4.8 Article

Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 773-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0114-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R00CA187192, U01CA194389, R01CA188298, U01CA154969]
  2. Stinehart-Reed foundation
  3. Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiatives Seed Grants Program (IIP)
  4. Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research
  5. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-12-1-0498]
  6. Shanahan and Bronzini Family Funds
  7. V Foundation for Cancer Research
  8. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  9. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  10. American Society of Hematology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-cell RNA-sequencing has emerged as a powerful technique for characterizing cellular heterogeneity, but it is currently impractical on large sample cohorts and cannot be applied to fixed specimens collected as part of routine clinical care. We previously developed an approach for digital cytometry, called CIBERSORT, that enables estimation of cell type abundances from bulk tissue transcriptomes. We now introduce CIBERSORTx, a machine learning method that extends this framework to infer cell-type-specific gene expression profiles without physical cell isolation. By minimizing platform-specific variation, CIBERSORTx also allows the use of single-cell RNA-sequencing data for large-scale tissue dissection. We evaluated the utility of CIBERSORTx in multiple tumor types, including melanoma, where single-cell reference profiles were used to dissect bulk clinical specimens, revealing cell-type-specific phenotypic states linked to distinct driver mutations and response to immune checkpoint blockade. We anticipate that digital cytometry will augment single-cell profiling efforts, enabling cost-effective, high-throughput tissue characterization without the need for antibodies, disaggregation or viable cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available