Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics
J SYST ENG ELECTRON
ISSN / eISSN
1671-1793
Aims and Scope
Information not localized
Subject Area
AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
3.20
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Engineering - Control and Systems Engineering | Q2 | #136/286 |
Engineering - Computer Science Applications | Q3 | #399/792 |
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering | Q3 | #375/738 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS - SCIE | Q3 |
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE | Q3 |
OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE - SCIE | Q3 |
H-index
28
Country/Area of Publication
PEOPLES R CHINA
Publisher
Science Press
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1996
Annual Article Volume
136
Open Access
NO
Contact
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING & ELECTRONICS, EDITORIAL DEPT, PO BOX 142-32, BEIJING, PEOPLES R CHINA, 100854
Verified Reviews
Submitted on 16th March 22, and it was received and sent for review on the same day.
On 17th August 22, it showed that the reviewers had finished reviewing. During this period, there was no display of the review progress. I only saw that the editor had sent it to 5-8 reviewers. After reminding once, they said it was being reviewed, so I had to wait.
Rejected on 6th September 22. The opinions of the two reviewers are as follows:
Reviewer 1: The overall structure of the paper is good. The description of the basic knowledge section is redundant. The experimental and analytical parts of the manuscript lack clear control groups or other comparison indicators. Rejected. (Very vague opinion, did not point out where and what kind of control experiments and indicators are missing, not helpful for improving the paper, and also doubted whether the reviewer understood the author's experimental content)
Reviewer 2: The organization of the introduction is confusing, and the author should reorganize this part. The motivation and contribution of this work should be clarified and emphasized. Try to set the issues discussed in this paper more clearly and write a paragraph to define the problem. No decision on accepting/rejecting the manuscript was given. (Obviously, they didn't read my experiment and directly rejected it after reading the abstract and introduction)
In short, it took half a year for this journey, and what I got was two vague review opinions plus an editor's rejection. The experience was very bad. The email did not mention the possibility of appeal, so I assume that there is no way to appeal, and I am too lazy to argue with such reviewers.
I will not submit to this journal in the future.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started