期刊名
IEEE Systems Journal

IEEE SYST J

ISSN / eISSN
1932-8184 / 1937-9234
目标和范围
This publication provides a systems-level, focused forum for application-oriented manuscripts that address complex systems and system-of-systems of national and global significance. It intends to encourage and facilitate cooperation and interaction among IEEE Societies with systems-level and systems engineering interest, and to attract non-IEEE contributors and readers from around the globe. Our IEEE Systems Council job is to address issues in new ways that are not solvable in the domains of the existing IEEE or other societies or global organizations. These problems do not fit within traditional hierarchical boundaries. For example, disaster response such as that triggered by Hurricane Katrina, tsunamis, or current volcanic eruptions is not solvable by pure engineering solutions. We need to think about changing and enlarging the paradigm to include systems issues.
研究方向

计算机:信息系统

工程:电子与电气

运筹学与管理科学

CiteScore
9.10 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Computer Science - Computer Science Applications Q1 #84/792
Computer Science - Control and Systems Engineering Q1 #33/286
Computer Science - Computer Networks and Communications Q1 #44/379
Computer Science - Electrical and Electronic Engineering Q1 #87/738
Computer Science - Information Systems Q1 #53/379
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS - SCIE Q2
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q2
OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE - SCIE Q2
TELECOMMUNICATIONS - SCIE Q2
H-index
54
出版国家或地区
UNITED STATES
出版商
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
出版周期
Quarterly
年文章数
479
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Same experience as the 20th floor, but it only took me a total of one and a half months to return after the first review. The evaluations from the first two reviewers were good for minor revisions, and the third reviewer's major evaluation was also good. However, the fourth reviewer was speechless. I was inspired by a primary reference paper for this work, and their comment stated that I seemed to be an incremental improvement of that paper, but I did not clearly explain the novelty and the model was not well explained. In theory, this should be a suggestion for revision, but all of his scores were the lowest option. The editor disregarded the scores and evaluations from the first three reviewers and rejected the paper directly.
2022-05-27
2021.12.09 Submission
2022.02.05 Major revision, 3 reviewers, one of whom has a lot of comments and requests additional literature research and more extensive and larger-scale simulation results.
2022.03.02 Submitted revised manuscript, still waiting.
Currently, the review process is indeed not fast. I have seen many people here expressing this issue. I originally wanted to get accepted before graduation, but it turned out to be a mistake. However, the reviewers are very thorough. Before asking a question, they elaborate on their own views and then request an explanation for the question.
2022-04-11

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started