIn total, 154 patients were randomly assigned (olaparib, n = 92; placebo, n = 62). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed (median 19.0 v 19.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.22; P = .3487). Kaplan-Meier OS curves separated at approximately 24 months, and the estimated 3-year survival after random assignment was 33.9% versus 17.8%, respectively. Median time to first subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001), time to second subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0111), and time to discontinuation of study treatment or death (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.63; P < .0001) significantly favored olaparib. The HR for second disease progression or death favored olaparib without reaching statistical significance (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.02; P = .0613). Olaparib was well tolerated with no new safety signals.CONCLUSIONAlthough no statistically significant OS benefit was observed, the HR numerically favored olaparib, which also conferred clinically meaningful benefits including increased time off chemotherapy and long-term survival in a subset of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据