4.3 Review

Remodeling in asthma and COPD - differences and similarities

Journal

CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages 20-27

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2010.00193.x

Keywords

asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); inflammation; remodeling; small airways

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Boehringer-Ingelheim/Pfizer
  3. Novartis
  4. Sanofi-Aventis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are both inflammatory disorders. Diagnosis of these diseases is based upon limitation of expiratory airflow. The pathophysiological correlates to this impaired lung function are complex but they are associated with the development of structural changes in the airways and lung parenchyma. These remodeling processes differ between the two diseases. In asthma, airways obstruction is predominately located in the large airways, although recent studies indicate that inflammation and structural changes also is present in other compartments of the lungs. In COPD, remodeling of the small airways and lung parenchyma are the main correlates to the limitation of expiratory airflow. However, both asthma and COPD are heterogeneous disorders including various phenotypes and there is a considerable overlap between the two diseases. Methods and Results: In the present review, airway remodeling in asthma and COPD will be discussed in three different compartments of the airways: large airways, small airways and lung parenchyma. Different inflammatory cells will be mentioned, as well as markers of remodeling. Conclusion: In COPD and severe asthma, current anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy does not restore lung function impairment fully. It is therefore recognized that research aiming to explore mechanisms of airway remodeling should be encouraged. Please cite this paper as: Skold CM. Remodeling in asthma and COPD - differences and similarities. Clin Respir J 2010; 4 (Suppl. 1): 20-27.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available