ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING
ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM
ISSN / eISSN
0924-2716
Aims and Scope
The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) is the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). The Journal provides a channel of communication for scientists and professionals in all countries working in the many disciplines that employ photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The Journal is designed to serve as a source reference and archive of advancements in these disciplines.
Subject Area
GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
19.20
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Computer Science - Computer Science Applications | Q1 | #13/792 |
Computer Science - Engineering (miscellaneous) | Q1 | #3/151 |
Computer Science - Computers in Earth Sciences | Q1 | #2/72 |
Computer Science - Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics | Q1 | #8/211 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL - SCIE | Q1 |
GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE | Q1 |
IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY - SCIE | Q1 |
REMOTE SENSING - SCIE | Q1 |
H-index
110
Country/Area of Publication
NETHERLANDS
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1989
Annual Article Volume
276
Open Access
NO
Contact
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Verified Reviews
2022.6: Rejected and resubmitted. The associate editor mentioned the need to include several types of crops for further validation of the algorithm's effectiveness.
2022.9: During the summer break, multiple locations were revisited to collect various crops, and the paper was resubmitted.
2022.11: Major revision. Three reviewers provided more than 150 comments. The first reviewer felt there was a lack of innovation, but the latter two believed that the modifications made the paper acceptable.
2023.1: Returned for revision.
2023.3: Major revision. No major issues, mainly focused on an efficiency problem with the algorithm and language-related matters.
2023.4: Returned for revision.
2023.5.11: Accepted directly.
The chief editor and editors of ISPRS are very reliable. It feels like they remind reviewers to provide feedback after about two weeks. So, even though my process involved rejection, resubmission, major revision, and acceptance, it took less than a year overall. The opinions of the three external reviewers were very helpful, and the paper has significantly improved since the beginning.
It's a great achievement to have my first remote sensing journal publication! I'm also thrilled that it is my second publication in a Tier 1 journal during my doctoral studies.
10.15 Major revision - Received comments from the first round of review, two reviewers suggested major revisions, and the associate editor also provided comments as an individual reviewer, so there were a total of three reviewers.
11.09 With editor - Revised the manuscript according to the comments from the first round of review, conducted additional experiments, and wrote a response of 12,000 words, which was longer than the main text. Sent back to the editor on the same day.
11.25 Decision in process - The editor is making a decision.
12.04 Accepted - The paper has been accepted.
This was my first submission to ISPRS and it was accepted after only one round of major revisions. The process was very fast, and the most important factor was the professionalism of the reviewers and associate editor, who provided valuable suggestions that greatly improved the quality of the paper. The difficulty of submission was high, with high requirements for the quality of the article. Once major revisions were given, it was important to seize the opportunity and make thorough modifications.
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started