4.6 Article

3D Graphene Frameworks with Uniformly Dispersed CuS as an Efficient Catalytic Electrode for Quantum Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 288-295

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.052

Keywords

3D graphene frameworks; CuS; counter electrode; electrocatalytic activity; QDSSCs

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51202268]
  2. Shanxi Natural Science Foundation [2013011013-4, 2015021038]
  3. Shanxi Key Scientific and Technological Project [MC2014-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) graphene frameworks (GFs) loading CuS nanocrystals composite (GFs-CuS) are prepared by an in-situ hydrothermal process. We find that 3D graphene frameworks exhibit an excellent supporter for even growth and good distribution of CuS nanocrystals. Such 3D architecture composite could provide multi-direction channels that greatly facilitate electron transport and ion diffusion as well as offer more accessible catalytic active sites. These intrinsic factors are essential for an efficient counter electrode (CE) of quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs). As expected, the CdS/CdSe QDSSCs based on GFs-CuS CE achieves a high power conversion efficiency of 5.04%, which is higher than those of the traditional Pt CE (3.18%), GFs CE (3.60%) and CuS CE (3.75%), even better than 2D graphene-CuS composite CE (4.17%). The electrochemical impedance spectra and Tafel polarization curve analysis reveal that the 3D GFs-CuS composite counter electrode exhibits the lower charge-transfer resistance, faster ion diffusion ability and the higher electrocatalytic activity in comparison with the Pt, GFs, CuS and 2D graphene-CuS electrodes. Furthermore, the GFs-CuS CE exhibits excellent stability, demonstrating its promising potential application as effective counter electrode material in QDSSCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available