4.7 Article

The impact of spatial population distribution patterns on CO2 emissions and infrastructure costs in a small Japanese town

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 513-523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.003

Keywords

Compact city; CO2 emissions; Infrastructure costs; Future scenario; Population decrease

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [16K06610]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K06610] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have seen a decrease in the population of Japan. If urban areas continue to expand to the suburbs with this depopulation, various urban problems will arise including increase in energy consumption and the cost of developing and maintaining infrastructure due to high dependence on car use in daily life and inefficient development and maintenance of urban infrastructure. To address this, a compact urban structure is proposed corresponding to the decreasing population especially in provincial small towns. However, it is not clear where denser urban areas are expected and how much of the population will remain located there. Consequently, this study aims to examine a preferable future population distribution pattern from the viewpoint of CO2 emissions and infrastructure costs in Fuchu City, Hiroshima Prefecture, a provincial small town. This study quantitatively assesses the reductive effect of such a population compaction on CO2 emissions and infrastructure costs. Results reveal that creating a compact urban structure will reduce CO2 emissions and infrastructure costs, and the effects differ widely based on scenarios. Furthermore, the study considers the effects of population density in a compact district, population balance among inside and outside of compact district, and central place of compact district on CO2 emissions and infrastructure costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available