4.4 Review

Insights into current clinical research on the immunogenicity of live attenuated influenza vaccines

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 43-55

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1711056

Keywords

Live attenuated influenza vaccine; clinical trial; immunogenicity; antibody immune response; cell-mediated immune response; correlate of protection

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [0557-2019-0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) have been in use for more than three decades and are now licensed in many countries. There is evidence that LAIVs can have greater efficacy than inactivated influenza vaccines, especially against mismatched influenza, however, in recent years, a number of trials have found a lack of LAIV efficacy, mainly in relation to the H1N1 virus. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the results of clinical research published in the past 5 years on the immunogenicity of LAIVs, with special attention to the mechanisms of establishing protective immunity and some factors that may influence immunogenicity and efficacy. Expert opinion: A number of recent clinical studies confirmed that the immune responses to LAIVs are multifaceted, involving different immune mechanisms. These trials suggest that the intrinsic replicative properties of each LAIV component should be taken into account, and the precise effects of adding a fourth vaccine strain to trivalent LAIV formulations are still to be identified. In addition, new data are emerging regarding the impact of pre-vaccination conditions, such as preexisting immunity or concurrent asymptomatic viral and bacterial respiratory infections, on LAIV immunogenicity, suggesting the importance of monitoring them during clinical trials or vaccination campaigns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available