4.5 Article

Melt pool segmentation for additive manufacturing: A generative adversarial network approach

Journal

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107183

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Generative adversarial network; Defect detection; Image processing; Image segmentation; Thermal image

Funding

  1. European Union [820776]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61903065]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M643441]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK
  5. Royal Society of the UK
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel image processing method, image-enhancement generative adversarial network (IEGAN), is developed to improve the contrast ratio of thermal images for image segmentation. Experimental results demonstrate that IEGAN outperforms the original GAN in enhancing the contrast ratio of thermal images.
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a popular manufacturing technique which is broadly exploited in rapid prototyping and fabricating components with complex geometries. To ensure the stability of the AM process, it is of critical importance to obtain high-quality thermal images by using image processing techniques. In this paper, a novel image processing method is put forward with aim to improve the contrast ratio of the thermal images for image segmentation. To be specific, an image-enhancement generative adversarial network (IEGAN) is developed, where a new objective function is designed for the training process. To verify the superiority and feasibility of the proposed IEGAN, the thermal images captured from an AM process are utilized for image segmentation. Experiment results demonstrate that the developed IEGAN outperforms the original GAN in improving the contrast ratio of the thermal images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available