4.6 Article

Near-term ecological forecasting for dynamic aeroconservation of migratory birds

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 1777-1786

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13740

Keywords

aeroecology; bird migration; light pollution; radar; remote sensing

Funding

  1. NSF [DBI-1661259, ICER-1927743, IIS-1633206, MSB-NES-2017554]
  2. Lyda Hill Philanthropies
  3. Amon G. Carter Foundation
  4. Leon Levy Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-term ecological forecasting can help mitigate negative impacts on wildlife by providing timely and relevant predictions, as demonstrated in a study focusing on avian migration in the United States. Dynamic mitigation strategies based on dynamic forecasts were found to require fewer action nights compared to static conservation strategies based on fixed time windows.
Near-term ecological forecasting has the potential to mitigate negative impacts of human modifications on wildlife by directing efficient action through relevant and timely predictions. We used the U.S. avian migration system to highlight ecological forecasting applications for aeroconservation. We used millions of observations from 143 weather surveillance radars to construct and evaluate a migration forecasting system for nocturnal bird migration over the contiguous United States. We identified the number of nights of mitigation required to reduce the risk of aerial hazards to 50% of avian migrants passing a given area in spring and autumn based on dynamic forecasts of migration activity. We also investigated an alternative approach, that is, employing a fixed conservation strategy based on time windows that historically capture 50% of migratory passage. In practice, during both spring and autumn, dynamic forecasts required fewer action nights compared with fixed window selection at all locations (spring: mean of 7.3 more alert days; fall: mean of 12.8 more alert days). This pattern resulted in part from the pulsed nature of bird migration captured in the radar data, where the majority (54.3%) of birds move on 10% of a migration season's nights. Our results highlight the benefits of near-term ecological forecasting and the potential advantages of dynamic mitigation strategies over static ones, especially in the face of increasing risks to migrating birds from light pollution, wind energy infrastructure, and collisions with structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available